Overview Chat Bike Members News Women
  • This topic has 11 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by nikk.
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • The reason SC had to rename the Solo
  • mikewsmith
    Free Member

    Posted 9 years ago
    Kryton57
    Full Member

    Not the first time RM have got someone to change the name of their bike to protect theirs. Sensitive souls aren’t they…

    Posted 9 years ago
    Leku
    Free Member

    God I’m slow. Now I understand 5010..

    Posted 9 years ago
    matther01
    Free Member

    You’re not the only one Leku…I’ve been waiting to find out what they’ve renamed it to!

    Posted 9 years ago
    Pawsy_Bear
    Free Member

    Err why 5010?

    Posted 9 years ago
    smatkins1
    Free Member

    God I’m slow. Now I understand 5010..

    I’m even slower, I’ve only just worked that out after seeing your post.

    Posted 9 years ago
    bullandbladder
    Free Member

    Squint at it

    Posted 9 years ago
    coogan
    Free Member

    Err why 5010?

    SOLO
    5010

    Simple eh? Oh wait, that’s some else bike name as well…

    Posted 9 years ago
    bluearsedfly
    Free Member

    I can see BOLLOX if I squint really hard.

    Posted 9 years ago
    Pawsy_Bear
    Free Member

    Oh ha ha I see

    Posted 9 years ago
    CaptainFlashheart
    Free Member

    Where’s the OUTRAGE then? If it was because of Trek or Spesh protecting a brand name, there’d be OUTRAGE! 😉

    Posted 9 years ago
    nikk
    Free Member

    You might want to go get that seen too.

    Posted 9 years ago
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

The topic ‘The reason SC had to rename the Solo’ is closed to new replies.

Overview Chat Bike Members News Women