Dropping to 31:16? « Singletrack Forum

Bike Forum

[closed]

Dropping to 31:16?

26 posts & 15 voices | Started 1 year ago by Militant_biker | Latest reply from Militant_biker

Tags:

No tags yet.

Militant_biker - Member

Currently running 32:16 on the SS (26"), but round here I'm finding the sudden, sharp technical climbs are a bit much (more used to long, steady climbs). My all day riding ability seems compromised as these short blasts are taking so much out of my legs.

So I was thinking of dropping to a 31:16, as I have a nice 16T White Industries freewheel that I don't want to change. Apart from the obvious, will the 1.6" difference in gear change much? Anybody done it?

Or should I just MTFU and get better at powering up things?

Posted 1 year ago #
singlespeeddan - Member

MTFU

Or a 17 at the back might make life easier. I'd go with the former option

Posted 1 year ago #
Militant_biker - Member

I want to keep the 16T freewheel...

Posted 1 year ago #
mboy - Member

What cranks are you using? I may be wrong here, but for everything except old school compact drive 5 bolt cranks, I think a 32T ring is the smallest you can fit in the middle ring position.

So, sell the 16T and get a 17, or even 18T for more gearing options.

Posted 1 year ago #
Surrounded By Zulus - Member

Only one thing for it. Ride more.

Posted 1 year ago #
Militant_biker - Member

mboy - Middleburn RS8 Uno - can get custom 31 tooth rings

Surrounded By Zulus - partly the problem, I'm riding about every other day now. Can't work (visa restrictions) so I spend the days riding/building trails...

Posted 1 year ago #
mboy - Member

mboy - Middleburn RS8 Uno - can get custom 31 tooth rings

In that case I think you've already decided to do it then haven't you!

Posted 1 year ago #
Scienceofficer - Member

longer crank arms?

Posted 1 year ago #
Militant_biker - Member

Not necessarily mboy, I know it's possible to get a 31t, which is why I'm considering it, but the forcing myself up hills by brute force alone is an appealing option (in an odd way)

Scienceofficer - number of pedal strikes I've had since coming here say no! Plus a new ring is cheaper than longer arms.

The main problem is that I consider anything less than 2:1 a girls gear :-/

Posted 1 year ago #
buzz-lightyear - Member

I'm riding a girl's gear. I tried a boy's gear but it hurt too much.

Posted 1 year ago #
Surrounded By Zulus - Member

Nowt girlie about less that 2:1. I tried everything from 32:14 to 32:22 and find that 32:22 is my fastest option.

Posted 1 year ago #
firestarter - Member

cant see 1.6" making a difference tbh just ride it more

if you did drop to 32/17 its a 3.1" drop btw

Posted 1 year ago #
maxray - Member

32:22
Surely that's just spin out city?

I thought the whole point of singlespeeding was MTFU'ing and giving it beans up hills?

Posted 1 year ago #
buzz-lightyear - Member

I'm currently on 32:20 and on the occasional flat pedally section's it's spin-tastic, although I can now manage to twitch at 120rpm! It was much better at 32:17.

But with 32:17 I could not lever the bars and pedals apart on my usual off-road climbs and was doing too much walking - boring. At 32:20 I can just about do it, and it's getting out of breath and needing to rest that is a problem, i.e. no problem.

Downhill it makes not an iota of difference - I'm just learning not to brake.

Posted 1 year ago #
epicsteve - Member

I initially tried 32:16 but found that a bit tough for my old/unfit legs and lungs so went to 32:18. That was noticebly better on the climbs and just about ok (if a bit slow) on flat sections. 32:20 or 32:22 I'd have thought too low to be reasonably useable - not downhill (MTB singlespeed gearing seems to be too low for there to be any point pedalling downhill, even with 32:16) but because they're too low for any kind of speed on flat sections.

Posted 1 year ago #
Surrounded By Zulus - Member

maxray - Think what gear you'd be pushing if you were on a geared bike.

Coming down hill there are more ways to gain speed other than pedalling.

Posted 1 year ago #
buzz-lightyear - Member

"there are more ways to gain speed other than pedalling"

Indeed, and not being able to pedal faster than 15mph makes you a) not ever brake unless desperate, b) pump every small down slope.

"32:20... too low for any kind of speed on flat sections"

Agreed and I'm having to learn to enjoy the scenery in those situations. Mostly this isn't a problem around here though - it's either up or down.

I am hoping to move up a gear as I get more experience. but I'm in no hurry.

Posted 1 year ago #
oxym0r0n - Member

32:17 here for the Quantocks

Posted 1 year ago #
leggyblonde - Member

try a skinnier rear tyre? it will reduce the gear inches

Posted 1 year ago #
SprocketJockey - Member

32:22 does sound madly low. You must have a crazily fast cadence if you find that comfortable. I tried 32:18 and gave up on it as I was spinning out on the flat.

Out of interest, Is that on a 26er or 29er?

Posted 1 year ago #
Surrounded By Zulus - Member

26" for 32:22. Instead of the fast cadence, it might simply be bigger hills that I ride. I can happily spin up to 200rpm if needs must though.

I enjoy it, it works for me and that's all that matters. I can ride as low as 32:14 round Innerleithen or GT relatively easily, just find 32:22 faster and easier - double bonus.

Posted 1 year ago #
GW - Member

FFS no one's going to care if you just get off and push.

Posted 1 year ago #
Militant_biker - Member

The only situation I'm spinning out here is on the roads, and the occasional doubletrack downhill. 95% of the riding is singletrack, so I'm not too worried about that. It'd be $50 whether I get a 30t or a 31t, so want to get it right! Hmmm...

Thanks for your thoughts

And GW - I care!

Posted 1 year ago #
steve_b77 - Member

I run 32:16 on my SS and find it most exhilarating

Posted 1 year ago #
schmiken - Member

Ned Overend ran 34:21 on a 29er for the National SS Champs - works out to just 47 inches. Roughly equivalent to 32:18 on a 26".

Oh, and he won!

P.S. If you want to run the same gearing you'd need a 29T ring on the front.....

Posted 1 year ago #
Militant_biker - Member

schmiken - I had seen the review of his bike, but completely missed the ratio (or rather, read it but never thought to think about it!) so thanks for that.

Here is definitely not straight up - straight down, so 29:16 might be excessive. 30:16 could be the one.

Still hmmmm...debits

Posted 1 year ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Topic Closed

This topic has been closed to new replies.

Singletrack Mountain Bike Magazine

Bike Forum

Dropping to 31:16?

Topic Closed

Don't miss…

Singletrack

Website & Forums

Exits