It’s hard to do this kind of test, as a lot of people have said with so many variables however I think it gives people the general idea, I also think they should have maybe factored price into the equation ? I don’t think that changing tyres should be done either(for a test/review) because They are the tyres the manufactures have chose to put on and sell it to you and therefore if they’ve put the wrong tyres on it should show in the results.
Also I have the cube stereo sla that they tested, a horrendously capable bike maybe slightly heavier here and there but still comes around 30lb however I think it’s the cheapest in the test ?? Which does make me wonder why they didn’t use the more expensive team 160 one, at £4500 it would have been more in the ball park with the likes of the nomad with a carbon frame, fox 36’s better drive train etc etc.
I think they also should have chucked a 29er in there to see how they compare ?