Forum menu
why do people say something controversial and then say FACT at the end of it ?
Surely capitalism is a non zero sum game and we can all be winners ....have they been lying to us all along ?
Oh it could be fun to stay her and use the right wingers arguments against them
Anyway more importatnly
Bravisimo DD for binners
Sigh..........
(point to self, avoid political/economic debates on STW - unless you enjoy getting giddy!!)
I almost came back on global warming one after recent IPCC report indicating major tone down on impact of human activity, but then again, what's the point? Better to get on our bikes and ride!!
I'm in the private sector, collect & pay VAT, collect and Pay Tax & NI, have silently fumed as my pension has been decimated, watched wages in the Public Sector soar way above anything I or any other similar one man private sector tax generator will receive for our efforts.
I'm thinking we in the private sector should organise ourselves, I'm thinking enough is enough, I'm wondering what would happen if we did all get together then had a Tax Strike, refused to pay the VAT, they couldn't jail all of us could they? What are they going to pay the prison guards with? How would the politicians continue to get paid, then if we also refused our council tax?
Maybe someone might start listening to us, I mean, not much to ask is it? We do generate the cash after all.
The unions can only protect their own members at the expence of other people, FACT.
why do people say something controversial and then say FACT at the end of it ?
Do you mean the above? There is nothing controversial there. It is a fact. Who do you think pays the bills for the public sector? It's everyone else. FACT. 🙂
(Isn't 30 November a public holiday in Scotland anyway ??)
I guess I will be Striking from Home that day.
I'm thinking we in the private sector should organise ourselves, I'm thinking enough is enough, I'm wondering what would happen if we did all get together then had a Tax Strike, refused to pay the VAT, they couldn't jail all of us could they? What are they going to pay the prison guards with? How would the politicians continue to get paid, then if we also refused our council tax?
Well do it then.
You can just walk away from this thread (you too, TJ) - they'll all get bored and stop arguing if there's nobody to argue with.
Yeah; it would be nice to let some of the Little Hitters have a bash for a change. Most of them aren't very good at proper arguing, and often make themselves look a bit silly. Could be fun. 🙂
Just one little tickle though:
Who do you think pays the bills for the public sector? It's everyone else. FACT.
And who d'you think pays for all the goods, services and products the private sector produces, keeping them in business? Hmm?
😉
Kettle's on. Who's having what?
Teamhurtmore - link for IPCC please 😛
Come on very slow day at work ...indulge me 😉
That's Capitalism, baby.. Oh what you don't like it that corporations can just lay thousands of workers off cos labour's cheaper in the East? That they will act according to what gives them the most profit, not what's in the best interests of their workers? Diddums. Well you can always complain to your union, can't you? Oh....
Doesn't bother me in the slightest, it's survival of the fittest in the real world (private sector). If I'm lazy or do a poor job, I don't get to keep my job. In the public sector if you do a shit job you get promoted or moved sideways it seems.
Just to give you some background on how my opinion has been formed... I used to work with various county councils, the vast majority of people I came across would be unemployable in the private sector, anyone loosing their job is in for a real shock. As an example of the crap I came across on a regular basis the 'construction division' of a local council that I worked with had the number of employees you would expect to see in a £90m turnover construction company. They turned over about £15m a year and lots of external contractors were used because the construction division couldn't cope.
The construction division when tendering for a job would quote 20 weeks, then end up taking 26 weeks to complete a job. The external contractor would quote 10 weeks for the same job and actually complete on time. The construction division was also a liability and once covered 20 school kids in asbestos dust becuase they were so incompetent.
All of that is by the by, at the end of the day the country can't afford the public sector as it is, so something needs to change.
No really JY - you don't want to!! If I am really bored later, I might resurrect the thread. It was all about how both sides mis-quote the evidence agin this week, as is usual in most of these debates!! Hence wrote post last night, thought better of it, and deleted it. Life's too short!!
We should be supporting our public sector staff. Sure, there a minority who sit in back offices waiting to collect their pensions. However, there's a vast number who work for the likes of the NHS who need our support. Unlike the private sector, their pay isn't great - however the people who go into it, mainly do so for the pension.
If the government continue to cut their pensions, and on-call systems the staff will simply move out of the public sector. Probably into the private sector, and abroad.
If we lose our NHS as public service, quite frankly we'll be fu*ked. If you have any minor, ongoing condition, you're going to be paying through the nose for insurance. Sports like mountain biking will be HEAVILY charged by private medical insurance.
Support our NHS and our nurses/doctors.
gsp1984 - that may all be true but it doesn't mean that people who've worked for 40+ years to one pension contract shouldn't have another imposed on them - whether they work int he public or private sector?
public sector inefficiency and employee pension rights aren't the same thing and don't need to be linked.
I think there is a feeling that it is the public sectors turn for some pain.
more or less sums it up for me, i know a few public sector employees and they don't exactly have a hard life, however it's the sharp end that really suffers (nurses etc), it's the bloated middle management and administrators that are a waste.
all they seem to do is fire off pointless emails to try and justify their jobs.
Makes chicken noises in your general direction - kidding in general- you are correct some "debate" [ they are not actually debates are they] are just a bit pointless
Having just worked 30 hrs straight some of us in public sector work hard.
I won't be striking though support anyone who does.
It's the lack of accountability that really gets me, if a private sector director invested 50 million and lost it, he'd be gone instead of still sitting there laying off front line services whilst retaining his/her £250k pa salary for running a county council.
that may all be true but it doesn't mean that people who've worked for 40+ years to one pension contract shouldn't have another imposed on them - whether they work int he public or private sector?
There is no suggestion that accrued benefits will be lost so people in this position will see little change in their entitlement.
it's the bloated middle management and administrators that are a waste.
Probably a lot of truth in that. However the thing I've never worked out is how does one determine what is an appropriate amount of middle management and administrative staff?. The Police seem to get lambasted for this on a fairly regular cycle. Either they get a bollocking because too many police officers are wasting time doing administration rather out on the streets fighting crime, or they get a bollocking because they are spending too much money employing back-room admin staff when they could be spending the money on Police officers.
In the same way that there's [i]good[/i] AIDS, and [i]bad[/i] AIDS, (see Brass Eye) could we not do the same with the public sector
We could send in someone no-nonsense and common sense (William Hague? Richard Littlejohn? Kelvin Mackenzie?) who will walk around all public sector building slapping big red crosses or big green ticks on people. Then we, the general public, can distinguish who we should support.
So poor Michelle, the hassled A&E nurse gets a big tick, but fat dereck who works in the planning department, you know the one, with his soup-stained tie, and his halitosis, he's had it. Get your coat fatty.....
And don't get me started on Colin in Marketing, with his four hour lunches and his taxi's everywhere on expenses. Pah. He can **** right off
JY -it will take more than that!!!
Hint, check out Christopher Booker in weekend Telegraph, then how BBC reports the news on latest report generally (major jump in assumptions/links between two opening paras) and then how Richard Black reports it. And we accuse people of selective editing on here at times - it made me smile though!!
Anyway - just in from a ride, so time to clean up. Good luck with the debate here - is it taking place in a fantasy Swindon by any chance?
It's the lack of accountability that really gets me, if a private sector director invested 50 million and lost it, he'd be gone instead of still sitting there laying off front line services whilst retaining his/her £250k pa salary for running a county council.
50 million?
Chicken feed.
[url] http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-11-08/news/30372320_1_tsuyoshi-kikukawa-olympus-internal-auditor [/url]
I like the idea Binners, Instead of ticks we could we have Livestrong style wristbands. Maybe blue for workers and red for shirkers (I'm planning on selling the idea to a Tory think-tank). Obviously if you had a blue band you'll be allowed to sell it to a shirker on ebay, then the market could find the true natural worth of a worker. It's genius.
Probably requires a bit of administration, but I'm sure Capita will be able to handle it in their normal competent manner.
TandemJeremy - Memberi'm just not convinced you have the general public's backing on this.
Probably don't because of the relentless propaganda from the right wing press for years that has led to a totally false impression of what is going on.
Oh here we go again, we're supposed to believe we'd all be socialists if it wasnt for that right-wing press infecting our impressionable little minds with their evil free-market ideology.
I thought we were all going to try and get along?
aaaaggggffffmmmmpppuummmpphhh
*muffled noise from edinburgh*
Working in the public sector
Job - check
Pension - check
Sick time - check
Good holiday - check
Right to whinge - check
Sympathy from everyone else?
I'm thinking we in the private sector should organise ourselves
Join a union?
Don't get us all to join a union FFS! Sweet Jesus! Haven't we been through enough over the last couple of years?!!! If we join a union, then they'll really start picking on us! 🙄
Sorry Binners, stupid mistake.
Join a Livery?
Probably don't because of the relentless propaganda from the right wing press for years that has led to a totally false impression of what is going on.
So you're able to filter this out but the public at large aren't?
Not sure whether that makes you super intelligent & the general public super thick or the other way around
If only everyone could see though TJs eyes, how sweet would the world be then?
I hope the strike doesn't delay the Snow Leopard I'm hiring, I think it's all run by a public sector org.
Saw the ad on Dave, £3/month and you can have a Snow Leopard - bargin
Hang on Jota, TJ will be back in a second to apologise, I heard the new TJ isnt going to be condescending us anymore.
Race to the bottom is a nice phrase used by the union and union members to describe their pension situation. No getting away from the simple maths though. Live longer = Contribute more OR for longer to your pension.
SIMPLE
Oh here we go again, we're supposed to believe we'd all be socialists if it wasnt for that right-wing press infecting our impressionable little minds with their evil free-market ideology.I thought we were all going to try and get along
Perhaps you could start by not parodying/distorting what someone said ?
Are you claiming our press is neither mainly right wing nor not capable of influencing the publics perceptions?
Why not address the claims rather than make a totally false representation of what he said?
He did not compare it to brainwashing nor did he suggest it would lead to a socialist utopia
Perhaps you should look at your own behaviour there as well
What he said was far more reasonable that what you said and what you seem to claim he meant
aaaaggggffffmmmmpppuummmpphhh
*muffled noise from edinburgh*
djglover - MemberRace to the bottom is a nice phrase used by the union and union members to describe their pension situation. No getting away from the simple maths though. Live longer = Contribute more OR for longer to your pension.
SIMPLE
and the NHS and teachers schemes have already done this and limited the taxpayer contributions.
Yeh Ok whatever son. If you're going to carry condescending the rest of us don't go whining when you get flamed.
TJ - that's "aaghmuuurphhphphphllgmph", surely?
People read the Daily Express? Blimey! You live and learn
mcboo - Member
Yeh Ok whatever [b]son[/b]. If you're going to carry [b]condescending[/b] the rest of us don't go whining when you get flamed.
😆
Binners - no one needs to read teh express or mail - this sort of thing does just as well- a mail headline generator
[url= http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/toys/dailymail/ ]IS THE BBC MAKING YOUR PENSION IMPOTENT?[/url]
Are there any 'Medium-Sized Hitters'?
😕
I think we should be told....
ARE FERAL CHILDREN MAKING BRITAIN'S SWANS OBESE?
Quality! 😆
All QTWTAIN. John Rentoul at the Indy blogs is clearing out the use of cliche and slapping the Mail. Is very good.
This is great too:
[url= http://www.fridgemagnet.org.uk/toys/dave-met.php ]"Last week, I met a white working-class postman, who told me that the unions went to Eton."[/url]
Can someone take some Smints round to TJ to sort out his constipation so he can join in properly.
