tfb – see where you’re coming from but to me images are to reproduce closely not only the look but the feeling of the thing you’re looking at too. In order to get all of the feeling AND appearance I think it requires the full dynamic range and sometimes over-saturation enhances the visual field and somehow evokes more of a feeling of the place.
For interests sake I tried HDRing a nice sunset, to get the detail of the mountain range that was in the picture too, it didn’t work – it lost the feeling, so the raw shot was better IMO (blatent own foto plug):
![](http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3646/3439265601_c1d833e1aa.jpg)
But ultimately its personal taste, everyone sees colours and tones slightly differently so everyone is going to find things more or less acceptable depending on the colours and tones used!
The main problem I find with HDR is getting the correct exposures to blend nicely, slightly too much off the top can screw up an image and create nasty patches of oddness, I’m currently working on a script for my camera (CHDK) to automatically assess the dynamic range needed and grab the required number of shots at the required exposures.