Forum menu
How much of a vote loser is that really outside rural areas (about which Lab don't care as they don't vote Lab)?
Do only rural people eat chicken? Food standards affect everyone - it's not about protecting farmers, it's about protecting consumers from sub-standard food.
Larry Elliott.
I wondered when that serial tosspot would get another run out in the Graun.
It's all very well now saying how the government must neuter the threat of Farage by doing x or y. The fact is, Elliott backed the single most important thing that empowered the likes of Farage. He backed setting fire to the house, now he's advising the fire brigade how to put it out.
But apart from that did you like the article?
@morecashthandash @the-muffin-man The issue might be that there's a subset of people who want cheaper food and don't care about either animal welfare (which is why they have to wash the chicken with chlorine in the first place) or quality. How big that group is, and what their voting preferences are, I don't know.
@morecashthandash @the-muffin-man The issue might be that there's a subset of people who want cheaper food and don't care about either animal welfare (which is why they have to wash the chicken with chlorine in the first place) or quality. How big that group is, and what their voting preferences are, I don't know.
A fair comment, I'm probably reflecting the views of my middle class bubble there.
Not sure it would be THE issue thst would sway votes, but would be yet another failure of this government if they backed down.
https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/whats-really-in-uk-trump-trade-deal-3682727
Doesn't sound particularly bad on our side if this is correct
But apart from that did you like the article?
He writes the ****ing obvious and is merely a resident cyst in Farage’s colon, talks about England yet treats it like the entirety of the UK.
Another gobshite that i’d love to slap.
Food standards and digital tax are big deals for me.
The former is obvious.. But on the front of digital tax... The amount of tax mega-corps don't pay in the UK is insane.
Companies like meta, Amazon, alphabet are prime targets to 'shake down' if the UK wants to raise some tax revenue.
The daily mash informs me that in the trade deal we can now buy guns.
@morecashthandash Aye, I think it's another straw that would persuade LD/Green-leaning voters not to vote tactically for Lab.
@mattyfez No-one likes the tech giants and taxing them harder is popular, particularly when Lab have committed to not raising taxes on Hard Working People™. Cutting taxes on them to curry favour with a US regime that is itself deeply unpopular in the UK seems… inexplicable.
The fact is, Elliott backed the single most important thing that empowered the likes of Farage.
Oh FFS when are people going to stop relating everything back to brexit? Elliot's point about brexit was that it would enable the UK to break free from the neo-liberal economics enshrined in EU law and allow the state to implement policies which would boost UK industry and investment while also enabling a more equal share of the proceeds. The problem is every UK govt since brexit hasn't done that, and has doubled down on neo-liberal austerity which has got us to where we are now. It's got very little to do with brexit* and everything to do with establishment groupthink and politicians who don't give a rats ass about anything other than staying in power by keeping the top 1% happy.
*Remember how after brexit Farage disappeared into the shadows? That was because his job was done. His resurgence is a result of successive govts failing to change the status quo post-brexit.
How big that group is, and what their voting preferences are, I don't know.
The food industry?
*Remember how after brexit Farage disappeared into the shadows? That was because his job was done. His resurgence is a result of successive govts failing to change the status quo post-brexit.
Farage was just waited for Brexit to fail to deliver, then stepped forward to put forward the same lies as you… Brexit hasn’t been done wrong, it has handicapped UK companies (boo, people trying to make a living) and UK government, whatever its colour. Lots of money to be made by Farage, and for Farage, in the mess ahead of us.
Farage was just waited for Brexit to fail to deliver, then stepped forward to put forward the same lies as you…
If the position of mainstream politicians is that nothing can be improved because of brexit, then Farage will have victory delivered on a plate. Despite all their faults, the Labour leadership seem to understand that because it would be the easiest thing in the world for a passionate opponent of brexit like Starmer to blame all his problems on leaving the EU. Where's he's going wrong though is assuming the old strategies of boosting economic growth and improving the cost of living will work in a post-EU economy. They won't, and he needs to understand that and start doing something different.
Oh FFS when are people going to stop relating everything back to brexit?
But isn't Brexit the whole reason why Nigel Farage and Reform are currently doing so well?
Hatred of asylum seekers and the seductive appeal of far-right solutions is all but nonexistent in European countries which have remained in the EU, or of course in the United States.
How else would you explain the Farage/Reform phenomenon.......by the failure of neoliberalism and its centrist backers? Give me a break!
The three reasons why Nigel Farage now looks the most likely to become UK PM after the next general election are Brexit, Brexit, and Brexit. It's so simple!
If the position of mainstream politicians is that nothing can be improved because of brexit
It isn’t. Doesn’t change the fact that the position of the UK, and people living here, has been negatively impacted by Brexit, and no one is better placed to take advantage of that then Farage. It’s a frustrating irony, but true.
Hatred of asylum seekers and the seductive appeal of far-right solutions is all but nonexistent in European countries which have remained in the EU, or of course in the United States.
Is that a strawman? Some whataboutery? Both?
Doesn’t change the fact that the position of the UK, and people living here, has been negatively impacted by Brexit, and no one is better placed to take advantage of that then Farage
Doesn't make a lot of sense seeing as Farage was the primary flag waver for brexit. If it was so damaging why would he be so popular or able to take advantage? His opponents could easily point the finger in his direction and explain why everything is so shit. And yet they don't. Weird! 🤷♂️
Mandelson looks like the miserable old guy from Up
Is that a strawman?
Well I guess it depends on whether it's not true and the far-right solutions and anti-asylum rhetoric, which we all apparently hate, has indeed had traction in EU and the United States. You decide.
And here's a clue, Nigel Farage is wrong about most things.
The optics of this are great for both leaders, and Peter Mandelson with him plumby voice is such a contrast to everyone else. The is some good soft power being wielded here, it's all we've got so it's good to see.
But apart from that did you like the article?
Some of it.
He's right to divide the last 33 years into two equal blocks. He's right that warehouse and call centre jobs were a callow compensation for highly paid, unionised jobs. He fails to mention that both those extremes were/are too extreme for the balance of society and the economy. I agree that pushing for 50% of the population to be at university is too high - in fact it has led to the withering away of vocational qualifications that used to be a fantastic middle ground.
But he is far too black and white. Class has very little to do with, say, all the knee-jerk rightwing stuff amongst the supposed working class against the stricter inheritance tax rules for farmers. This was a measure that was literally closing a loophole that allowed wealthy landowners to avoid paying their fair share. But the likes of Farage only had tell many people who probably ought to want that kind of measure that it was (spit) socialism and un-British and they were all over everywhere backing "our farmers". Why were so many of the supposed working class kicking off about wealthy individuals having a loophole closed? It still is tribal, it is just that the tribes have changed.
I find Elliott's writing far too dogmatic and entrenched to pay him much regard. He tells the right time occasionally, like a stopped clock. Personally I think he is frightened about facing the realities of his political position and who he finds himself on the same side of arguments with.
That's my opinion, anyway.
Elliot's point about brexit was that it would enable the UK to break free from the neo-liberal economics enshrined in EU law and allow the state to implement policies which would boost UK industry and investment while also enabling a more equal share of the proceeds.
Do you think Aaron Banks, Jacob Rees-Mogg and Nigel Farage got his memo?
And, at what point did Larry look around him and think "these don't look like the kind of people who like giving more equal shares of anything" and "why are they banging on about immigration all the time"?
🤣
Hatred of asylum seekers and the seductive appeal of far-right solutions is all but nonexistent in European countries which have remained in the EU
Really? Isn't there far right growth across Europe?
Class has very little to do with, say, all the knee-jerk rightwing stuff amongst the supposed working class against the stricter inheritance tax rules for farmers.
That's a very niche example. If higher inheritance tax for a few farmers is the best you can come up with, then Elliot clearly has a point. The key thing I think is that the focus is now returning to economic rights and equality and away from individual rights. Individual rights are great and we (mostly) all support them, but they cost very little (the reason why many govts were so keen on promoting them) and do little to improve the lives of the majority of working people. Working people care mostly about having well paid jobs, affordable housing and utilities, a functioning health service and welfare safety net, and decent schools for their kids. Deliver those and they won't care much about things like immigration and other identity issues, and that's what politicians need to focus on.
Well, Trump got "something" from the UK Government with his hardball tariffs on cars, steel etc. In most areas the UK still hasn't got arrangements as good as we had last year though. A damage limitation deal, rather than anything better than we had before Trump. Still higher tariffs on cars when selling into the USA than we had before (10%, where it was only 2.5% before Trump IIRC). Still 10% on most other goods that used to have lower tariffs. No surprise Starmer is making so much of it. Take it with a pinch of salt though. It's better than other countries have so far... so in one way the (painful to watch) process of the UK Gov has worked... but we're still going backwards. Good to see food standards maintained as a red line, credit due there, I have little faith that would have been the case if someone else had formed a government last year.
Working people care mostly about having well paid jobs, affordable housing and utilities, a functioning health service and welfare safety net, and decent schools for their kids.
And yet so many of them say they are willing to vote Reform, and lose all that.
And yet so many of them say they are willing to vote Reform, and lose all that.
Kelvin you know as well as I that people vote to change things when the status quo isn't working, and the status quo very much isn't working at the moment. Reform may or may not change anything for the better, but people will still vote for the chance of that rather than stick with what they know isn't working.
At least Mandleson will be at ease sucking up to trumps arse, busman’s holiday for himself
That's a very niche example.
Taking the point of view that Brexit, pushed as it was by the likes of Farage and along the lines he pushed it, was likely to lead to levelling up and a fairer society is a lot more niche than that.
Larry blame-anything-but-Brexit Elliott. Rivalled only by Adrian Chiles for gutter-press-worthy-drivel articles in the Guardian. And a genius when it comes to points of view that fly in the face of what's happening - Capitalism is dead, the EU is a failure, globalisation is over, Brexit is fantastic just be patient (and it's far worse in the EU than the UK).
The EU is sclerotic and seething with voter rage at the inability of its governments to raise living standards or control immigration.
Nahh, it's mainly miserable old ****s like you, Larry. Replace two letters in that sentence and it makes a lot more sense anyhow. For 80% of miserable old ****s immigration was the key issue in September 2015 - that's what's got the UK where it is now. Really:
Elliot always has a hilarious take that flys in the face of reality
And yet so many of them say they are willing to vote Reform, and lose all that.
When the right of the Labour party fail to deliver blame the electorate when the left of the party fail - blame the leadership.
This is how it goes it appears.
Just seen badenoch's response. She really is deluded, apparently the us tariffs being triple is the fault of labour and this trade deal
Good to see food standards maintained as a red line, credit due there
I'm not sure that's actually the case. Brook Rollins, US agriculture secretary, says "all of the meats, all of the produce" are being considered for agricultural export.
Did I really just hear the UK Prime Minister say that the 80th anniversary of VE was a fitting day to celebrate the school bully not punching us in the face after nicking our lunch money?
He's making a right **** of himself in his desire to dress up a shit sandwich as something positive. A shit sandwich is still a shit sandwich, whether the bread is artisan or not.
Wtf was he meant to do. Turn round and say trump is being a dick and we don't give a toss about reducing the tariffs? Trump only responds to platitudes, it sucks that they have had to do that and I don't like starmer but still it is better than what we got shafted with
Ah yes, making a deal with a fascist, perfect way to show the world that on VE day the lessons of history will be ignored.
, US agriculture secretary, says "all of the meats, all of the produce" are being considered for agricultural export.
Seems to me they've announced the deal before the details are finalised. UK government are saying the US imports will still have to meet our standards. It can't be both.
but still it is better than what we got shafted with
Awesome so we **** our industries when they couldn't give a shit because we are tiny. Glad you have your morals, in this case I'm going with pragmatism
Seems to me they've announced the deal before the details are finalised.
As I understand it they have announced what has been agreed so far and there are further negotiations to be carried out.
Trump and the oligarchs will not stop just because Starmer rolled over to have his tummy tickled.
Giving fascists any victory is failure, and the people in the UK, EU and the ROTW will pay a heavier cost because of it.
Does anyone know the nuts and bolts of this agreement?
All I'm seeing so far is sound bites and precious little detail.
And or people who don't do twitter?
An official source would be nice.