[Closed] Wimbledon Andy Murray Content

Ooh, bugger 😳

I meant to say "two grand slam event trophies" so I'll accept that correction. 🙂

Has anyone mentioned that Tennis is really dull.

Nah - I wouldn't accept it. Grand slams clearly indicates grand slam trophies, whereas grand slam would imply that it was holding all four at the same time. That based on the idea that you cant have two of the latter at the same time. Shoddy bit of editing by IanMunro.

Tennis, dull?

Never mind, you can frotter youself against the furniture when Top Gear comes on in a bit.

😀

Oh I'm sure Ian knew what I meant anyway... 😉

So, a Lions win, a Wimbledon win, now what?

Hmm, what about another win in a little bike race, and perhaps a nice series win in the Ashes as well? 🙂

Or how about Obree for fastest cyclist in his wee beastie?

Word on the street is that Andy Murray has donated all his winnings to the Royal Marsden.

Good on him ,close to his heart just now

Think that may be a bit of an interwebz rumour. He did, IIRC, donate his Queens winnings, however, so he is still very much a good egg on that front!

I have no idea if it's true or not.

interwebz rumours you say, is it only virtual-ly true then ? 🙂

He is more personable in real life than he comes across on screen, I saw him and his mum and his bro being interviewed for a radio program at the Museum of Scotland a few years ago, they were very relaxed and joking about.

BBC should be ashamed of some of the coverage tho, those comments about the women's winner not being good-looking were beyond a faux-pas and that dinosaur should be made extinct. Then we had 10 minutes last week about how Judy Murray has started wearing her hair differently. I know not much happens for hours on end, but please. (Women, Know Your Place, don't try to play tennis).

it is a bit meaningless to say a British player holds two slams though - it is more like Andy Murray holds two slams 'cos very little of this achievement is courtesy of backing from Britain, and there is not the strength-in-depth in British tennis to use this as a indicator that things are going the right way.

it is a bit meaningless to say a British player holds two slams though - it is more like Andy Murray holds two slams 'cos very little of this achievement is courtesy of backing from Britain, and there is not the strength-in-depth in British tennis to use this as a indicator that things are going the right way.

I wasn't commenting on any strength in depth of British tennis, just that given the dearth of success in the last goodness knows how long, it's great to see someone from these shores being successful. Seriously, who gives a shit, let's just enjoy the success.

But yeah, everything is still really shit.

My god Boris Becker is an awful commentator. Practically ruined it.

Well done Murray, he really deserves that.

I thought it was an absolutely brilliant game. He looked and played like a champion. Brilliant job, full respect.

He must be in for a great evening and few days ahead. Job done, lifetime goal achieved, no pressing engagemnts, plenty of money and no cares 🙂

SPOTY - Individual (murray) and Team (Lions) all sorted! Well done Murray and team Murray! Djok a true gent in defeat too. This could be the next great tennis rivalry for the next 5 years. Murray v Djok!!!

And prize money doated to Royal Marsden. Brilliant.

deadlydarcy - I wasn't aiming any comment at you - just the general press/media.

This could be the next great tennis rivalry for the next 5 years

hope not - hope somebody comes along that has a bit more interesting style of play - another Federer, or just someone that doesn't hit a double handed backhand!

Djok definitely took a bung to throw that match. Some of the unforced errors were appalling- he really wasn't anywhere near his usual self. Murray did play well but Djok didn't look interested in winning at all

Could not agree more TurnerGuy. It seems like generations since someone with the style of Federer dominated Wimbledon. Seriously, I thought it was a great display of power and fitness. Nobody can return shots that they have no right to like Murray and Djokovic.

Really DanW? You don't actually think that do you?

What a year it been for him, losing at Wimbledon, winning the Olympics then the US and now Wimbledon. I have to confess I thought Docov would prove too strong but Murray won in some style. He's Scottish and every right to be proud of that.

Sports Personality of the Year

The semi final Djokovic played against el Potro was a pretty long intense match maybe the best match of wimbledon? He could probably of done with another days rest...

Brilliant to see Murry winning it though.

>Djok definitely took a bung to throw that match. <

Most idiotic post so far - congratulations.

Well done AM.

Ok, so I got it across a little strongly but something didn't feel right with how Djok was playing in terms of his attitude and unforced errors. For example there were quite a few times when Djok was right at the net with an open court, weak return from Murray and somehow he plays it in to the net. Maybe he was exhausted and the strength of Murray showed it but Djokovic really wasn't himself.

Maybe the fact it was 40 degrees in centre court? Or because he played a 5 hour semi final on Friday? He may have been carrying an injury.. The list goes on DanW.

I seem to remember Murray missing some easy shots aswell.. Maybe he took a bribe to miss them?

Ditch the tin foil hat and just be happy for the man!

You would be gloating if he lost, so because he won its a conspiracy?

You could see Djokovic was trying and getting angry at some of the calls.. Can't we just celebrate British success? Why does there have to be a conspiracy? Just accept that Andy played the better Tennis on the day and wanted it more.

Plus he donated his prize money to the cancer hospital his friend was treated in.. All round top bloke in my opinion.

Did Murray actually manage to bust out a smile?

I only watched for about 10 mins after the end of the match and he didn't look like he was very close during that time.

Does it matter if he smiled (he did though).. He is payed to play tennis not smile at cameras, buy celebrity magazines if you want to see smiley faces.

Someone smiling for wattsy earlier

[img] [/img]

Nice one Binners..

Thanks for that!

Not a huge tennis fan, enjoy playing it but watching is not my thing. Huge congratulations to Andy Murray, a brilliant performance. The pressure to win it must of been huge. Very happy for him.

Its like the Lions winning, some people saying that Australia werent very good and now people are saying Djokovic threw it FFS there are some miserable sods around.

Who was that sweaty little fat man in the suit standing behind Dave and shouting like he was on Songs of Praise ?

can someone explain what Murray has to do to become world No.1 as hes still number 2 after beating number 1? not as simple as that obviously??

do you have to win a number of grand slams or something?

EDIT: Googled http://www.atpworldtour.com/Rankings/Rankings-FAQ.aspx#pointvalue

Now I'm no tennis expert so feel free to flame away. I like Murray, he is a great player (aren't they all at this level) that you can clearly see the struggles and mental pressure he is under while playing. There is no doubt he has worked very hard to be where he is, he deserves his win. What I also like about him is that he is his own man, no need to play at the celebrity or suck up to anyone. His is what he is take it or leave it.
Now those that would like to criticize him, what did you win yesterday?

Someone smiling for wattsy earlier

She's made me smile too 🙂

I know nothing about tennis but I could see that yesterday was a superb effort, hats off to him.

Never liked all the daft hype thrown out as soon as Murray wins his first match ("He's going to be champion!"), but this time he really came up with the goods. And he didn't blub, thankfully.

can someone explain what Murray has to do to become world No.1 as hes still number 2 after beating number 1? not as simple as that obviously??

do you have to win a number of grand slams or something?

They tried to explain this in the commentary. Basically, each position you come where you beat the position you came in the same competition the previous year, you get some points. As Djok didn't get to the final last year, he got points for just turning up yesterday, whereas Andy wouldn't have got those as he lost in the final last year. He obviously got lots of points for beating Djok, but not enough to bridge the gap.

There's 19 tournaments that are used for the calculation so 1 win won't be enough to propel anyone to the top. Also as it is a ranking you need to equal your performance the previous year just to stay put. At Wimbledon both payers bettered their performance last year so both will have effectively moved up a bit.

Organic - yes it's a points based system rather than a cookers-style system!

Rather than general trolling, time would be better spent learning from what it takes to be #1 in the world either as an individual (Murray) or as an event (the Wimbledon Championship). Unfortunately much of the needed lessons fly in the face of modern thinking and get distorted by prejudice and other factors.

But there are clear lessons not only in the journey but perhaps the hardest bit - going from nearly the best, to the very best. So much sacrifice and effort have gone into a simple tennis match that it is easy to forget what is involved.

FWIW, yes, Murray had some breaks with how the draw panned out and Djok must have felt the effects of the del Potro match. Plus I thought that Murray was not at his best in some of the earlier matches. But when it can to the final, he was imperious and magnificent.

Sir Andy Murray and Sir Leigh Haflpenny. Not we need something from NI (gmac or Mcilroy in the Open) and England (Cook's forthcoming double centuries against the Aussies, Lee Westwood at the open) to make the full house!

can someone explain what Murray has to do to become world No.1 as hes still number 2 after beating number 1? not as simple as that obviously??

do you have to win a number of grand slams or something?

Well done to Murray, great achievement moreso given the pressure added by the history of British players at the tournament. But if the future of major finals for the next few years is Murray vs Djokovich then I dont think I'll be watching much of it. Fom a players perspective you need to do what you need to to win which is all well and good but history aside it was not an enthralling game to watch.

history aside it was not an enthralling game to watch

You what?

The tennis was phenomenal! Either you or I know absolutely nothing about tennis!

history aside it was not an enthralling game to watch

The tennis was phenomenal!