I’ll direct this at THM, as I know my honourable friend disagrees with me.
I think I may have worked out my problem with the exhortations to “accept the result”. It makes Britain look like one of these tinpot “democratic” dictatorships. You know the ones. They have a vote, which may or may not have been rigged, and then everyone has to accept it as the new president declares himself head of state for all eternity. (I’m not saying the June 23rd vote was rigged by the way – unless someone has other information, it wasn’t.)
I neither accept nor reject the vote. The vote happened. It was 51.9:48.1 leave. It doesn’t need accepting or rejecting it is a mere fact. Nothing more or less.
The interesting thing is what you do with that vote, that fact.
In the tinpot dictatorship you are told, the vote has happened the President is for life, get used to it.
But that is not democracy, is it?
Now pause for a moment and reflect.
Done that.
No a true democracy is one where we say, there was a vote, now what does that mean? Do we still mean that? How do we challenge it? A true democracy is one where we say “I wholly disapprove of what you say—and will defend to the death your right to say it.”*
And that has been missing. The press have tried to clamp down on remoaners and Bremoaners and enemies of the people. The 48% have been denied there right to speak.
And perhaps it is different on here, and perhaps, Jamba, that is why you are reaping the whirlwind.
But this is not democracy we are seeing in this country. This is democracy’s slowly cooling corpse.
*there are other versions of that quote