How Monbiot makes the mental leap from ‘suggestions to reduce legislative red tape’ to ‘oh noes, they’ll scrap every single environmental law!1’ I have no idea.
He should know you can’t “scrap” statute; whats more likely is that parts of particular Acts will be contained in fewer over-arching Acts instead, and given how complicated the Acts he mentioned it would never happen in reality.
AIUI its purpose is to combine all the similar regs / SI’s / etc for particular areas – a random search for ‘goat’ brings up 3 pages 😯 – I wonder what ‘tax’ brings up?
If I CBA (which I can’t) I’d tell him they’re INclosure acts not ENclosure acts; just another example of it being a typical Guardian / Monbiot article that contains just enough truths to help obscure the ‘errors’ and grammatical trickery. Ho hum 🙂