1) It's not *stronger* no, it just has less wasted material – meaning all parts of the beam are equally close to failure, rather than wasted section where some of it wouldnt ever fail before the another. What tapering/butting allows you to do is reduce weight. It might be considered stronger if you had to calculate involving self-weight (very large structures or complex loading). For bars etc, tapering/butting just allows weight reduction for the same strength. But you will sacrifice rigidity by tapering, as all the material is now loaded more greatly.
2) Again, far too complex to give definitive answers without knowing the items in question and the loading mechanism, but ultimately if you take a hydroformed tube you thin the walls to make a larger diam, this'll be more rigid and lighter (than a smaller diam tube with the same rigidity) but if loaded properly will not be weaker and will indeed transfer some of the load down the tube to where it is thicker (top of the head thoughts, might require a re-think). But that'll all be variable based on things like what are the other tubes like, what are the proportions of things, where are they welded to a suspension pivot…etc etc