glenp, I was offended* by the declaration that cyclists that are unable to hear are unsafe.
And believe me, I have not ‘developed’ any other senses, I just usse the ones I still have available, the same ones an iPod wearer still has.
I’m not disputing that if you decide to impair one of your senses then you have to make sure you are using the others and that overall it might be better not to wear an iPod, but to carpet all of us, iPod users and the deaf and hard of hearing as ‘unsafe’ is just plain unfair.
*I’m not as offended as you might think, but I feel the need to draw attention as I hear comments like that far too frequently.
Sorry to go off on one about it once upon a time a good friend of mine was knocked off by a driver who suggested to the police officer who attended that my friend was riding witout due care and attention as he was wearing earphones and thus not paying enough attention to the traffic around him, it just really hits a nerve with me…
Its the same argument as speeding in some ways…
A driver doing 32 in a 30 zone but driving sensibly is arguably more safe than a driver doing 25 and weaving all over the road.
The safey of the cyclist is determined by their actions, riding skills, road positioning, observation etc, just because they can’t hear doesn’t make them unsafe.