Using the Eastern Bloc as an example, when taken to the extreme nationalisation and a “jobs for all” agenda can create poor efficiency, productivity and services.
Yeah it’s not about the Eastern Bloc, and mass unemployment is not a good substitute for “jobs for all”.
Thatcherite Tories will simultaneously claim that no one should should be on the dole and that no one has the right to a job.
The campaign against pit closures was actually about the right to work. There is no society on Earth where everything that needs to be done has been done and any unemployment is simply due to surplus requirement.
Millions of people idle due to unemployment does not represent efficiency. Which explains why the tax burden went through the roof under Thatcher.
But the greatest cost was the social cost. It lay the basis for ever growing social inequality and all the problems it invariably brings such as rising crime and violence.
It shouldn’t be forgotten that whilst the northern working-class in industrial towns were being thrown out of work and denounced as “the enemy within” by Thatcher, self-serving ‘yuppies’ in the metropolises were filling their boots with new found wealth because apparently they were worth it.
Nothing epitomised more Thatcher’s contempt for social justice than the poll tax. It brought about her demise but the damage her premiership left on the fabric of society is still visible today.
Mind you none of that explains why Yaxley-Lennon is a ****. You can’t blame Thatcher for that.