Imagine, if you will, a person (of the variety to which you are normally sexually attracted) with no head.
Now imagine such a person (with their head, but) with no arms or legs.
Which is more attractive? 😀
(Assume in each case that there is nothing traumatic about the loss, just that they happen to be formed like that. Person with no head can think and move around and so on, but not speak, person with no limbs probably travels on some sort of floating saucer, like the Mekon.)
Or indeed, suggest other body parts that your ideal partner could do without while still appealling to your twisted sense of what's hot.
?
I think I am going to join Brant too...........
are you on crack?
are you on crack?
Probably not but it IS friday afternoon!
Oh go then...
it's because I thought the diver on the A&A thread had no head...
[img] 
[/img]
What do you mean "no head"? I can definitely see his cheeks!
1) depends how tight the body is
2) depends how deep the throat is, must be at least 5.25" 😆
3) T*ts, overrated
I'm going to go with....No head.
feet aren't that attractive, I could see myself not really missing those much...
Sometimes, I really worry...
This concept is difficult without pictures.
[img] 
[/img]
In searching for some, I came across the view that "[url= http://www.theinsider.com/news/88698_HOSTEL_2_IS_CONFUSING ]Jacking off to a girl with no head has to be illegal.[/url]" I can't find any confirmation that that is correct, but it seems possible. 🙂
would the lack of head mean they couldn't speak to me? its an important consideration.
No body.
But only if I can get a go on her flying saucer.
how does having your buttocks bare, make you go faster in the water?
As far as the original question, I think I'd rather have someone with a head.
This is along the same lines as the question 'If you could pick a woman with a fishes head or a fish with a woman's head, which would you prefer?'
My mother-in-law is an attractive lady but... no head please! The world would be quieter and more peaceful 🙂
Do you mean like this, because it can be an improvement?
[img] 
[/img]
In Irvine Welsh's short story "Fortune's Always Hiding", the protagonist, Dave, keeps a melon with three holes in it in the fridge, with which he pleasures himself. When he meets Samantha, a woman born without arms as a result of her mother using thalidomide, she says something fairly coarse during sex which makes Dave wonder whether she has found his fridge melon.
From the collection Ecstasy: Three Tales of Chemical Romance... Not terribly good I don't think.
My mother-in-law is an attractive lady but... no head please!
I'm surprised you even have to specify no head from the mother-in-law! !
Fingerless BJ.
I rest my case!
;o)
See, the no head thing would be fine. Although, I am tempted by the Meekon flying saucer...wheeeeeeee
Oh god, what has my picture started!
If no head means they can't chat for ages and you don't have to take them out for a drink or a posh meal then I think you have found a winner.
I suggest you read 'killing for company' - you'll probably find it a hoot!
maybe with no head they just communicate by brain waves and can read your mind and then they'd able to tell you were thinking, 'what would I rather have, a dog that wees beer, or a hovercar?'
And bin you off.
[img] 
[/img]
This man seems disappointed with his choice.
what about sexy bodies with other people's heads?
[url=
- not safe for work until 3:50, and arguably not particularly safe after that.[/url]
[img] 
[/img]
This seems lacking.
BD, does it? Bundles of fun and no complains if you put the Ashes on at the same time 😀
Nedrapier, that video is funny, in that you sort of get used to the ladies with Aphex Twin's face, so after a few minutes they have to shock you even more by using Charlie Dimmock's.
[img] 
[/img]
I think i would definitely rather have a hovercar, if you were caught drinking your dog's wee then you would have some serious explaining to do.
just reminded myself of the main vid. NSFW! unless you're working from home, have a handy desk position, or work in some cutting edge meedja place.
[i] using Charlie Dimmock's[/i]
Ha!
[img] 
[/img]
Not, admittedly, particularly sexy.
Love the pic BD. Early photoshop, possibly!?
The retention of a chainset below the man who is just a torso seems unnecessarily cruel...
Folks, this has been excellent.
As we know, it is vital to a healthy sex life that you share your fantasies with your partner. Go home this evening and tell your special lady that she'd still be sexy without a head. More fun than calling her the wrong name. 🙂
I think BigDummy's the winner here. No doubt about it.
I never thought of that permutation ever before in my life, but I have a feeling it's all I'll be thinking about this lonely weekend....
It will, as they say, run and run.
I cant believe no-one's mentioned "Boxing Helena" yet 🙂
[img] 
[/img]
Stoner, I remember that came out when I was at school, and was the subject of much discussion in the playground, mostly along the lines of "What happens when she needs to use the toilet?" 🙂