Home Forums Chat Forum UK Election!

Viewing 40 posts - 3,441 through 3,480 (of 8,917 total)
  • UK Election!
  • 1
    zippykona
    Full Member

    The tory hate press will hold any labour government to accountability

    1
    TiRed
    Full Member

    having an ageing Volvo estate

    Too middle class. Those you refer to are still driving their Mercedes W124 estates.

    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    Can we have Ed Davey pictured riding a mountain bike please?

    Even better get him an instructor for a couple of hours to teach him to jump first.

    And can we get Cathro to both coach and ask a few choice questions? It could be called ‘Between the Tapes Left and Right’.

    2
    mrbadger
    Free Member

    When you think about it, that’s pretty **** up

    Absolutely spot on. I think the vast majority of decent people wouldn’t begrudge higher taxes if the end result was better social equality and services. But it doesn’t, taxes continually go up and the only people that seem to benefit are those at the top of the tree

    ernielynch
    Full Member

    The tory hate press will hold any labour government to accountability

    Jeezus that might be exactly what they want their readers to believe but I don’t think that telling lies and distorting the truth in one sided “debates” in their publications amounts to holding the government to account!

    I would rather that the government be held accountable from the floor of the House of Commons and House of Commons Select Committees, as well as other venues suitable for balanced debates.

    PrinceJohn
    Full Member

    Asked if he had ever gone without something, the PM told ITV: “Yes, I mean, my family emigrated here with very little. And that’s how I was raised. I was raised with the values of hard work.”

    Mr Sunak’s father was a GP, while his mother ran her own pharmacy.

    Asked what sort of things had to be sacrificed, he said: “Lots of things.”

    Pressed for an example, he said: “All sorts of things like lots of people.

    Wow – didn’t know his family were mass murderers…

    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    When you think about it, that’s pretty **** up

    True.
    And it seems most of the home owners of the UK are happy to increase that process to keep themselves feeling wealthy and the peasants from buying on their street.

    thisisnotaspoon
    Free Member

    Wasn’t the favored car of the country estate class a Subaru Forrester?

    Although that assumes that the engines didn’t grenade themselves.

    I think a bigger problem than tax is where the money flows.  For example (MMT fans close your ears) we use tax money to give to poor people to pay their rent, but that goes straight into the pocket of rich people directly and/or when they ultimately sell the property they’ve invested in.  The ability to buy a house to let means you are taking poor people’s money, and the ability to do that means that house then becomes more valuable to other rich people, making it harder for those poor people to buy their own houses and get out of the trap they’re in.

    When you think about it, that’s pretty **** up.

    That also hold true from an MMT perspective.

    Just think of tax and interest rates as two different ways of taking money out of the economy.

    Low interest rates drive up house prices (bad for poorer people).

    Low interest rates make acquiring more assets cheap (good for rich people).  E.g. I definitely wouldn’t have a stocks and shares ISA if my mortgage wasn’t fixes at a pre-Truss rate! Alternatively I could have put that money into BTL or just outbidding someone on a house pushing the prices up either way.

    Long term house prices are going to be limited by affordability, they can’t keep going up as a multiple of income, we’ve maxed out the sensible loan terms, and we’ve gone from 1 income per household to two. If rates stay in the 4-5% region and we build a few hundred thousand more of them to equalize supply and demand so there’s less pressure, then house prices will probably just stagnate because unless we build houses people don’t actually want then people will always spend as much as they can afford on the nicest house they can afford.

    MMT doesn’t give you a free lunch, it just explains there are more ways to pay for it than just the HMRC current account.

    1
    fenderextender
    Free Member

    Oh, I know Shapps is talking bollocks.

    I was just enjoying the irony of Grant ‘Three Aliases’ Shapps banging on about accountability.

    2
    molgrips
    Free Member

    I think the vast majority of decent people wouldn’t begrudge higher taxes if the end result was better social equality and services. But it doesn’t, taxes continually go up and the only people that seem to benefit are those at the top of the tree

    But the taxes aren’t the thing you should begrudge, it’s the other policies. The taxes are still needed.

    Gribs
    Full Member

    but as the Tories are being punished for not actually being right wing.

    I do think it’s brilliant that that’s the conclusion most Tories seem to have already reached, bless ‘em

    It’s not an entirely unreasonable position. They’re being punished for being incompetent and not following through on what they say. Record tax and immigration levels are hardly traditional right wing policies.

    2
    neilnevill
    Free Member

    I’m amused by the disjointed messages!

    Shapps, ‘we are done for,  give us your pity vote. ‘

    Lil’ Rishi, ‘this election isn’t over!’

    😅😂

    slowoldman
    Full Member

    It’s ironic that Europe is increasingly voting to the Right, but as the Tories are being punished for not actually being right wing, Britain will lurch in the opposite direction as the only alternative option are Reform who are too new to get a foothold in parliament

    If this government are not right wing then I don’t know what is. What sort of policies do you propose? We’ve had a period of right wing government and decided we don’t like it. Perhaps we’re just a few years ahead on Europe (for a change).

    Personally I think it should probably be taxed as a household income though.  Two people on 45K pa are paying less tax that a couple with one earner on 90K and one on nothing.

    “Married man’s tax allowance” was abolished in 1990 in favour independent taxation which was considered fairer to married women.

    ernielynch
    Full Member

    Record tax and immigration levels are hardly traditional right wing policies.

    Yeah but they aren’t being punished for that. Otherwise it would be Reform UK that would be expected to win a landslide, not Labour.

    As you say, low tax and immigration levels are hardly right wing policies, so why are almost half of the electorate saying that they intend voting Labour?

    Are Labour now considered to be to the right of the Tories?

    1
    somafunk
    Full Member

    A bit of light relief

    3
    kimbers
    Full Member

    Regarding taxation being too high…

    Screenshot_20240612-174415

    ernielynch
    Full Member

    Regarding taxation being too high…

    I reckon those making the claim would regard all those countries above the UK as socialist, if not practically communist – see grimep’s earlier hilarious faux confusion between the Greens and communists.

    They would then point to the United States and provide it as an example of a socialist free and advanced democracy.

    1
    maccruiskeen
    Full Member

    I’m amused by the disjointed messages!

    Shapps, ‘we are done for,  give us your pity vote. ‘

    Lil’ Rishi, ‘this election isn’t over!’

    Oh it certainly isn’t over – its can still get worse. :-)

    4
    dazh
    Full Member

    if they raise tax then fair enough, but its not justified imo until they go after all the tax dodgers, folks who have wealth without earning it (ie inherited), fat cats, and companies and corporations that make huge profits for shareholders at the expense of the rest of society

    This. I earn over 50k. When all the billionaires and Uber-millionaires pay the same proportion (or more) of their ‘income’ on tax as I do they can come and ask me for more and I’ll be happy to pay it. Until then they can f*** off quite frankly.

    slowoldman
    Full Member

    I wonder if Craig Williams has had a little flutter on losing his own seat.

    Gribs
    Full Member

    Yeah but they aren’t being punished for that. Otherwise it would be Reform UK that would be expected to win a landslide, not Labour.

    They’re predicted to lose a lot of their voters to reform and labour but I expect even more will just stay at home. The Tories aren’t trusted by plenty on the right to deliver on their promises and Farage only appeals to a poorly educated subset. The token performative policies like Rawanda which even if it stopped “illegal” migration entirely wouldn’t make a difference to legal visas which they could have controlled but haven’t.

    As you say, low tax and immigration levels are hardly right wing policies, so why are almost half of the electorate saying that they intend voting Labour?

    Labour aren’t really promising any major changes to current policies on tax or immigration, just more competence and less dishonesty.

    2
    kimbers
    Full Member

    I’m off fir an evening ride but sounds like the debate might be spicy!

    https://x.com/petercardwell/status/1800945015872479391?t=aIvaFbhUwxoHzsmX_3HS7Q&s=19

    Screenshot_20240612-185731

    ernielynch
    Full Member

    Farage only appeals to a poorly educated subset.

    Rubbish. Plenty of public school educated right-wingers with professional backgrounds are massive supporters of Nigel Farage, the Tory Party for a start is full of them.

    So the question remains if the Tories are going to lose the general election because they aren’t right-wing enough why is it Labour which is expected to win a landslide not Reform UK?

    Whatever your views of the current Labour Party no sane person believes that they are now more right-wing than the Tories.

    sc-xc
    Full Member

    Rishi: English schools are the best in the UK.

    igm
    Full Member

    Plenty of public school educated right-wingers with professional backgrounds

    Probably some of our Nige’s old classmates in that description.

    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    Rishi: English schools are the best in the UK.

    Tell me you live in southern & central England without telling me you live in southern and central England.

    imnotverygood
    Full Member

    Nick Robinson is absolutely skewering Jim Swinney on TV at the moment.

    scotroutes
    Full Member

    Nick Robinson is absolutely skewering Jim Swinney on TV at the moment.

    Who the hell is Jim Swinney?

    Kryton57
    Full Member

    Kier would do well to let Beth finish.

    rone
    Full Member

    Beth Rigby debate:

    Starmer talking absolute shite on the electricity companies.

    It is so ridiculous to compare a private customer energy bill to a bill that the government can stand over nationalisation. Not even close. His argument is devoid of all awareness of government finances.

    Needless to say the government gains an asset when it takes stuff into ownership.

    dogmatix
    Full Member

    Single Track World an arrogant, back slapping, left wing, echo chamber. Equally adept at smearing the upper-classes and the underclass but not their own class. ‘Plenty of public school educated right-wingers’ ‘Farage only appeals to a poorly educated subset.’

    sc-xc
    Full Member

    😂

    1
    somafunk
    Full Member

    Single Track World an arrogant, back slapping, left wing, echo chamber. Equally adept at smearing the upper-classes and the underclass but not their own class. ‘Plenty of public school educated right-wingers’ ‘Farage only appeals to a poorly educated subset.

    To quote Mike Skinner…..

    Dry your eyes mate……

    Beth Rigby debate:

    Starmer talking absolute shite on the electricity companies.

    GB Energy….totally debunked but he’ll still repeat it will reduce energy costs.

    dogmatix
    Full Member

    Larger government just means more control over the people and an oppressive regime. But you all know better than the plebs so I am sure you feel comfortable with running (ruining) their lives. We already live in a system where democracy has been hollowed out by Blair and sovereignty handed to unelected left leaning QUANGOS. Again I have no doubt the socialists and control freaks in the STW forum are more than happy that their superior middle management intellect is governing the masses.

    dogmatix
    Full Member

    Why would I need to dry my eyes? I’m not your mate.

    1
    ransos
    Free Member

    Why would I need to dry my eyes?

    I reckon a Labour government for the next ten years should do the trick.

    8
    sc-xc
    Full Member

    I’m not your mate.

    You’re never likely to be mine either tbf.

    dogmatix
    Full Member

    Why would I need to be emotional about it? It doesn’t surprise me that you view this as an emotional battle more about inflicting cost/revenge than about doing anything of real value. It just seems that the STW forum is an orgy of middle class feeble conformity. Not really a place of robust, honest, good faith, open, productive debate. Again, a back patting hierarchy more than anything else. I am not sure that is a healthy space to truly explore ideas.

    1
    Kryton57
    Full Member

    Ok, here comes the tiny ****…*

    *Sunak to be clear, not to offend dogmatix).  **

    ** Asterix.  Tea anyone?

Viewing 40 posts - 3,441 through 3,480 (of 8,917 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.