Do they have the annoying delay between pushing the button and capturing the image like my digital compact does?
Chat Forum
[closed]
Digital SLR question
-
Posted 1 year ago #
-
no. the delay is about 100..120mS
Posted 1 year ago # -
No, they don't.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Woo hoo!
Cue the title of my next post..
"What digital SLR for a SLR noob?"
Posted 1 year ago # -
No, that's one of the best things about them. You'll find yourself snapping loads of frames like Austin Powers
If it's speed you want, may I make a suggestion?
The Sony a300 (or 310 or whatever it is now) might be worth your attention for a subtle reason. It has a great continuous autofocus feature, that works without you having to hold a button, and also works in live-view mode. So it's always focusing on whatever you're pointing at. Now lots of other cameras have this, but on mine at least you have to be holding the shutter button - which means you've got it up to your eye.
The Sony one works all the time (if you have it set to, you can turn this off) which has a useful side-effect. By the time you've seen the shot, brought the thing up to your face and looked through the viewfinder, it's already focused. So the end result is the thing FEELS incredibly fast to use.
I really liked this when I was shopping, and I would've bought one on the spot if I had the money at the time - as it was I held off, and found a bargain Olympus instead. I still wish my Oly did that tho.
The Sony range represent excellent value for money. Dpreview.com thought they were bad in low light if you shoot in JPG, but if you look at their sample images they are being incredibly picky - a newbie would never notice, nor would I probably. Although I am only slightly less than a newbie
Posted 1 year ago # -
Cue the title of my next post..
"What digital SLR for a SLR noob?"
Go on, pleeeease. I'm bored of the Thatcher thread, and there's not much else of great interest on here today...
Posted 1 year ago # -
@piemann: compacts generally have pretty minimal delay (called "shutter lag") provided that you "pre-focus" them.
When you just hit the button on your compact it has to fiddle with the lens to get your subject in focus, then take some light readings to work out the proper exposure time, then some more readings to calculate the colour balance, and THEN it takes the picture.
If instead you half-press the shutter button and hold it then it will do all that stuff in advance, so when your rider comes past (or whatever) you can fully press it and it will take the shot almost instantly (or at least with a lit less lag).
I recommend you give this a go before splashing out on an SLR.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Or go for a bridge camera, I've got a fuji 9500 and it does everythgng an SLR does except change lenses.
OK the pics aren't quite SLR quality (lense strugles at it's wide and telephoto extremities, sensor is smaller etc), does have a fully manual mode (which is what you need for quick photos as you decide everything in advance, point it at where th riders going to be, wait for them to come past and click.
Posted 1 year ago # -
does have a fully manual mode (which is what you need for quick photos as you decide everything in advance
need ? I have 93000+ exposures on my D300 so far of which 5 were manual...
Posted 1 year ago # -
Out of interest TINAS, ever used a DSLR for more than a play in a shop?
Posted 1 year ago # -
simon, what lens(es) do you use on your D300, particularly interested in wide angle
Posted 1 year ago # -
D3100 ? Very easy to learn, I have had a DSLR for ages but I still liked their "on screen tutorials" .
On top of that you get a great range of lenses to choose from.
Posted 1 year ago # -
I'm considering my first DSLR as well. The Pentax Kx seems to be getting some good reviews and you can get one with kit lens for under £400. What's the STW verdict on Pentax, are they a credible alternative to Canon / Nikon?
Posted 1 year ago # -
What's the STW verdict on Pentax, are they a credible alternative to Canon / Nikon?
Excellent cameras, but lens range is much more restricted than the big two especially at the long end. They do make some great lenses, but very pricy and you are much more dependant on brands like Sigma and Tamron (make some good stuff though)
Harder to find secondhand although they will take all the older range of K mount lenses, mostly manual focus though
I used Pentax DSLR's for a while, but the availability and price of the lenses got too much and switched to Canon.
The Kx is supposedly a great camera for the money and if you are happy with the kit lenses its a great buy.Uses AA's which some people like for the availability and others don't because they need recharging more often
Posted 1 year ago # -
I just got a Nikon D3100 kit for £499.
Not had much chance to use it yet.
I previously had a Nikon D70 which I sold in favour of a high-end compact but I missed the SLR too much.
Posted 1 year ago # -
I had an extended play (a week) with the new Sony SLTA55 and was most impressed. Id seriously consider it if I was starting fresh
Posted 1 year ago # -
Yes,
90% of the time you can sue shutter/appeture priority like normal.
98% of the time you can get even more creative with both.
2% of the time the DSLR will do something the bridge wont, shoot 5 frames a second with auto focusing for example, the bridge manages 1.something and frequently messes up the focusing.Posted 1 year ago # -
I find metering and focusing better and faster with my DSLR. Also, changing the autofocus target is just one button click when looking through the viewfinder.
But the main thing is speed. I can and often do rattle off three or four shots of a moving or changing subject and sometimes one of them is good. Two of my fave shots ever are of my daughter taken last Sunday - in both I kept the button down as she walked about or ran towards me, so I get a far better chance of a great shot. I'd almost certainly have missed those two with a compact. Also as she gurns at me when I point the camera, I can snap at the exact moment I want to and get the shot.
Don't underestimate the advantages of speed. And I have spent my time on compacts and was a big fan of my old Oly, but I'm glad I spent the £300.
Posted 1 year ago # -
simon, what lens(es) do you use on your D300, particularly interested in wide angle
just the one, the Nikkor 18-200 VR. The outside of the camera gets so routinely dirty from biking I prefer never to remove the lens as I always get crap inside and it's such a pain trying to clean the sensor.
98% of the time you can get even more creative with both.
pardon me but I think the limits of "creativity" in exposure/DOF are severely limited compared to the available range of subject matter
Posted 1 year ago # -
eed ? I have 93000+ exposures on my D300 so far of which 5 were manual...
[quote]And conversely I've got about 25,000 on my 400d, about 20% of which are on auto. Holiday snaps mainly. I can't see the point of an SLR if you use it like a compact on auto all the time. All the pics look the same.
And you try using a Vivitar 285hv remote strobe on auto and see what happens: Lots of pics of nothing!Posted 1 year ago # -
But the main thing is speed. I can and often do rattle off three or four shots of a moving or changing subject and sometimes one of them is good. Two of my fave shots ever are of my daughter taken last Sunday - in both I kept the button down as she walked about or ran towards me, so I get a far better chance of a great shot. I'd almost certainly have missed those two with a compact. Also as she gurns at me when I point the camera, I can snap at the exact moment I want to and get the shot.
Don't underestimate the advantages of speed. And I have spent my time on compacts and was a big fan of my old Oly, but I'm glad I spent the £300.
Very true to be fair. That said SFBs Nikon will do 6fps or more, my Canon only 3fps and I kept finding I was getting a shot 'either side' of what I wanted, so I turned it to single shot and I've been trying to learn timing.... It's not easy though, I'm still a bit premature a lot of the time! (Stop giggling at the back! Tsk!
)
Posted 1 year ago # -
Think he probably meant manual as opposed to shutter or aperture priority
Don't use full manual that much myself, but never use auto
Posted 1 year ago # -
Taken about 15,000 shots this year and 99% are manual.
Which DSLR? Which EuroRepMobile, Vectra/Mondeo?
My personal choice is Canon because I like their lenses. Whichever feels comfortable in your hands and your budget will be good for you. Spend a bit more time thinking about which lenses will be good for you and get the camera which fits them.
Posted 1 year ago # -
All the pics look the same.
doesn't that depend more on what you point the camera at ?
Posted 1 year ago # -
doesn't that depend more on what you point the camera at ?
I know what you mean (Mr Pedantic!
) but I mean the feel of them rather than the content. I do like my blur.... I've actually just uploaded some pics I took on the Chilterns on Saturday. There's a few of those which show what I mean. Let me get them on Flickr and I'll be back....
Posted 1 year ago # -
pardon me but I think the limits of "creativity" in exposure/DOF are severely limited compared to the available range of subject matter
All the pics look the same.
doesn't that depend more on what you point the camera at ?I agree with Barnes here.
Posted 1 year ago # -
I agree with Barnes here
That's because you're missing the point.
SFBs pics only look the same because all he ever points his camera at is the Lake District...!
Joke! JOKE!
Posted 1 year ago # -
No I do understand what you are saying. Most of my early few 'rolls' with my camera looked boring and a bit of camera faffage might've helped.
I think what Barnsie is saying is that some subjects speak for themselves, regardless of camera. But you know that too
Give us an example of what kind of adjustments you might make? I mean, I do stuff like set portrait mode or whatever; turn flash on and off; change the autofocus or metering target; blanket under- or over-expose, but not very often.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Seems to be some confusion here between automatic and manual.
Auto (aka green box) attempts to do everything and leaves you very little control.
Scene modes (e.g. Portrait, Landscape, Party, Fireworks etc) are all just slightly more specific versions of Auto.Aperture or Shutter priority some old schoolers call "auto" but really they are far closer to manual. Perhaps they should be called semi-manual or something.
Manual means manually setting the shutter speed and aperture yourself.
Personally I almost always use the priority modes, I very very rarely use Manual and I never use Scene or Auto as even a rank amateur like me can usually do a better job than those modes.
(then of course there is manual versus auto focus which is a different kind of auto/manual debate altogether).
Posted 1 year ago # -
I can't see a need for manual mode over the priority modes and the under/over exposure knob... ?
As for manual focusing - I'd be happy with that except it seems like it'd be pretty difficult without the old-skool split circle...
Posted 1 year ago # -
I can't see a need for manual mode over the priority modes and the under/over exposure knob... ?
Three possible scenarios:
• Anytime you want all your shots to be exposed exactly the same. Especially useful when you plan to stitch them together.
• Doing long exposure 'Bulb' shots where you keep the shutter open for say 15 minutes to get star trails.
• Studio work.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Anytime you want all your shots to be exposed exactly the same. Especially useful when you plan to stitch them together.
for which I press the "AE-lock" button
Posted 1 year ago # -
Ok, but for the first one I have exposure lock, or just keep the button half down; the second - well obviously
; Studio work - explain?
Posted 1 year ago # -
for which I press the "AE-lock" button
That also works, but it can be a faff to try to keep it held while you try to swivel a tripod.
Or if you've reassigned the AE-L button to be AF-On as lots of folk do.Posted 1 year ago # -
Studio work - explain?
Never done any, don't really know but I'm guessing studio guys use manual as they want to expose the pic based on the light when all the flashes etc go off - not on the light that is there before the shot.
Posted 1 year ago #
Topic Closed
This topic has been closed to new replies.
