Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 46 total)
  • Lead in petrol and the crime rate
  • BlobOnAStick
    Full Member

    I’ve had a look around, but can’t see this mentioned on here, so apologies if it’s been done.

    This article BBC highlight the statistical link between lead in petrol and the crime rate

    I find this absolutely fascinating; could it also point to the ever increasing pass rates of exams?

    I suppose there’s a history of discovering things that we surround ourselves with cause us harm (arsenic in wallpaper etc) but it makes me wonder about all the things that we expose ourselves to as a society. For example; antibacterial wipes/cleaners, diesel particulates, ‘conditioned’ air, fortified foods, washing products, deodorants etc etc.

    Mind you, it’s easy to come over all Daily Wail about it eh?

    derekfish
    Free Member

    Mobile Phones, WiFi and the cancer rate has to be another…

    marcus7
    Free Member

    Awaits jivehoneys YouTube post…. 😉

    andytherocketeer
    Full Member

    correlation != causation

    kind of interesting article, but a journalist couldn’t use a statistic to save their life.

    there must be so many things that changed over a 10-20 year period (or longer) that it must be impossible to directly correlate any two curves.

    sweepy
    Free Member

    There is a very interesting chapter on lead, particularly in petrol in Bill Bryson’s book ‘A short history of nearly everything’

    Moses
    Full Member

    Not to mention the phasing out of mercury amalgam tooth fillings, due to fluoridation of water and replacement by synthetic cements.

    Cougar
    Full Member

    I’ve not read the article yet but,

    Correlation does not equal causation. That is to say, for instance, that a reduction in crime rates and a reduction in pollutants could both be symptomatic of something else; a maturing society perhaps.

    Mobile Phones, WiFi and the cancer rate has to be another…

    Has it? Why?

    Again, I’ve not looked it up yet, but if cancer incidence per capita has increased (has it?) then my gut reaction would be to attribute that to an improvement in diagnostic skills.

    Cougar
    Full Member

    Oh, here we go.

    http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/cancerstats/incidence/all-cancers-combined/

    From that graph you can clearly see the large spike in the last 20 years where everyone got home broadband and started carrying a mobile… oh.

    jam-bo
    Full Member

    Cougar
    Full Member

    Not to mention the phasing out of mercury amalgam tooth fillings, due to fluoridation of water and replacement by synthetic cements.

    Yes, probably best not to mention that. Given that a) we haven’t – white fillings are offered for cosmetic reasons – and b) the people most vocal about any perceived health risks are the ones wanting to sell you new ones.

    Amalgam doesn’t have mercury sloshing about inside it, it’s a stable alloy.

    sweepy
    Free Member

    All fair points Cougar, I still think i’d prefer petrol without lead though.

    oldnpastit
    Full Member

    The research shows some pretty close levels of correlation, for example in the US, state-by-state, as lead was removed from petrol at different times in different states, so crime rates fell at different times.

    jimoiseau
    Free Member

    People will come up with pretty much any other explanation they can find to avoid admitting that this is the real reason behind it.

    footflaps
    Full Member

    correlation != causation

    No, but pretty much all of epidemiology relies on using correlations to figure out what is going on as human biology is so complex you can’t just identify the cause from cold.

    Rockape63
    Free Member

    You’ve reminded me of a book by Steven Levitt called ‘Freakonomics’.

    He mentioned a few things like the removal of lead in petrol causing a reduction in the crime rate. However the biggest issue he raised was the claim that the legalisation of abortion in the States made a huge impact on the crime levels 15-20 years after it was introduced.

    gwaelod
    Free Member

    I remember reading something about lead in wine and drinking water being linked to decline of Roman civilisation.

    rocketman
    Free Member

    midlifecrashes
    Full Member

    CRT tellies and PC monitors? 1995 ish must have been “Peak CRT” Or maybe it’s due to the rise in overpriced coffee vs instant?

    andytherocketeer
    Full Member

    More likely to be due to Wimpy being ousted as the UK burger place of choice in the 80’s and replaced by Mcdonalds and Burger King in much greater numbers.

    Crime stats will have an approximate 10 yr lag of course, cos all the kids being fed Happy Meals for birthday treats instead of ice cream and jelly, probably aren’t going to be crime stats until late teens / early twenties.

    Thatcher nuking milk in schools must have added to that general increase in intelligence, better exam results, and eventually reduced crime stats.

    😉

    midlifecrashes
    Full Member

    Hang on, when did disc brakes appear on mountain bikes? There’s Hope for us all!

    footflaps
    Full Member

    There’s Hope for us all!

    ISWYDT

    gwaelod
    Free Member

    29ers cause cancer

    I knew it

    Pigface
    Free Member

    Every time I used Octane Booster I went on a rampage 😉

    WackoAK
    Free Member

    20 years where everyone got home broadband and started carrying a mobile… oh.

    That graph needs to be adjusted to incorporate age? We are living longer = higher chance of cancer. Also, detection rates are much better.

    Can’t believe no-one has posted the pirate/global warming graph yet…

    molgrips
    Free Member

    there must be so many things that changed over a 10-20 year period (or longer) that it must be impossible to directly correlate any two curves.

    The article is worth a read. They did more than just plot a couple of graphs. They did it for lots of countries and the correlation is extremely strong. So unless something else happened at the exact same time lead was phased out in the different countries (which was at different times), it’s definitely something to consider.

    gwaelod
    Free Member

    Monbiot (yes I know) has more on it here

    http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jan/07/violent-crime-lead-poisoning-british-export

    The hypothesis does seem a bit more robust than a coarse population level correlation though.

    brooess
    Free Member

    This story has only come about in the first year of 650B, you’ll notice… the new wheel size will save the world!

    Radio 4 had a programme on this on Monday where Michael Howard was trying to take credit for his focus on imprisoning people in the 90’s (even though this reduction in crime is a global trend). The more sensible commentators pointed to a whole range of factors which could all be partially linked to the fall in crime, rather than one single, definitive cause e.g. the cost of consumer electronics falling makes them worth less on the black market therefore not worth mugging and burgling in the first place… also, it’s cheap enough for people to buy for themselves rather than nicking it.

    I suspect in the UK at least it’s because would-be criminals are now too fat to get out of the house to go and nick your stuff…

    ohnohesback
    Free Member

    And there I was thinking that this would be a parody of the latest nanny state propaganda correlating the rise in alcohol price with a fall in A&E visits involeving violent alcohol related crime…

    andytherocketeer
    Full Member

    650B, … the new wheel size

    650b is not new

    I still reckon it’s the increase in iceberg lettuce and sesame seeds in kids’ diets

    footflaps
    Full Member

    imprisoning people in the 90’s

    I’d have thought they’d be too old and frail to cause much crime….

    IGMC

    Tom_W1987
    Free Member

    No, but pretty much all of epidemiology relies on using correlations to figure out what is going on as human biology is so complex you can’t just identify the cause from cold.

    Epidemiology uses a number of techniques to try to differentiate between correlation and causation.

    Linking mobile phone use and cancer together just because both have seen rises in the past 20 years is not “epidemiology”.

    alpin
    Free Member

    the GF goes on about “weichmacher”, or soft maker, something they put in plastic to make it soft. supposedly causes infertility in men which is fine by me as i don’t want kids. but it is linked to the increase in mens fertility over the last few decades.

    nedrapier
    Full Member

    And Innospec, the company that makes the lead additive (tetraethyl lead), got a big old fine a few yers ago for bribing Indonesian officials to sytmie the legislation that would ban leaded petrol. I’m pretty sure they’re the only company in the world that makes it.

    I had a look round their factory in the beautiful Ellesmere Port a little while ago. The sludge pit made it into my top 3 places I hope never to fall into.

    DrP
    Full Member

    I’ve got this up in my surgery, just to, you know, scare the masses….

    DrP

    Cougar
    Full Member

    the GF goes on about “weichmacher”, or soft maker… supposedly causes infertility in men

    Clue’s in the name. (-:

    She’s talking about plasiciser, by the sounds of it. Not something I’ve come across before (as a health scare).

    richmtb
    Full Member

    Its quite and interesting article and it does look like they might have something beyond a simple correlation.

    Difficult to see how it could be proved definitively though without deliberately poisoning a bunch children and then seeing how they get on in 20 years time.

    mrmo
    Free Member

    plasiciser

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasticizer

    There are some questions, not sure if there are any definitive answers though.

    Cougar
    Full Member

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasticizer#Effect_on_health

    Substantial concerns have been expressed over the safety of some plasticizers, especially because several ortho-phthalates have been classified as potential endocrine disruptors with some developmental toxicity reported.[8]

    … where [8] is an offline resource so I can’t check it. A bit more googling finds a few articles,

    http://www.babycentre.co.uk/a1037227/plasticizers-phthalates-and-bisphenol-a-bpa

    … is a good read and seems fairly balanced.

    Tom_W1987
    Free Member

    crankboy
    Free Member

    lead free petrol , legal abortion ,cheaper more accessible consumer goods and ready access to online porn, combine to achieve more in crime reduction than any punitive government policy.

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 46 total)

The topic ‘Lead in petrol and the crime rate’ is closed to new replies.