Queried with my LBS and they said you wouldn’t notice much difference to riding the 32 or the 36….they had 32’s in stock so I built them.
anything else you want to check up on me then??
Nah – I just remember you asking previously and wondered what had happened. I have a carbon Blur – maybe that’s why your previous thread stuck in my memory?
I’ll not ask you to name the LBS though – might be a bit embarrassing for them.
I find a weekend’s expedition eating raw squirrels sleeping under moss combined with a spot of dry stone walling* much better for clearing the head…
Im at the peak of mental ability and physical strength and fitness since that is part of my weekly routine.
I do allow myself an “off day” though, where I can go out and ride my bike, eat my body weight in carbohydrates and spend extortionate amounts of money on incorrect forks, wheels and stems for my bike.
I’ll not ask you to name the LBS though – might be a bit embarrassing for them
Beat me to it, but I was going to request they were named so that everyone can avoid them like the plague. Obviously had a carbon Nomad frame and 32 forks in stock they needed to get rid of. Any LBS that recommends a Nomad for XC riding, and then says you won’t notice the difference between and 32 and a 36 fork should have their reseller rights removed
Hurrah….we’ve broken him,that was quick. 😉
Who’s next to unsuspectingly post a picture of their pride and joy only to get flamed with the incandescent light of the stw ‘truth’.
NEXT!
Personally I wouldn’t build a Nomad the way you have and yes the stem is too long for my liking but it’s NOT MY BIKE. Do with it what you will and enjoy it. I own a Nomad myself with 160 forks, 50mm stem, wide bars, bigger tyres etc, great bikes. Should you feel the need you can always change stuff. Don’t know if anyone remembers but some of the off the peg Nomads used to come with Pikes so i don’t see any problem with 150mm Fox.
And Captain Mainwaring – they actually had a blur in stock to and I, ME, choose the frame and fork.
Christ – I expected posting my bike on here would draw some comments but for some people to take it soo seriously is actually quite sad. Do people not realise that I choose the parts and asked them to build the bike – it’s my choice as nodrog2 mentioned if I want to update stuff later on I can.
My haven stem has actually just arrived so I will be fitting that tonight when I pick it up so at least I will satisfy the gods that are Rorschach and Captain Mainwaring and others.
matt23, can i ask if you tried the bike with a 36 before you settled on a 32? althoug the travel difference is only 10mm, the difference in length is more and it is quite a bit stiffer. not a critisism, just interested.
also, did you get a test ride on a nomad and a blur lt? what bike were you on before? i ask because if this is your first big bike they can feel a bit ’tilted back’ until you get your head around shifting your body position forawrd for the climbs. i was wondering if this was why you had gone for a girls fork shorter a2c length? 😉
Cheers slowrider – tested a blur on 32’s and a nomad on 32 and 36….this is my first big bike but I liked the Nomad 32 when I rode it round Brechfa a few months back.
The tilt back is not as bad as I thought it would be – I actually like it…..but with the saddle further back now and the shorter stem to be fixed tonight it will be better….will admit the bars are too small at the mo but the Haven’s are coming god knows where they are but they are coming.
well, if you demo’d it and like it then i cant fault that really.
have you thought about a shorter i2i length shock to put the geomety back where it was designed and lower the bb a bit? thats a critisism ive heard about nomads before. could potentially unleash a right little ripper there! i had a plan to make a 120mm heckler a while back but never got round to it…
This thread reminds me why I don’t come here so often these days….
…. If Matt likes his bike and enjoys riding (and looking at it)then that’s all that matters.
Though I agree, I’m sure he’ll like it even more with a short stem.
Matt, most of the people criticising your choice probably ride around not really fully enjoying their rides; worrying if their choice of fork is right or if their damping is set just so, or what people might think of their non-matching chainstay protector or whatever;-)
is this all about ‘having a carbon nomad’ but not needing one? after all it is the envy bike du jour, which probably generates all these lovely comments.
have to say weird build though, mind you i have an old 224 with sids
For those who think I have the wrong bike/frame/groupset……entitled to your opinion and I expect it from posting my bike on here but I will happily keep up with you guys on XC race/trail/all mountain (maybe not balls out DH) – I may suffer on the hill going up (fitness) or going down (due to being scared probably) – but I will get there and smile my ass off all day long.
Comment of the thread for me!!!! Enjoy mate, I like the build and those fox forks are great. I think it will be a great fast fun bike.
to all the “defenders”, this is a forum not Sycophant’s Corner. All the “detractors” have offered well-meant criticism, not driven by malice or envy, and the OP has admitted the tiller stem is too long (and even he thinks it might be a white overload). If I could afford a white carbon Nomad I’d have either that or the Mojo HD in a heartbeat.
I reckon white frame and fork, black everything else is a nice balance, but local riding buddy Trimix berates me that “white is not a colour”.
To the OP this was my Mk1 in light build mode (EC70 post and bar, Mg/Ti pedals, sub200grm saddle), later fitted with beefy Flatboys and Joplin.
in the chilterns, where 160mm and 8″ rotors are possibly overkill