I wonder why this film is banned?
Who banned it?
[img] 
[/img]
binners - Member
Whats become clear over the last week is that the royal family do actually perform an essential public service.They give the terminally bewlidered, and hopelessly naive simpletons something to coo over. And temporarily distract the Daily Mail reading classes from spittle-flecked rants about illegal immigrant lesbian single mothers on benefits.
^^this!
I had to deal with my mum telling me about the royal baby names last night, I kept pretending I didnt know what baby she was talking about but it didnt stop her
Who banned it?
THEM who do you think
Film classification folk I assume
But...I heard on the news that someone heard on the news it was a black baby?
They give the terminally bewlidered, and hopelessly naive simpletons something to coo over.
Luckily more enlightened punters on a mtb forum simply ignore the media circus and refuse to even comment on this piece of overblown non-news.
I would say calling a baby a **** is pretty uncalled for.
I doubt the baby cares about random comments posted on a mountain bike forum,it is just you wanting to be a precious little darling about it.
ernie_lynch
George is a beautiful British name. A proper royal name too.
Wikipedia
In Germany, the name has been popular since the Middle Ages, declining later use. In Britain, despite being St. George the patron of England since the fourteenth century, the name did not become popular until the eighteenth century following the accession of George I of Great Britain.
George 1st, the German king of England.
Not sure about Louis though. Who thought of that ffs ?
George 1st's middle name was Louis (Well, he was Georg Ludwig to start off) and this chap might have something to do with it....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Mountbatten,_1st_Earl_Mountbatten_of_Burma
"Mountbatten" ???
That sounds well foreign to me. Not surprised he was called Louis.
George on the other hand, is a Beautiful British Name.
Nice to have Kaesea back though.
Like all good conspiracy theories, I don't think this is actually true. I can see a bunch of stuff relating to their site access and their profiles are different enough for me to believe they're two distinct people.
Theoretically it's possible that they are the same person and Kaesae has been very clever about it, but, well, I'll leave calculating the likelyhood of him being clever about something as an exercise for the reader.
I don't know why but the name mountbatten makes me think of battenberg... might have nip to the co-op for some now with a nice cup of tea.
carry on btw 🙂
I don't know why the constant comparisons with Kaesae. Kaesae started highly popular threads and provoked challenging debates, however [i]unusual[/i] some of his views were. He was clearly a different person. And yes Cougar, I think there was a reasonable possibility that Kaesae could be [i] clever about something[/i], but well done for including a little dig at him, despite the fact that he can't defend himself. Still, Kaesae was constantly bullied and ridiculed on here, so at least your comment is in keeping with that spirit.
Film classification folk I assume
That's not what the article says. Censors aren't lawyers. More likely is that the lawyers acting for the producers said that certain sections bore a high risk under English defamation law and should be removed to stop everyone getting the bollocks sued off. Same as Kurt and Courtney, Biggie and Tupac etc.
I would say calling a baby a **** is pretty uncalled for.
TBH though I think Charles should have encouraged his sons to be gay, so that at least he was actually as ecofriendly as he makes out to be.
I was bored...
[URL= http://i551.photobucket.com/albums/ii450/LeeWilliams1976/yeehaw_zps07e52ade.jp g" target="_blank">
http://i551.photobucket.com/albums/ii450/LeeWilliams1976/yeehaw_zps07e52ade.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]
I'm going to send the design to the Frampton mint and see if they want to print them. I reckon I should make a fortune.
I think this is lovely.
[img] 
?351[/img]
Specially as Prince William has such an impressive head of hair.
I presume the newspapers doing the gushing are the ones who criticise North Korea for their ridiculous outpourings over their unelected rulers.
(courtesy Mark Steele)
All hail the grand and glorious * family and their contributions to the military might of our great nation.
Why was it they changed the family name in 1917 again? *s 😆
Orf with his head and feed the corgis on his entrails!!
is there an audio version?There is. Read by Brian Blessed.
I prefer the version read by Joe Pasquali.
I think this is lovely.
If they do a tea towel version then I'll buy one. You can always judge a person's nature by the tea towels they own.
