Has been asked many a time but I’m still undecided…help me!!!
Currently have an old Sub 5. 100mm up front and 120 back. Its knackered. The Canyon’s look great value for money.
The riding I do is mainly trail centre and Surrey hills. Currently building a 456 carbon for the hills and winter but think will want full sus for summer and trail centres. Possibly odd bit of Scotland, Alps, north eng thrown in too. All of that (including mega avalanche) have been done on Sub 5 but now think something with a bit more travel (up front at least) is needed.
I want a bike which has similar feel to my old Orange but more travel and cheaper than the current Orange range. I still want it to have a ‘pop’ when going over jumps….not a feel of soaking everything up.
Will the AM be too much? I was thinking it would be perfect with 140 talas but this year’s version has 150. I’ve heard you can often lose the ‘feel for the trail’ on the flatter bit etc and that 140 was the sweet spot and 150 is too much. Could I get away with more air in the forks?
I know not much difference in weight and both great spec. In fact sure will be happy with either but keep changing mind between the two and because I cant test ride them will always have, what if, moments!
Help me avoid that and in making my decision please!