Just to expand on my previous post,
I think where we’re going with this perhaps is a separation between the notion of a “god” and religion / religious texts. Because even if we agree that the Bible or [insert Good Book here] is a valuable source of life lessons, and we agree that some form of ‘god’ actually exists, the former is still a piss poor piece of evidence for the latter given that the accounts upon which it’s based are hand-me-down tales which are by human nature fundamentally unreliable.
What I mean by this is, for example, we still don’t really know for sure whether Robin Hood really existed. Our modern understanding is based on legends some 500 years old, which isn’t a world apart from the NT’s accounts of Jesus (and record-keeping has probably improved slightly in the intervening millennium). It’s not a great leap to see how there might have been a bit of embellishment along the way. Maybe Jesus is an amalgam of a number of people who have been nice to each other over the years, maybe he was a proto-Derren Brown whose parlour tricks amazed the largely uneducated populace. Over five centuries of word-of-mouth retellings it’s easy to see how rocking up to a handful of people armed with a packed lunch and a finger buffet could turn into the Sermon on the Mount.
I wonder idly whether what’s needed is a rewrite of the Bible. So we can have an updated, modern guide to life that’s in line with 21st Century thinking, laws and morals, but isn’t dependant on circular logic and a tenuous belief in the supernatural.