Forum menu
I'm rostered to work Christmas Eve, Boxing Day, and New Year's Eve / Day this year and accept it as bad luck and part of the job. Don't get anything extra for the days in question either.
But if you were part of a union that was trying to organise something extra for you would you support them ?
are you working boxing day?
Doubletime I could understand (or just take it as holiday and not work).
But why would anyone want 4days pay for one days work?
Who do they think they are? Union Leaders?
But why would anyone want 4days pay for one days work
A footballer ?
But why would anyone want 40 days pay for one days work
A banker?
A footballer ?
Do you think footballers turn up for match day then disapear until the next match? 🙄
Police/emergency services, nurses etc don't get a choice. They do it.
Sadly I wish they could get time in lieu if they worked Christmas day etc 🙁
Greedy buggers 😡
Police/emergency services, nurses etc don't get a choice. They do it.
Oh, that's ok then, we should just accept it.
Sadly I wish they could get time in lieu if they worked Christmas day etc
If they all joined their union and campaigned for such things, they could.
Do you think footballers turn up for match day then disapear until the next match?
No course I dont ! I love footy and know what hard work they must of put in a kids. But once they make it to professional you can only train for so long each day.
I cant see they can train for more than half a day (4 -5 hours) for 3 or 4 days a week. They will need say 1 or 2 rest day a week. And then maybe either 1 or 2 match days where most of their work is actually travelling to the game.
It's a classic example of unions wielding too much power.
Im not arguing for the bankers.
However, I think its poor to be making stupid demands like this and then holding the employer to ransom.
just stupid in my view.
If you all joined your trade union, so they had 100% membership, or even close to that, then everyone might be on treble time and a day in lieu for working on Boxing Day.
Of course these fantastic conditions for all would come at no extra cost. Anyway, I'm with Binners on this one. Why would you want to travel round on the underground when there's still gluttony to be had at home?
Flaperon - MemberI'm rostered to work Christmas Eve, Boxing Day, and New Year's Eve / Day this year and accept it as bad luck and part of the job. Don't get anything extra for the days in question either.
Just 'cos you are happy to be rodgered by your bosses doesn't mean everyone has to
Police/emergency services, nurses etc don't get a choice. They do it.Sadly I wish they could get time in lieu if they worked Christmas day etc
Guess what - they get time and 60% plus a day in lieu.
Of course these fantastic conditions for all would come at no extra cost
If they reduced all these peoples pay to say £100,000 that would go someway.
Peter Hendy, Commissioner: £332,276
Steve Allen, Managing Director, Finance: £268,982
Mike Brown, Managing Director, London Underground: £285,230
Howard Carter, General Counsel: £219,156
Leon Daniels, Managing Director, Surface Transport: £97,000
Michèle Dix, Managing Director, Planning: £147,766
Vernon Everitt, Managing Director, Group Marketing and Communications: £230,310
Sarah Atkins, Commercial Director, Tube Lines: £188,476
Ian Campbell, Chief Information Officer: £166,065
Howard Collins, Chief Operating Officer, London Underground: £202,281
Stephen Critchley, Chief Finance Officer: £179,488
Frank Douglas, Group Human Resources Director: £192,387
Robert Doyle, Head of Track and Signals, London Underground: £175,119
Gerald Duffy, Director of Employee Relations, London Underground: £174,067
Garrett Emmerson, Chief Operating Officer Streets, Surface Transport: £182,675
David Hendry, Finance Director, Surface Transport: £179,348
Philip Hufton, Asset Performance Director, London Underground: £284,626
Richard Parry, Strategy and Commercial Director, London Underground: £217,859
Ben Plowden, Director of Better Routes and Places, Surface Transport: £176,777
Peter Regan, Corporate Finance Director: £220,877
Geoff Virrels, Director of Projects, Tube Lines: £131,095
David Waboso, Director of Capital Programmes, London Underground: £203,592
Terry Morgan, Non-executive Chairman, Crossrail: £251, 632
Rob Holden, Chief Executive, Crossrail: £857, 134
David Allen, Finance Director, Crossrail: £268,842
Neil Farmer, IT Director, Crossrail: £169,567
Andy Mitchell, Programme Director, Crossrail: £326,981
If you reduced Peter Hendy, Commissioner for TFL £332,276 pay to £100,000 you would have £232,276. TFL has 4,064 staff you could give each of them a £60 pay increase. (including Peter)
Or if you reduced Rob Holden, Chief Executive, Crossrail: £857, 134 pay to 100,000 you could give them £186.30 pay rise.
Im sure if you added them all together you get like a grand pay rise for everyone.
But if you were part of a union that was trying to organise something extra for you would you support them
No, because I think they're taking the piss. I knew from the moment I got the job that public holidays are just another workday.
If they reduced all these peoples pay to say £100,000 that would go someway.
Would you include Bob Crow and his £133,138 annual package in that list ?
The bosses arent trying to roger them ffs.
they just want more than they are contracted for at the moment.
Those wages look like a piss take, may explain a lot about the unions stance.
agree with OP....
sod em. surely this kind of action accelerates the introduction of driverless trains (DLR works fine without a driver). if they weren't such a bunch of jumped up monkeys they'd be safer - long term - in their jobs.
it breeds resentment amongst joe public and they won't care if there is a driver earning 50k controlling their train or a computer system and a couple of bods in a ontrol room overseeing it. all they want to do is get to where they need to go reliably and on time.
and so what if you have to work boxing day. are they going to start demanding the same terms for other bank holidays?
bob crow.... hurry up and crow it... (see what i did there?)
What was the result last year then?
[url= http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/dec/13/tube-drivers-boxing-day-strike ]Dec 2010[/url]
agree with OP....sod em. surely this kind of action accelerates the introduction of driverless trains (DLR works fine without a driver). if they weren't such a bunch of jumped up monkeys they'd be safer - long term - in their jobs.
Disagree earning £25,000 in London is pointless you just end up giving it to your landlord.
If you earn £50,000 you can try and save for a deposit and buy a house.
£50,000 is one year is worth alot more than £25,000 for two years.
They'll be safer if they can get a mortgage going and then get another job when the the trains are automated.
If earning less is safer why dont cheif executives take pay cuts ? To make sure there business is safe ?
Would you include Bob Crow and his £133,138 annual package in that list ?
What exactly does Bob Crow do for that salary?
"50,000 is one year is worth alot more than £25,000 for two years
😯
Would you include Bob Crow and his £133,138 annual package in that list ?
yes but presumably his union member pay that not TFL.
"£50,000 in one year is worth alot more than £25,000 for two years
How do you disagree with that ?
1. Inflation
2. Savings Interest
3. Possible Mortgage deposit therefore avoiding rent.
4. Mortgage over payments therefore avoiding interest.
4. Other investment opportunities.
I agree with the boxing day sofa idea.
Shut the tubes, shut the shops as one of these much needed Austerity Measures, all stay home with your families and finish those turkeys.
This year i am working christmas eve, christmas day, boxing day, NYE and NYD and don't get anthing extra, the joys of having to feed and water the masses!
Disagree earning £25,000 in London is pointless you just end up giving it to your landlord.If you earn £50,000 you can try and save for a deposit and buy a house.
£50,000 is one year is worth alot more than £25,000 for two years.
They'll be safer if they can get a mortgage going and then get another job when the the trains are automated.
that's a pointless argument as they are already recieving 45k/yr. their pay isn't being cut. they want (what many people believe to be) a massive increase for their days work as opposed to getting (what many people would believe to be) an already good deal. why should they hold their bosses to ransom?
Tube drivers already earn £45,545 per year but their salaries are set to soar to a £52,000 per year basic wage by 2015.They are also being paid an extra £1,200 'Olympics bonus' for working the three weeks during the games next summer.
In addition, they get 43 days of holiday a year and a 35-hour working week.
i'd work for 45k/yr inc. 43 days where i don't have to work yet still recieve money and all that for 35hrs/week.
Mick Whelan, general secretary of the union, told the Evening Standard: 'Obviously working Boxing Day and other bank holidays means unsocial hours for our members.
fortunately for society the majority of those in service industries see this as part of the job. as do many of those that work in retail or the self employed (i.e. me).
£230K for Group Marketing - incredible?
Rob Holden, Chief Executive, Crossrail: £857,134
Sweet Jesus!!!!! WTF does he do to warrant that? is he the man that paves the London streets with gold when Bob Diamond is a bit busy
well seeing as inflation is just less than 5%.
45,545 * 1.05 = 47822
It should go up to £47,822 next year so £52,000 by 2015 does sound too out of place.
Its just everyone else pay is frozen so we are losing money.
why should they hold their bosses to ransom?
in a perfect world they should nt hold there bosses to ransom. But in a perfect world Rob Holden, Chief Executive, Crossrail would nt be paid £857,134.
In principle I agree it would be best if people didnt strike and there was some board that could award the correct level of pay to everyone. But this system does nt exist.
I dont understand why for so many people a tube driver earning £50,000 makes them more angry than Chief Executive earning £857,134.
If the pay at top ever became "fair" then we could start looking at whether tube drivers pay is "fair".
tube travellers should go on strike on Boxing day and use the bus so that the tube company ***** get no revenue to pay for their ridiculous wage demands.
Guess what - they get time and 60% plus a day in lieu.
No they don't at least I can guarantee you that Ambulance service staff don't get time plus 60% and a day in lieu. We get 7.5 hours time in lieu back for working Christmas Day or Boxing Day despite working a 12 hour shift.
This has been the same for at least the past 5 or 6 years.
What's the tube?
And how will this affect me?
Wisepranker - are you not on agenda for change rates? The day in lieu is one of your PH / Al days - the 7.5 hrs is the equivalent of the 60% but I am suprised you are taking it in time not pay. Never heard of that.
Just don't run the underground on Boxing day.
Then introduce driverless trains.
Sorted.
What exactly does Bob Crow do for that salary?
He's worth every ****ing penny of it and funnily enough, the London Underground workers don't seem to want to get rid of him do they? If I was a London Underground worker, I'd be delighted to have Bob Crowe fighting my ground for me because he'd be getting me a decent wage in London, where it's bloody expensive to live, he'd be sticking it to my employers every time they tried to shaft me...again! And lastly, he pisses off people like you hora. That's worth a few days in lieu in itself.
50k in london is still a decent wage. many jobs in town pay <20k/yr. now that is a crap wage.
And good on Crowe for getting them such good wages. They're not getting it out the goodness of TFL's heart.
Russell Crowe?
50k in london is still a decent wage.
Then you'll have no problem with the drivers earning a decent wage eh?
With DD here (he's sounding suspiciously like elfin), imagine if we got the same value for money from elected officials that the RMT members do.
I've got no sympathy for the drivers on this particular issue, but in general support their actions- too many people here (I'm guessing largely outside the m25) feel that since they're not in a position to obtain a pay rise that everybody else should suffer.
Blimey DD - and we wonder why this country is in a mess???
One of the worst things about using the tube is the message that "London Underground is running a good service on all lines." I'm sure the irony is unintentional but it really grates. Its a bit like the posters going on about TFL not having thick skins. For sure they have rights to be treated correctly by the rest of the public, but when a good service constitutes traveling in dirty trains in cramped conditions, I would like to think that TFL might put the passengers first. How about some posters saying, sorry this really in a very average service at best, but bear with us it might get better one day. For £230k the marketing director ought to be able to do something along those lines.
50k in london is still a decent wage
Yeah I'd agree with you now why isnt everyone else earning it.
Blimey DD - and we wonder why this country is in a mess???
I don't think this country is in a mess at all. If I did, I wouldn't live here.
EDIT: But then you go on some tirade about how TFL is treating its customers badly? I can't see the connection...but I have a feeling you'll explain it to me.
Looking at that list I reckon every single person on it could just about scrape by if you halved their wages . They still would be on a hell of a whack , for running an underground system that is essential for millions of people .
There is no competition , no real choice ( ok there are buses but they are dump) The roads are clogged up so people use the tube . If you sacked all that list the system would grind on per usual as it has for years .
As for the drivers , well , Until i read the list of pay rewards I thought 'robbing gits > You dont even need to steer' . Then I thought about and still think it is slightly high , but pitched to allow negotiation to double time and day off in leiu .
All the upper management will be in Davos or St Morritz , so you cant blame the drivers or their unions for wanting a nice slice of [s]taxpayers hard earned [/s] pie for themselves
DD - I'll be brief. Have no problem paying for a good service or for employees earning a lot for providing one, but....... 😉
You should write to TFL then. Maybe they need to pay their employees more. 😀
😉
The letter will be ready for when the day arrives that TFL provides me a good service. Until then....
OK pay peanuts and get monkeys is fair enough, but pay well and get monkeys doesn't quite have the same ring to it?!!?