[Closed] Stone Roses new single . . .

That was sh*t.

SO i could not do that for the c word but i can write ****

Sounds like the credits should read [i]Lyrics & music: N.Gallagher[/i]

[i]Heaton Park was fantastic. And yes it was like a karaoke session for middle-aged men![/i]

Can't think of anything more fantastic than that 😆

Shit

Oh I see yes you can

Not great but not as bad as I feared it would be was my review.

All for one, one for all...... what rhymes with all.......ball, call, tall, wall.......yeah wall, build a wall, ****ing deep lyrics man!!

That really is poor. I lasted 1 minute and 11 seconds.

Mih, a whole bag of mih.

[url= http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/arts-entertainment/what-a-great-song-stone-roses-fan-tells-himself-20160513108805 ]The Mash has it...[/url]

[i]The Mash has it...[/i]

Sums up Radio One last night that's for sure.

Song shit, worse than shit.

Its not the lyrics its the whole thing.

Wow it's bad. It's really, really bad.

They're before my time so I don't have any emotional investment. Still, I'd rather hear good music than whatever that is. It's so witless and juvenile.

it reminds me of watching 90's MTB films.

good because it reminds me of that, but generally the soundtracks to early MTB films were a bit pants.

It's mince:-(

weak - or at least the first half was; didn't make it to the end 🙁

I had 2 more enforced listens this morning on the radio. Still crap.
Am also amazed with the all/wall rhyme. Talk about simplistic.
My 17 yr old daughter played this on Spotify immediately after and I think I prefer it.

I don't mind it.

Not their best, but harks back to simpler times and sublime tunes before the dreaded spectre of Zeppelin clouded their minds.

It's not bad, but it's lazy. They've done nothing to advance or refresh their sound.

The first album remains what it is, but I've desperately been waiting for new material but it's not looking good.

I like it and I suspect knowing the Roses & Ian Brown there's more to it than that. I have an old friend that is really good mates with Ian Brown if I can get hold of him I will ask him.

Sounds like the credits should read Lyrics & music: N.Gallagher

Unfortunately it sounds much, much more like an L. Gallagher effort

Outtake from the lost Seahorses album. Poor.

Shurely you meant the Shirehorses. I thought it was a parody

and they must think this is the strongest track from their new material? Awful and even worse than that it's an earworm so I keep finding it running round in my head and hating myself for it.

Guitar is nice. But that's about it. I remember the disappointment of The Second Coming but I've grown to like a few tracks on it over the years. This is worse than anything on there.

On the plus side, the new Super Furries track is ace, DESPITE being about football.

The SFA track is one purile ear worm!

I never heard my nan say 'if you can't say anything nice then say nothing at all'. But I grew to admire her for embodying the phrase in manner.

My lips are sealed 😐

It's ****ing shite.

^ 😆

This has all for one in it.....rip-off?

Maybe Ian Brown is a massive Musketeers fan

Bryan Adams is a really sound guy. I know!

It's alright

But doesn't have any edge or bite... Bit happy clappy really

Should have gone with with a grumpy old bloke vibe.... Cus that's us, thier old audience ... Is it not?

Well they've got the Roses sound right, definitely closer to the first album than Second Coming - which is good.

The lyrics are surprisingly basic. I never really pondered over the words to their hits, but they always seemed nicely enigmatic and very distinctive to them.

Go on, you know you want to hear this now...

And they had a lot to live up to, imagine if they'd come back with something like this...

It's growing on me

Me too.

You'd imagine they've an album in the pipeline and this is just the worst song put out there as a teaser. Well you'd hope its something like that and there's better to come.

Quite dissappointing though, as the stone roses stuff is good, personally I much prefer browns solo stuff though, but you'd think, given that, they would try something different and a bit more nuanced and have a much more developed sound instead of trying to hark back to an era. (sounds like they had a meeting to discuss the type of sound they want to go for rather than just go and jam and develop tunes naturally, it sounds overly contrived,)

I'll final reserve judgement till I hear what other stuff they've got out.

Don't hold out much hope mind you, I don't think this new stuff 20 years down the line works very well. The Pixies new stuff was a bit crap anawl.

llama - Member
It's growing on me

POSTED 1 HOUR AGO # REPORT-POST
deadlydarcy - Member
Me too.

POSTED 1 HOUR AGO # REPORT-POST

This kinda thing is a daily mash article waiting to happen, stop kidding yourselves! 😆

Well that fragile happiness,keeps me from forgetting.

Should that have been played on 45, rather than 33 1/3

A huge portion of the forum will have no idea what that means!

I think you are vastly underestimating the middle aged bloke population of this forum.

I like it until the vocal comes in. Unfortunately that's only 14 seconds.

and they did write some decent lyrics - I still really like this.

So, It's a beautiful thing... Is than attempt to rescue the first single's reaction?

Much better but feels more an album track than a single.

First effort was Seahorses with Ian Brown on vocals.

New one is an Ian Brown solo material + Second Coming Roses hybrid, much better but not stellar

Beautiful Thing seems to follow on from Second Coming. Naturally, the rhythm section sounds slower as they're all middle aged blokes now, but can't help thinking it's a lazy return in general. The new material is likely to make an album up that will come in third place, but I don't care, I'm still going to spend £9 on them just to have the new material.

not bad. 90s wahwah guitar in full effect.