Overview Chat Bike Members News Women
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • XX1 Q factor
  • Taz
    Full Member

    Starting to think I may ‘need’ XX1. What considerations are there with regard to the different Q factors they offer?

    Thanks

    Posted 11 years ago
    njee20
    Free Member

    The narrow one won’t fit many FS frames.

    Posted 11 years ago
    Taz
    Full Member

    Thanks Njee20

    So basically I would need the 168 version?

    Posted 11 years ago
    njee20
    Free Member

    There’s a compatibility chart somewhere, but getting the wider one is a safe bet! The narrow one won’t fit things like Scott Sparks, so it’s not even the style of bike.

    Posted 11 years ago
    100mphplus
    Free Member

    It’s a bt of a mystery tbh! I had the same dilema as you and couldn’t find any info so measured my existing cranks and got a Q figure of 172 so ordered the wider 168’s.

    I then found the sram guide and the measurements are just confusing as the 168 isn’t actually 168mm!!

    http://cdn.sram.com/cdn/farfuture/YpU-WUMXbdni3qyD5HRJPERVgiFIXtxwvPRVhP11TJE/mtime:1354290867/sites/default/files/techdocs/gen_0000000004172_rev_c_-_xx1_frame_fit_specifications.pdf

    Posted 11 years ago
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)

The topic ‘XX1 Q factor’ is closed to new replies.

Overview Chat Bike Members News Women