Time to protest TV ...
 

[Closed] Time to protest TV Licence fee?

72 Posts
49 Users
0 Reactions
349 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

With Rolf now getting added to the list of undesirables that were paid by the bbc. Is it time that the British public stood up and stopped funding the criminal activities that have/are happening at the bbc?


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 6:00 pm
Posts: 26776
Full Member
 

No
Next


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 6:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

no, not really.


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 6:01 pm
 gogg
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Back under your bridge...


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 6:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

yes, I love shit programmes and advert breaks


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 6:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Never paid it. Never will.

Next.


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 6:11 pm
Posts: 7561
Free Member
 

I would happily pay the licence fee just to listen to 6Music.

Indeed, I would willingly sell my house and all it's contents to pay for the BBC


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 6:11 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

[i]sigh[/i]Player


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 6:14 pm
Posts: 10868
Full Member
 

You going to stop paying taxes because of Cyril Smith too?


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 6:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I stopped paying the licence fee about 10 years ago. Soon after strictly come dancing started.


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 6:23 pm
Posts: 23198
Full Member
 

With Rolf now getting added to the list of undesirables that were paid by the bbc

How long is this list now, has it reached double figures yet? How big a proportion is it of all the people who have worked and presented on the BBC over the 40 or so year time frame these cases relate to? How would that proportion compare to other professions?

Anyway, if you stop paying your license fee there'll be nothing for Jamie to watch on his 4K tv.


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 6:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Think of it this way. How would you feel if you had to pay a fee to Shell in order to have a car, even if you only bought your fuel at Texaco? It's due to 'the unique way it is funded' that the BBC is a law unto itself, producing brain dead programming and numbskull news without fear of being held to acoount.


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 6:28 pm
Posts: 4968
Free Member
 

Let me think about that. Best TV, best radio, best news website. NO!


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 6:30 pm
Posts: 4695
Full Member
 

It's due to 'the unique way it is funded' that the BBC is a law unto itself, producing brain dead programming and numbskull news without fear of being held to acoount.

That's right, because commercial TV is so good.


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 6:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm not arguing that commercial TV is any better but making the point that having a guaranteed income stream from the licence fee makes the BBC unaccountable.


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 6:36 pm
 Del
Posts: 8247
Full Member
 

No, it doesn't. In fact it's probably a lot more accountable than any commercial station, other than for the purposes of revenue.
Perhaps you'd like to can the NHS while you're looking at these things...


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 6:41 pm
Posts: 10868
Full Member
 

Can we all agree that one thing we really don't like is repeats? Like TV license arguments on STW for example...


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 6:44 pm
Posts: 11398
Full Member
 

Never paid the licence fee for obvious reasons but i'd be willing to cough up for a radio fee as i would go bat-shit crazy without 6music and R4 (and a few select R1 shows), tis' a shame the world service budget has been cut right back at the expense of funding utter trite daytime tv


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 6:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Best TV, best radio, best news website.

Really??
The only TV programme I like on BBC is Top Gear and we only get 12 episodes a year, if that. The rest is moronic drivil IMO. The only stuff we really watch is Game of Thrones, Walking Dead and 24. All of which are on commercial TV


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 7:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Worth it for 6 Music and BBC4 alone


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 7:12 pm
Posts: 1369
Free Member
 

Murdoch and co ran a full-scale espionage ring. Do you suggest we (or rather, those who take anything from Sky) 'stand up' and- what-?


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 7:16 pm
Posts: 1369
Free Member
 

@ woodlikesbeer- one of the great things about the Beeb is its public service. It helped me with things like spelling and punctuation.

Licence fee is worth it twice over I'd say- maybe its just too highbrow for you.


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 7:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[quote=woodlikesbeer said]Best TV, best radio, best news website.
Really??
The only TV programme I like on BBC is Top Gear and we only get 12 episodes a year, if that. The rest is moronic drivil IMO. The only stuff we really watch is Game of Thrones, Walking Dead and 24. All of which are on commercial TV

Shame you missed Happy Valley, it was frickin' ace 🙂


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 7:20 pm
Posts: 1924
Full Member
 

There are lots of really good quality programs on BBC radio and tv. Right enough if switch on on the off chance you will probably get drivel. I have Radio 4 on during the day at work and learn something new and interesting about the world every day.
Go for a hotel break to Italy (for example) and switch the tv on and see what happens to your viewing when market forces are the only driver for program making and selection.


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 7:27 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

One word: InbetweenersArgh, no-one will believe i was joking.


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 7:27 pm
Posts: 34133
Full Member
 

silly troll, is silly

you may as well say ban all aussies,


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 7:31 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

To easy not to pay the license fee.

Use the BBC but don't pay for it?
You're a parasite.

Bring in a thousand pound fine for evasion.
Enforce it.


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 7:32 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Presonally I think the BBC is worth several multiples of the license fee, if only for CBeebies. Thank the **** heavens for CBeebies.


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 7:33 pm
Posts: 5646
Full Member
 

The license fee just gets paid by DD. How much is it now BTW?

What would be the alternative? Let Murdoch advertise at us? I'm sure if he had an income stream as big as the BBC he'd commission quality educational programming too. Oh, wait........


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 7:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i dont pay a licence fee as i dont watch live tv.
i do very occasionally watch iplayer, though since they lost the moto gp and f1, much much less. i would be willing to chip in to use iplayer but i rate it about 1/3 as good as netflix which is half the price and 1/10 as good as 4od which is free so how much should i have to chip in?


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 8:05 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

All of it.

You use the BBC - Pay for it. 🙂


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 8:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[quote=jonah tonto said]i dont pay a licence fee as i dont watch live tv.
i do very occasionally watch iplayer, though since they lost the moto gp and f1, much much less. i would be willing to chip in to use iplayer but i rate it about 1/3 as good as netflix which is half the price and 1/10 as good as 4od which is free so how much should i have to chip in?

There isn't a partial licence fee option so if you're unwilling to pay the full wack then just make the small sacrifice to ditch the occasional iplayer watching and go 100% netflix / 4od.

Easy.


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 8:13 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Worth it for Cerys and Lauren


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 8:15 pm
Posts: 1924
Full Member
 

At least you guys are still forced to subsidise my opera, classical music concerts, art gallery, ballet and theatre habits even if you can save a few pence a day by watching world leading quality programs on a laptop. 😈


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 8:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

hold on. according to the people i would have to pay ie the bbc. i dont have to pay to use iplayer, so why the **** should i pay a whole fee or stop using it?


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 8:35 pm
Posts: 74
Free Member
 

Indeed, I would willingly sell my house and all it's contents to pay for the BBC

Brant, do you think the OP is old enough to get that reference 😀


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 8:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

With Rolf now getting added to the list of undesirables that were paid by the bbc. Is it time that the British public stood up and stopped funding the criminal activities that have/are happening at the bbc?

Yes of course you should. Also...if you have ever stroked a cat you should probably get tested for feline AIDS.


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 8:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[quote=jonah tonto said]hold on. according to the people i would have to pay ie the bbc. i dont have to pay to use iplayer, so why the **** should i pay a whole fee or stop using it?

If you only watch catchup TV then yes you're right, no licence fee required currently. But you seem a public spirited kinda guy so surely coughing up the £145/yr for the licence fee ain't no hardship given all the investment the beeb have made in making that technology platform and content available to you 🙂


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 8:42 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Its £145?!

Rip off. I dont pay it. Mrshora does as I refuse to.

How much does the BBC make from selling shows internationally, DVD etc etc sales?

No wonder it can pay million pound severence packages.


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 8:48 pm
Posts: 8
Free Member
 

I pay it. The BBC is the best broadcasting corp in my opinion and I refuse to knowingly give money to Rupe Murdoch.

I have noticed the BBC news to be more political these days, most probably fawning over the government when its charter is coming up for renew.

And, of course, Doctor Who rocks!


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 8:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i have paid the liscence in the past. for years and years.

seriously though, how come iplayer only holds content for 7 days? 4od et el hold stuff more or less indefinitely. the entire grand designs back catalogue is there for instance, but i cant watch series 1 of Luther (the last thing i watched before i stopped the tele and licence)

edit; im just picking holes in it now, ignore me. i have always just disliked the 'unique way its funded'


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 8:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

and another thing, how come you get more of a discount for watching in black and white than you do if you're blind? that has always struck me as weird


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 9:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 9:11 pm
Posts: 1369
Free Member
 

I'd like to see anyone on this thread who thinks the Beeb is poor value for money:
-take the remit given
-charge LESS than £145 per year
-and DELIVER THE SERVICES WITHOUT THE INTRUSION OF ADVERTS!

If you think you can do it, there's a DG post awaiting you.

Honestly <tsk>


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 9:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I don't watch any telly, or listen to any BBC radio. So stop paying it, why does it matter? Your life won't stop, listen to some other crap on the radio, and there is a stream of boring programs to watch...


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 9:21 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

The only way to appreciate the BBC is to see what the rest of the world delivers.
Non commercial TV means you can make programmes that everyone won't like, you can cater for minorities and you can deliver high quality stuff.
I can't remember when I last watered ITV when I was in the UK, on the occasions I watched Sky in hotels the amount of interruption was intolerable considering you already paid for the service.

BBC News continues to be one of the best news services in the world, with balance and perspective. It's just unfortunate that things need to be dumbed down for the short attention span bottom feeders out there.


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 12:29 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The only TV programme I like on BBC is Top Gear and we only get 12 episodes a year, if that. The rest is moronic drivil IMO. The only stuff we really watch is Game of Thrones, Walking Dead and 24.

All of the programmes you named are pure moronic drivel for brain dead morons. Not opinion, FACT.


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 1:20 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

as my sky subscription has just increased by 8% £145 a yer sound like good value..


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 2:01 am
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

Has the adverts gone up on sky by 8% too? Must be near to 50/50 content vs adverts - more if you include sky news


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 2:15 am
 JoeG
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I'm pretty sure that the TV tax was one of the reasons that us Americans declared our independence on July 4, 1776! 😉

Lots of fireworks went off this evening to celebrate. 😀


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 2:37 am
Posts: 7128
Free Member
 

I don't pay it because I haven't got a telly. I can't stand e.g. Top Gear. However if you live in Australia or America your brain is completely atrophied by commercial telly and radio and you would happily pay double the license fee. I used to stand and salute when I picked up the BBC World Service on my short wave radio.


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 4:41 am
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

JoeG good job its just fireworks. Put guns in your hands and it'd be carnage.


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 7:16 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

After Rolf was found guilty I demanded Glens, Hutcheson, Robertson and/or Stepek come round and uplift my telly. I simply refuse to fund such filth.


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 7:25 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I never watch BBC.

Until the World Cup footy.

Rather have a choice of subscribing than
watching crap like Eastenders.


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 7:41 am
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

Rather have a choice of subscribing than
watching crap like Eastenders.

Other high quality programming available...


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 7:53 am
 Drac
Posts: 50477
 

I'd rather they didn't show football and left that to dedicated channels. But they do so I watch something or do something else.


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 7:58 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Lived overseas for a few years without access to BBC. There were two things I missed badly while away - pubs and the BBC. Best value money I spend all year and always have a small smile to myself when I pay it. I can't envisage many people opting to ditch it if they have had a decent exposure to not having it (and that's from someone who maybe watches an hour of TV a week). As people have said - Radio 4, 6 Music, BBC4, Glastonbury coverage last weekend, etc. etc. etc. Happy to subsidise Casualty etc. in return for having alternative to commercial pap.


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 8:09 am
 ps44
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

But if it's as good as the enthusiasts here claim, it will have no problem funding itself via a subscription model.


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 8:20 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Watching a documentary on commercial TV is often frustrating

0 - 3 minutes: they'll preview what they're going to show you.
3 - 10 minutes: they'll show some content
10 - 11 minutes: they'll tell you what they'll show you after the break
11 - 16 Ad break
16 - 18 minutes: summary of what you've just seen followed by a preview of what's to come.

Etc. etc.

In a 1 hour slot, you'd be lucky to see 20 minutes of content


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 8:33 am
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

ps44 - Member
But if it's as good as the enthusiasts here claim, it will have no problem funding itself via a subscription model.

Smacks head against wall....
The reason it works it that it does not need to conform to the pressures of commercial TV where play it safe shows make it (whats that another Ant & Dec reality show or singing talent show) If you want more of the same controlled by advertisers and some fairly opinionated proprietors (linked very closely to that recent phone hacking convictions) who use their media to influence the public to agree with them then got for the sub model.

Failing that a national impartial broadcaster that provides high quality output that is revered the world over funded via taxation is my preferred route. In the end scrap the TV license and add it to income tax.


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 8:34 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The only TV programme I like on BBC is Top Gear and we only get 12 episodes a year, if that. The rest is moronic drivil IMO. The only stuff we really watch is Game of Thrones, Walking Dead and 24. All of which are on commercial TV

Really?
Oh dear.............


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 8:45 am
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

jonah tonto - Member

hold on. according to the people i would have to pay ie the bbc. i dont have to pay to use iplayer, so why the **** should i pay a whole fee or stop using it?

Legally, you're fine.

Morally, you're a thieving parasite.
HTH.


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 9:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Morally, you're a thieving parasite.

i think that is a bit harsh tbh

especially since i was saying i would like to be able to pay as and when i use iplayer!
FYI i just checked my history and haven't used it in the last three months at all since there was nothing on i wanted to watch. i have however re-watched Luther on the box set i had to buy even though i had a licence when this series was made so i have, in effect had to pay for it twice.
oh.....and then there is the £597.3 million that came out of general taxation .....


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 10:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

jambourgie - Member
Never paid it. Never will.
yip


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 11:12 am
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

jonah tonto - Member

i think that is a bit harsh tbh

Fair enough, just my opinion.

i have however re-watched Luther on the box set i had to buy even though i had a licence when this series was made so i have, in effect had to pay for it twice.

No, you haven't.
You chose to buy the box set, nobody made you buy it.

The license fee enabled you to watch it when it was broadcast.
You bought the box set so you could watch it again, when you wanted to.

Justify it however you want. 🙂


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 11:39 am
Posts: 33607
Full Member
 

Rather have a choice of subscribing than
watching crap like Eastenders.

Is there someone in the room threatening to hit you if you don't watch it?
Thought not.
How many excellent programmes made for US TV have been canned because they didn't get the viewing figures to satisfy the station advertisers?
Commercial interests win over quality programmes every time.


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 12:14 pm
Posts: 407
Free Member
 

Watching ITV's effort of broadcasting Le Tour at the moment and the number of breaks for adverts I would gladly pay a fee to ITV if they stopped showing adverts!


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 12:32 pm
Posts: 46
Free Member
 

Yeah, everyone should stop paying for a TV licence. Why fund a paedophile ring disguised as a broadcasting corporation?


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 6:11 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I think the BBC is one of the things this country should be proud of.
I would pay double .
6music
Radio 4
BBC 4
5 live
Radio 1
Test match bloody special!


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 8:27 pm
Posts: 20681
Free Member
 

I have never even thought about it. I am sure there are more worthy things to wet my pants over .


 
Posted : 06/07/2014 12:09 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

Yeah, it's alright. You know, apart from the massively tory aligned agenda, active participation in obtuse blanketing of the public opposition to privatisation of the NHS, promotion of extremist political parties with nefarious agendas and tacit acknowledgement with no condemnation of a series of vile and corrupt high profile individuals.

Apart from that it's brilliant.


 
Posted : 06/07/2014 12:31 am
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

You know, apart from the massively tory aligned agenda

Where as a bunch of people reckon it's full of lefties...


 
Posted : 06/07/2014 12:32 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

The biggest trick the bbc ever pulled was convincing people they were full of lefties. 😉


 
Posted : 06/07/2014 11:14 am