Forum menu
I'd own one in a heartbeat if I had that sort of affordability.
I'd own one in a heartbeat if I had that sort of affordability.
A house in Lancashire? Me too. Couldn't give a shit about the car though.
I think they're excellent
Generally only bought by petrolheads rather than posers, not noticed by the average joe, sound glorious, and can be driven as your only car
If I had enough money to justify it I've have one. If I had enough money to cover anything going wrong in a 2nd hand one I'd have a second hand one (or an E63 or M5)
When considering the running costs, let's be fair. A house costs a lot to run, and you can sleep in the boot of the RS6.
I probably wouldn't buy one (not unless I had silly amounts of money) but most of the downsides aren't really. Poor fuel economy - well OK I'll cycle places more (And let's be fair, the quoted fuel economy is pretty impressive for a car with that level of performance - you'd be looking at a similar ball park figure out of a camper van and no one would judge you as an earth murderer for that). Leather seats and frightened of spilling things on them - much as I wouldn't choose leather (vegetarian) I had a car with full leather, and child vomit and food came out of it no problem, unlike cloth interiors where I have to apply my don't give a crap filter.
In terms of it not handling well on track, fine, it won't be as nice as a lightweight sports car on track. It'll be a lot more practical on the road though. And you can exercise your children's neck muscles.
I'd own one in a heartbeat if I had that sort of affordability.
I couldn't afford you.
If I had the cash I would buy one, and then spend an extra £5k on the Litchfield performance pack to take it to 750bhp.
Don't ask me to explain why, because I cant, I just would!
Maybe that's a better question,
If you had £100k to spend on a car, which car would you buy instead? I mean, it's nice enough and all, but is that the best spend? Dunno as it'd be my first choice.
100k to spend on a car? A vito for the bikes and a nissan gtr for the making progress, should come to about 100k
CougarMaybe that's a better question,
If you had £100k to spend on a car, which car would you buy instead? I mean, it's nice enough and all, but is that the best spend? Dunno as it'd be my first choice.
Not a lot. There's the AMG CLS Shooting Brake, Jag XF RS and Porsche are bringing out the Panmera Superturismo but that's about it. Audi have the super estate thing covered. The new M5 is lovely but no estate version yet.
The whole [i]"you could buy a house for that"[/i] argument is a bit redundant when the clock option in a Bentley Bentayga is £115,000. So if you've got £275,000 to fritter you could buy a Bentley and an RS6, or a Bentley with optional solid gold clock. And that's just chump change compared to the upper end of the Bugatti, Ferrari, McLaren, RR catalogue.
[i]Funny, I thought P-Jay couldn't have been further from the truth of the matter.[/i]
I agree. But then (funnily enough), people own/want/need different things for different reasons, I believe.
How many bikes can you chuck in the back of a (hideous) [i]nissan gtr[/i]?
It's a lot of money for "just a car" sure, but one man's meat is another man's pornography. How much have you lot all spent on pushbikes?
Total, since 1991: £100, £400, £400, £700, £650, £650, £200. So, about £3k. Minus about £300 from selling one, plus about £300 above the insurance payout replacing one that was nicked.
Slightly surprised it was that much; it's £700 more than our current car cost us 3 years ago 🙂
I'd be wanting at least an 8 figure balance on my current account before buying a car at that sort of price.
So I'd probably be able to buy Lancashire.
If you had £100k to spend on a car, which car would you buy instead?
A 2nd hand van for bikes and family duties. And then if pushed to get something quick, then would 90k get me an old race-something or other car, race license, tyres, fuel and spares for a year?
Pointless wrapping up speed and functionality in one. I'd want to race, not pose/ stealth pose.
I'd be wanting at least an 8 figure balance on my current account before buying a car at that sort of price.
remember chatting to a bloke (kid, really) in the pub once who was bragging about his £100k watch. He certainly wasn't worth 8 figures, and probably not all that far above 7.
Commenting later to a friend that I'd want to be worth a sight more than this guy before I spent 100k on a watch, the friend retorted that he'd want to be a philanthropist before he did.... Fair point...
In answering my own question - less than I imagined:
http://www.graduates.org.uk/info.asp?s=startRacing
So no way would I want an expensive 'thing' of a car when there's some proper fun to be had in this world, if cars were to float my boat.
Wait around 3 years and one of these could be had for £50k, or you could buy a 2-3 year old RS4 for £30k, roughly the same price as a reasonably species up new Mondeo.
Having only last week watched someone trying to get their Lamborghini over a series of speed bumps (in the sort of place in Lancashire where you could buy the alternative house) I'd say that this would be of considerably more use to you than one of them. Unless you live in Monaco.
It really was quite hilarious. Well... all the kids who were pointing at him and laughing certainly seemed to think so 🙂
A £100K car says to me about the owner - 'I could have bought a really nice car for £50K and done some real good with the other £50K instead. But I'm a rich flash **** so I didn't'.
If you had £100k to spend on a car, which car would you buy instead?
Can I cheat and have 2 for my money? Or even 3. A nice boring comfy shopper/commuter with disposable doors for the supermarket car park and alloys because my wife will also drive it; a dirty old landy for bikes, tip runs and boys adventures; and a stupidly light and small silly thing for the weekends (elise/caterham/atom). Nothing on my list is great for crossing continents.......but I don't cross continents as a rule.
A £100K car says to me about the owner - 'I could have bought a really nice car for £50K and done some real good with the other £50K instead. But I'm a rich flash **** so I didn't'.
Or I could have spent a million quid on a car but I'm from yorkshire.
km79A £100K car says to me about the owner - 'I could have bought a really nice car for £50K and done some real good with the other £50K instead. But I'm a rich flash * so I didn't'.
Yeah. *s. Come to think of it, you can get a perfectly good car for £500 so anyone who spends more than that is a rich flash ****. Even that's a bit flash when you can get an excellent mountain bike for £70 from Tesco.
Houses too are obnoxious, ostentatious displays of wealth. A caravan should suffice for most people. If you've spent £100,000 on a house, when you could have spent £10,000 on a caravan and done some real good with the £90,000 you are subhuman scum.
Houses too are obnoxious, ostentatious displays of wealth.
For a growing number of people, yes I agree.
[quote="Doris5000"]remember chatting to a bloke (kid, really) in the pub once who was bragging about his £100k watch. He certainly wasn't worth 8 figures, and probably not all that far above 7.So just spent a significant percentage of his net worth on a watch. Hope it was extremely exclusive and likely to appreciate.
Funnily enough, thats what our "lottery win" plans look like these days.Commenting later to a friend that I'd want to be worth a sight more than this guy before I spent 100k on a watch, the friend retorted that he'd want to be a philanthropist before he did.... Fair point...
Pah my dad owns a motorbike worth more than that 8) I think Pjay hits the nail on the head, Audi RS's bought by people who think they are into cars and watch too many top gear episodes on dave
Can someone explain the pretty colours on the map of the UK on the previous page please ( a cry for help from a div )
My old boss has an RS4, fast, quiet till its floored, comfy, safe , thirsty.
A £100K car says to me about the owner - 'I could have bought a really nice car for £50K and done some real good with the other £50K instead. But I'm a rich flash **** so I didn't'.
What if he's already spent 10x that giving to charity? Should people with nice cars/houses/bikes display their charitable donations in the window?
What car can bill gates drive?
Can someone explain the pretty colours on the map of the UK on the previous page please
The map shows annual rainfall in mm I think.
What if he's already spent 10x that giving to charity?
Sexist!
What car can bill gates drive?
Anything he likes but I will still think he is a rich flash ****.
Each to their own but it wouldn't be for me (first world problem alert) since it's isn't easy to fit or insure one with a towbar (no bike rack on the back 🙁 ).
I don't particularly see what the issue with this form of spending compared to spending huge amounts on a home or even more so second home. I guess it's just more visible consumption. I'd also agree that this country is growing more disequal which will be a huge issue for generations.
Audi RS's bought by people who think they are into cars and watch too many top gear episodes on dave
Or how about by people who need a car to cart around the family, dog and a couple of mountain bikes but would also like to drive something thats fast, rare and capable (talking about the RS Avants here). Granted for the same money they could buy a Range Rover but perhaps they like to drive the thing and hate the whole blingy footballers wives image that buying an SUV entails.
I reckon there are people who spend as much on a bike as I do on a car. Who cares? Better to spend it and keep someone in employment than stick it under the pillow.
Audi RS's bought by people who think they are into cars and watch too many top gear episodes on dave
😀 yes; the "cool dads"
There'd always be one lad at school who'd have a "cool dad" - you know the sort; matching Audi jacket and is unable to drive a car without wearing a pair of Oakleys. Utter cretins.