Home › Forums › Chat Forum › Audio buffs – what's your system?
- This topic has 81 replies, 47 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by gofasterstripes.
-
Audio buffs – what's your system?
-
HohumFree Member
Densen beat 200 pre-amp
Tag 100P power amp
Neat Motive SE2 loudspeakersMy CD player is a Musical Fidelity A3.5 which I hardly use now as I have ripped all my CDs to flac and stream them via a Sonos and Schiit Bifrost DAC.
I am very pleased with the way it sounds at the moment.
RichPennyFree MemberErm. 😳
Ready NAS Duo
Naim NDS
Naim XPS2
Naim NAC252
Naim Supercap
Naim NAP300
Naim 300PS
Naim Ovator S600Erm 😳
Naim HDX as a UPNP server
Naim UnitiErm 😳
A Sondek and a Planar 3 in the loft. With some amps. And a crossover. And another PSU. And some IBLs.
Jesus.
*Hides from wife*
Anna-BFree MemberNaim CDS2, XPS, 200/282, Intros. Regar Planar 2. About to all go into storage along with my CDs and LPs, and my hifi will be an iPod for the next few years. Gone temporarily, but not forgotten…
B.A.NanaFree MemberMichell Syncro Deck
Cambridge CD
Musical Fidelity Amp
Speakers are some Dannish make, name escapes me, begins with A, I think.HadgeFree MemberOrbe SE/SME V/Koetsu Rosewood Sig
Linn LP12/Zeta/Koetsu BlackWavestream Phono stage
Naim CDS3/552PS
Naim NAC252 with Supercap
Naim NAP300B&W PM1 speakers
Also have a cheap Rotel amp/cd player with JPW speakers too.
budgierider67Full MemberMeridian 506.24
Rega Planar 3
Meridian 501.2
Meridian 556
Royd DoubletsgofasterstripesFree MemberStuff that’s not changed: azur 540R V1/CDP-NS900v/Refoamed AE 109s on paving slabs/QED 79 Strand [It’s the odd number that makes it good, right?]/XLPS-V3/Planar 3/Ortofon 2M Red
I do have 2 new finds though:
BT 1KW mains conditioner “Property of British Telecom” £3
Mordaunt Short CS-1 £1Excuse the mess, we’re moving in a couple of weeks 🙂
Bad news is I broke a binding post on the AEs wedging tinned 79 Strand in there 🙁
MrWoppitFree MemberNAIM.
CDX2
NAC202
NAP200
XPS
“HICAP”
NAPSC
Isoblue support rack
NAIM NACA5 (pointed in the right direction, natch)
Graham’s Hydra
ProAc D15 speakers.Message ends.
gofasterstripesFree MemberI’m trying to buy some Allison LS-120s – anyone heard them or any other Allison stuff?
Also – my dude downstairs has a Slim Devices Squeezebox, it sounds godly. You lot should really check them out.
crouiskFree MemberPC Spotify over wifi to Airport Express via Airfoil
and then toslink into music fidelity v-dac
Audiolab 8000A
Mission 702e
Rega Planar 3 / rb300 / Linn K9
Arcam Alpha 1
Tannoy SFX subMrNuttFree Memberoriginal wax cylinders, read by 17 green & blue lasers, this is picked up and transcoded into a raw digital format which is all processed on a 100% solid state air cooled (non forced) custom built audio processor which then sends the signal via oxygen free cryogenically treated directional nordorst valhalla cable to a series of six hand wired custom built mono block valve amplifiers (this is a two channel system, three amps per side, high, mid and low frequencies). The amplifiers as well as the all other electrical equipment is run directly from a bank of dedicated batteries (the system has a fail safe that means it can’t be operated whilst the batteries are charging). The amplifiers feed the two three horn arrays which are all driven by electrostatically agitated mercury. I won’t tell you how much it cost, but it sounds shit.
jon773Free MemberPortable stuff[/u]
Shure SE535 with ACS Custom molds
Etymotic ER4P
Grado PS500
iPod Classic
Fostex HP-P1 DAC/AmpComputer[/u]
Asus Xonar Essence STX sound card
Monitor Audio BX5a near field monitorsThe-Swedish-ChefFree MemberAudio Analogue Paganini CD player -> Yamaha S500 Amp, MS 10i classic bookshelf speakers, fancy cabling.
grantmccall63Free MemberArcam AVR 400 amp
Arcam Alpha 7 CD
Tannoy Eyris 2’s Floorstanders
BK XXLS 400 SubthreeekFree MemberFanless home made media PC
M2 Tech Hiface USB to S/PDIF
Chord DAC 64
Krell KAV-400xi amp
Anthony Gallo Ref 3 SA bass amp
Anthony Gallo Ref 3 speakers
Very understanding wifeGileseyFree MemberMac Mini -> HiFiMeDIY Sabre USB DAC -> Topping TP20 Mk2 -> eltax Liberty3+ speakers
Cheap, cheap, cheap but so sweet sounding for mp3/iplayer/internet radio sources, which is pretty much all I listen to these days.
TiRedFull MemberSonus Faber speakers matching centre and surround
Related subwoofer
Onkyo receiver
Quad 303
Sony 7700ES CD/DVD
Radio via Freesat
ITunes streamed as FLACUsed to run the speakers with a Music Fidelity A1 that now needs new caps.
Forget amplifiers, buy the nicest speakers you can afford. ATC for active.
dmortsFull MemberJCL had a point earlier…
So out of interest, has anyone acoustically treated the room they have their system in? The room is part of the system
gofasterstripesFree MemberNo, and I know that it’s a problem. I have a 8*4m room as a listening room. The audio fires across one end, the speakers a meter out from the wall and my seat quite close to the opposite one [head 30cm from it]. This gets me hefty deep bass reinforcemt [Chase and Status has the whole room throbbing] – actually, it’s great. The room has relatively thin, plastered walls, and a bare ceiling.
There is a problem though, as soon as the music is turned up beyond talking volume, it starts to get progressively more shrill.
When you clap loudly in that room, you can hear the echo for more than half a second, so what it needs is wall-hung rugs or such across most of the listening end. I would imagine that I would get much less room interaction then?
MrSmithFree MemberI had to change my speakers because of the room, PMC TB2’s were just too much for quite a small space, I couldn’t bring them out any further to drop the bass and they only sounded o.k. If I sat up and forward on the edge of the sofa. Sat back was like sitting in a fuzzy sub woofer.
Now got a tiny pair of Leema xeros that integrate much better with the room.CountZeroFull MemberA lot of ATC love on this thread
Probably a lot of pfm’ers, tooWhat, fans of 80’s Italian Prog-rock? 😯
zokesFree MemberMrNutt – Member
bike? isn’t this a coffee forum?
Once upon a time, yes. But why would there need to be a coffee forum when I can get the same crema and flavour from some Tesco Smartprice instant as you can from a single provenance, small-batch roasted, burr-ground, Gaggia-made espresso.
That is sort of what you were getting at with your post about high-end hifi, was it now?
dmortsFull MemberThere is a problem though, as soon as the music is turned up beyond talking volume, it starts to get progressively more shrill.
When you clap loudly in that room, you can hear the echo for more than half a second, so what it needs is wall-hung rugs or such across most of the listening end. I would imagine that I would get much less room interaction then?
You could kill two birds with one stone and put up some absorption at the first reflection points (walls and ceiling), this would help reduce the overall reverberation too.
gofasterstripesFree MemberAaah – yes, that’s what I mean! I shall in the next flat I’m moving to in a couple of weeks 🙂
lodiousFree MemberRoom treatment makes a massive difference, it doesn’t cost much, and it takes a bit of effort, but if you are serious about improving the quality of your system (and not just into throwing cash at buying boxes), it’s a no brainer.
chiefgrooveguruFull MemberThere’s only so much you can do to deal with a room, especially at low frequencies where traps have to be huge. The dipole approach of the Orion (Linkwitz’s design with open baffle midrange with front and rear firing tweeters and H-frame open baffle woofers) has much more consistent power response (sum of all on and off-axis output) from low to high, which improves the consistency of the direct and reflected sound.
http://www.linkwitzlab.com/orion-rev4.htm
If the reflected sound is delayed by a sufficient (but not too great) amount and is sufficiently similar to the direct sound then the brain ignores it.
Another approach pioneered by Earl Geddes uses big pro-sound woofers (12″ in his least compromised current model) crossed over to huge oblate spheroid waveguides. These are placed firing diagonally in, with their tightly controlled dispersion causing hugely reduced wall reflections. As you can’t control the dispersion at low frequencies (unless you use arrays the size of your house) the lows are then produced by multiple active subwoofers, each with independent control of level, cut-off and phase – by having multiple subs you can energise all the different room modes more evenly, resulting in smoother LF response. The main speakers are in sealed enclosures and run without highpass filtering so they too act as LF sources up in the 80Hz+ region.
http://www.gedlee.com/abbey.htm
http://www.gedlee.com/Subs.htmUnfortunately the Gedlee designs don’t fit terribly well in small western European homes, being better aesthetically suited to huge US or Scandinavian houses, even though small rooms are where the acoustic benefits are greatest! Hopefully we’ll see mainstream manufacturers start to focus more on polar response because it matters far more than people realise.
gofasterstripesFree MemberCGG – I have a Q for you that I meant to ask last time we conversed.
Can I copy the values of the components in my speaker’s crossovers but with lower power handling components to create a x-over to put before my amp – and turn my speakers active
I am also assuming that I can’t actually use the x-overs from inside the speakers – there are two inductors that look like 200W toroidal transformers and I guess they won’t work at such low signal levels correctly?
chiefgrooveguruFull MemberNo you definitely can’t! The response of a crossover depends upon the load it’s driving – the impedance of a loudspeaker varies hugely in magnitude and phase, so a crossover designed based on an overly simplified resistive model won’t work at all (so instead of a speaker varying between 4 and 50 ohms the simplified design assumes a constant 8 ohms).
With line level crossovers the load you’ll be driving will be a few kohms, so all the values would be many orders of magnitude out. You can make passive line level crossovers but it’s hard to go past first order with them. True active crossovers drive an essentially constant impedance load and use op-amp based circuits (or DSP).
I wouldn’t do any crossover design without a measurement suite that can precisely measure magnitude and phase of impedance and SPL. And for the SPL measurements you’d need something that can do gated measurements for quasi-anechoic response or a big outdoor space and a still day.
dmortsFull Memberespecially at low frequencies where traps have to be huge
Traditionally yes, but there is something called the Compound Baffle Absorber which looks interesting for taming low frequencies in small spaces. I’ve seen that a few people have managed to DIY them on recording studio forums.
Also I made a tunable acoustic absorber out of a loudspeaker for my MSc project. The loudspeaker acts as a membrane and can be tuned by the addition of resistors and caps across the terminals.
gofasterstripesFree MemberCheers.
Would this circuit be good enough it’s OpAmp based, but doesn’t have phase shift.
m1keaFree MemberFLAC off a Readynas – Beresford Cayman DAC – SB Duet – Denon AVR1800 amp -> MA Bronze speakers
Have only ever owned one CD player, a Marantz CD52 which I brought in 1991. Tis still connected up
I used to chat with a guy on a car audio forum years ago and he was seriously into his acoustic treatments. I still have his spreadsheet dealing with room acoustics and mode points.
Never put anything in place but shout if anyone wants a copy.
m1keaFree Membergofasterstripes – Member
Yes please.
sam{d0t}firth{?t}gmail{d0t}com
It’s at work so I’ll ping you a copy tomorrow.
chiefgrooveguruFull MemberWould this circuit be good enough it’s OpAmp based, but doesn’t have phase shift.
It’s the right kind of circuit but you don’t know what else is going on in your speakers other than the low and highpass filtering of the crossovers – there might be notch filters, there’s certainly some baffle-step compensation. And the slopes on that circuit are very steep, much steeper than the passive crossover in your speaker will be – not a bad thing but certainly different. I don’t think I’d try to turn a passive speaker into an active speaker – you’d be better off designing a speaker from scratch (this will require a few years of learning!) or building a DIY active speaker kit (your best bet by far!)
The topic ‘Audio buffs – what's your system?’ is closed to new replies.