doesn’t that just end up as “the poor are lazy” ?
The trouble with that sort of straw manning is it convinces no one to listen to a valid argument.
I try to take a balanced view on these things and see both sides. And explained it to my politically uninterested nephew last week (who can vote but doesn’t) how it’s supposed to work. It is possible to frame both ideologies in a positive way and then let people make up their mind based on either which argument they agree with or which political party just does things more competently.
Left of center –
The rich pay pay taxes which pay for a bus lane which brings people to their business, therefore they make more money overall.
The poor have access to a bus which get’s them to work, therefore they make more money.
Right of center –
The rich pay less taxes and no bus lane is built. Therefore they have more money.
The poor pay less taxes therefore have more money in their pocket to buy a car and don’t need the bus.
Substitute in education, defense, health care or whatever you like into the analogy as appropriate.
It’s entirely valid to extend that analogy at the moment and say that the Tories are actually spending money on busses but the bus company is owned by their mate and doesn’t have any busses and the staff are all on strike because they’ve not had a fair pay deal in a decade so no one is benefitting. And that should be enough to convince you to vote for something else even if you are philosophically right of center.