Drac, they've been bailed.
So not sentenced yet.
when people can run down cyclists and get off with a 6 month ban and a few hundred quid fine, whats the odds that this lot get a harsher punishment.
That's not the argument here.
group of asshats with low IQs assault man who was just doing his job
See?
Nope, they have had bikes confiscated though.
+1 on junkyards list,
Propose/encourage/arrange/ride legal mass participation events - see if your local council can be persuaded to encourage cycling and invest in local facilities or things like adult cycling proficiency to improve participation and hence the cycling lobby
Hold politicians (local and national) to account
Help your local planning office - writing in, responding to public consultations, (legally) protesting poor decisions
Report bad/dangerous driving (to the police not the forum!) and then hold the police to account - follow up, pursue, FOIA etc, community policing priorities can be shaped by enough people complaining
All of the above can be dull/time consuming but little wins stack up.
so some dicks kicked off at a peaceful protest, that sucks. hope all the CM haters are enjoying their moment of smug self satisfaction, but lets face it most of you had your minds made up before you knew any of the details.
Another case of cyclists hating other cyclists, good show chaps.
(edit) iirc CM was intentionally kept none organisational with no register or hierarchy so they wouldn't get shut down. pretty sure some citys tried to come down pretty hard on any CM shenanigans even if 100% peaceful.
I don't hate cyclists, I dislike people assaulting others and that's what I seen on that video. Sadly as you've just demonstrated there are those that just see these people as cyclists. That's the point, a few have spoilt it for CM and cyclists.
I don't hate cyclists, I dislike people assaulting others and that's what I seen on that video. Sadly as you've just demonstrated there are those that just see these people as cyclists. That's the point, a few have spoilt it for CM and cyclists.
^^This^^
Well they were all on bikes at a cycle rally so I would imagine they are actually cyclists....we cannot all be well educated, middle class and middle aged.
Another case of cyclists hating other cyclists, good show chaps
Depends what they are doing. I like their aims but think their methods are counter productive and unlikely to produce any benefit for cyclists.
I rather fear they make things worse for us tbh as peole see us a s law breakers ..just like RLJ
I agree they should use it as an opportunity to track stand but we are not all that awesome
D0NK - Member
so some dicks kicked off at a peaceful protest, that sucks. hope all the CM haters are enjoying their moment of smug self satisfaction, but lets face it most of you had your minds made up before you knew any of the details. Another case of cyclists hating other cyclists, good show chaps.
So Donk, who exactly is demonstrating a mind-made-up attitude here? I agree with Drac and others and feel that you "appear" more guilty-as-charged than the rest of us. "CM-haters", wow, where does that come from?
FWIW, I read this thread and opened the video links with an open mind. Not sure if anyone comes out with much credit but certain CM members (?) have done little to win my support, for sure. The absurdity of the "disabled" man's behaviour is pretty obvious and disappointing that the crowd chose to either inflame or film what was happening rather than try to calm things down. Have no idea what lead to the attempted arrest in the first place.
In contrast, other cyclists chose yesterday to show their peaceful support for cycling by lining the route of the road race, behaving themselves and interacting sensibly and politely with police, marshals and motorists.
Which body of people did more to contribute to a better world for cyclists in future?
[edit for X-post with JY: education, class and age should not determine behaviour. Each is irrelevant to this debate IMO]
"We can't all be well educated, middle class and middle aged"
What a ridiculous thing to say. Probably one of the most stupid things I've ever read on here. Well almost 😉
Christ all mighty on a bike does every post need an emoticon on here 🙄
Could it have been a sarccy comment 😯
I am only two out of the three, one of this is debatable but sadly I am certainly middle aged 😉
Clear 😕
THM [ a brief semi serious point] you may wish to study the statistics on crime broken down by age, education and "class" or the demographics of prison population...naturally I blame Thatcher and the inequality of wealth and opportunity.
one of this is debatable
Debate closed. 🙂
Blasphemy as well JY - you're on a roll!! 😉 (adds emotcion to avoid ambiguity here! 😉 )
Edit for X-post. Go on JY, I am too lazy tonight, give me the answer not sure that is will "really" correct the previous error 😉 ! But opened-minded 😉 so happy to see!!
Second edit for the edit ! I am glad that you have identified the cause and without the emotcion!!
@ CPT bugger , it is just middle aged then 😳
oh and damned apparently
Just caught the vid. but without the sound. White folk with dreads 😳 I know it's a stereotype but this is STW land so there you go.
Police were very restrained but that may be because they were so outnumbered.Where was the police backup....all busy doing G4S job no doubt.Good job it wasn't a group of rioters or terrorists or it could have kicke doff big time.I imagine the scene when backup did turn up was a bit different. Looks like there were some hotheads there but plenty of folk trying to calm things down too including passers by.
Christ all mighty on a bike does every post need an emoticon on here 🙄
Could it have been a sarccy comment 😯
LOL.
Comments on the rroadcc article are pretty good, worth a read and show both sides with less arguing. Won't give you my views (I'm sure you don't care) but lets just say I won't be building a tall bike anytime soon.
If CM is NOT organised, why does it appear to have a press officer who joins websites just to try and misinform people?
I've been cycling for 25 years and I've just noticed that CM could also stand for cock monkeys.
I wasn't defending the actions of any of the CM people and some of them no doubt will be asshats and I wasn't identifying a particular hater, however on this site there is a worrying undercurrent of, hmm how can I put it without getting all emotive or melodramatic? No sorry intolerance will have to do. Any cyclist who is a little different is open for scorn or downright abuse. Someone got run over "he must have been riding wrong". Some cyclist recieved a kicking "well what did he do to deserve it?" and of course someone who rides a different bike/route/direction to you is worryingly wrong and open for scorn or abuse. Might be down to many STWers being motorists with a sideline in cycling, who knows.
and of course protesters are all scum 🙂
I'm not a CMer or protester just a cyclist worried that plenty of other cyclists on here seem to be a little too quick to damn other cyclists.
Can't we atleast try to show a little bit of solidarity
(and I'm not suggesting sticking up for the dicks who [b]do[/b] cause trouble)
Hard to be 100% sure quite what I saw on that video but a lone individual seemed to be being attacked by more than one other, surrounded by a shouting mob.
That video doesn't put cyclists in a good light tbh...
IME there are some people who think a policeman/woman is a legitimate target because they are 'authority' even if it's just a lone copper on his/her own being surrounded by an intimidating group.
Says more about individuals' issues with authority figures than their basic humanity...
Sadly in this video these people are on bikes, which is just bad PR for cyclists as a community.
I'm not a CMer or protester just a cyclist worried that plenty of other cyclists on here seem to be a little too quick to damn other cyclists.
AFAIK, no one here is damning cyclists. Far from it, those of us who are anti-CM are so because they* are damaging the cause of cycling. I don't count those idiots as cyclists, they're idiots, and I'll very happily damn an idiot like them.
* - They as in the small number of asshats who have hijacked what could/should be a very good movement to create a positive view that cycling is good for cities. Sadly, the rest of CM has, AFAIK, never really done enough, or even anything to stop this small minority of asshats from ruining things. Seems that these days, the majority of CMers just want to film it on their smartphones, twitter about it and upload it, along with suitable degrees of faux-outrage, on their blogs. CM should be a great thing for cycling. It isn't, though.
Idiots are idiots whether they ride bikes or not. I don't see someone else on a bike and immediately assume that they are incapable of gross stupidity.D0NK - Member
I'm not a CMer or protester just a cyclist worried that plenty of other cyclists on here seem to be a little too quick to damn other cyclists.
Amen druidh, Amen.
DONK I think there can be that attitude on here but I am not sure that this means we have to defend all cyclists.
Some of us are tools...if this place teaches you only one thing it is surely that
Any cyclist who is a little different is open for scorn or downright abuse.
As far as I can see from those videos - policeman arrests someone who assaults him, other people violently attack police officer and help her unlawfully escape from custody, because she's 'one of them' and he represents 'the man'.
Now, I don't think thats abusing someone for being 'a little different' - Its criticising behaviour that is downright bloody unacceptable.
If that happened on a friday night in a city centre, we would rightfully expect every one of them to be locked up, and I for one hope that the video evidence is used to track them down and punish them to the extent of the law.
Thats what a lot of people seemed to have missed.
Yep, some of the people at cm are idiots.
Most will be normal people.
so when they are all referred to as asshats, hipster knobbers, etc, it does come across as anti cyclist.
Edit.
And that video only shows two minutes out four hours.
There will be other stories.
so when they are all referred to as asshats, hipster knobbers, etc, it does come across as anti cyclist.
See above.
Also, when the rest of CM do enough to get rid of that stupid, pathetic minority that ruin the potential of the message, THEN they will have achieved one small victory.
As others said earlier (Self included), other CMs, such as Southampton (admittedly years ago!) and Leicester, are celebrations of cycling. They are positive, and done to encourage and enthuse others towards the concept of cycling.
CM in London has been hijacked by a stupid, idiotic minority who do not represent cyclists. I am a London cyclist, and the idiots referred to in this post, and by others in this thread, do nothing but damage to the promotion of cycling in the capital as far as I can see.
so when they are all referred to as asshats, hipster knobbers, etc, it does come across as anti cyclist.
Unlike the anti-car abuse because a driver can't also be a cyclist. 😕
I'll re-state "...I'm not suggesting sticking up for the dicks who do cause trouble" they should get all the abuse they are due.
a couple of people said other CMs were ok but london was full of rent-a-protester, the rest seemed to be damning [b]all[/b] of CM.CM in London has been hijacked by a stupid idiotic minority who do not represent cyclists
gonna be tricky, with no organisation who is going to tell the nobs to leave? Seems to be very open/inclusive. BTW my comment earlier about the intentional lack of organisation was just something I [i]think[/i] i read a long time ago, if anyone can elaborate please do.when the rest of CM do enough to get rid of that stupid, pathetic minority
with no organisation who is going to tell the nobs to leave?
The other participants.
At the rather larger Countryside Alliance march, some BNP asshats tried to make their opinions known. They were given a very, VERY clear message that their opinion was not in the slightest bit welcome. No injury, no harm, just force of opinion.
There you go DONK you just need folk with guns to explain to them to stop
Pretty sure your opinion of how they are organised is correct
Seems to me this CM tried to provke a reaction & those responsible are now whinging because they bit off a bit more than they can chew.
Personally I wholly concur with the earlier comments made by Charlie the Bikemonger in respect of the importance of the issues and the reasons why Critical Mass exist.
However, where I disagree is over the wisdom of the approach taken on Friday. The reason for this is that one of the major problems we are up against is being seen as a group to be an embuggerance to the rest of humanity. Behaving very publically in a way that reinforces the stereotype aids no one.
I fully understand and respect the frustration and anger that exists, but personally believe that portraying cycling positively, as a mainstream activity and one that brings us as a nation great credit was not enhanced by CM’s actions on Friday. There are and where plenty of ways of achieving similar levels of coverage without being seen to behave like loonies, on what was an incredibly important and sensitive day. Remember we are still a target and that evening was likely to be one of the highest possible risk periods.
More damage done to the reputation of cycling and cyclists rather than anything achieved on our behalf IMHO.
embuggerance
Quality!
Although, I'm a bit confused now - are they cockmonkeys or asshats?
Some interesting comments and points of view, however I'm wondering how many of those being very negative towards CM have ever been on a CM ride. Because some comments seem highly ignorant of the reality, and more like reactionary prejudice.
I agree that there are a minority of people who seek to use CM as a platform for their own issues, however CM is as inclusive as possible, so there will always be elements which others may not see eye to eye with. regarding accusations that CM riders are trouble makers; there is very rarely any trouble on CM rides, and even more rarely any arrests. From what I can gather online and from accounts from eyewitnesses, it appears that the ride was stopped by large numbers of police at Bow church, who then directed the riders into a side street where many of them were then arrested and detained. There had, up until that point, other than the incident on Blackfriars road, been no trouble at all. There have now been allegations of assault by police officers made, by several of those arrested and detained, and it does now sadly seem possible that police acted unlawfully in detaining people who had committed no crime and without sufficient evidence to prove they were likely to commit any crime. People were detained simply for riding their bikes along a public highway. Which is perfectly legal. The police cannot simply dictate where people can and cannot ride, on public roads, unless there are safety issues. Other road users were able to carry on without hindrance, so there can be no argument that the cyclists posed any threat to public order or safety. Of the 183 people arrested, only 3 have been charged with any offence, suggesting that the vast majority of arrests were unnecessary. This does seem to be yet another example of overzealous policing. Indeed, one person who wasn't even part of the group was arrested, simply for riding nearby. I understand that several lawyers were at the ride, and it's highly likely the Met police will now face legal action for their treatment of law-abiding citizens.
Politics aside; to those who condemn CM as 'not helping the cause of cycling', why not join in with the next CM ride, where you will then have an opportunity to express your own views, and be able to meet and share ideas with others? If you feel that CM could be improved, why not get involved and do your bit to enhance the image of cycling? As I mentioned earlier, many of those on CM rides are active in campaigning for better provision for cyclists, and would welcome positive input from others. We may well be diverse in terms of who we are and where we're from, but surely we all share a common goal?
CM may be imperfect, but it's an opportunity to stand up and be counted, which surely must be better than passively accepting a situation which is flawed and in need of change.
Some interesting comments and points of view, however I'm wondering how many of those being very negative towards CM have ever been on a CM ride. Because some comments seem highly ignorant of the reality, and more like reactionary prejudice.
Never been on a ride, but I was in London on Friday and saw plants of what was going on.
Looked to me like a load of people were just trying to cause as much inconvenience to anyone else who happened to be in the area trying to get on with their lives.
Red light jumping, stopping en masse in the middle of junctions etc.
Not a great impression to make.
I stand up to be counted every time I go out on my bike, every time I commute on it, every time I use it for exercise, every time I use it for transport.
I don't set off on a Friday night to deliberately get in other road users way to prove that I can.
CM is counter-productive because it annoys other road users and does us no favours at all.
Why not join in? Because I don't agree that pissing people off is a good way to protest.
Mike, most of people on stw haven't been on a normal ride in years, let alone a cm ride 😀
"We can't all be well educated, middle class and middle aged"
Oh well, one out of three... 🙁
It's interesting also that some of you find CM 'antagonistic', when that is not actually the intention. If a large group of cyclists blocks a junction as they travel through it, how is that different to other road vehicles doing the same? Surely many, many more people were inconvenienced in their daily lives by the Olympic road races this weekend, or by events like the London Marathon? CM is not a daily event, it's once a month, for a few hours, and only in a small part of London. Every single cyclist has as much right to be on those roads at any time, as anyone else. What about the numbers of motor vehicles moving very slowly at rush hour, holding up and inconveniencing cyclists, who could travel much more quickly if it weren't for cars lorries and vans blocking their way?
Sop, surely this is more a matter of subjective opinion than anything else? I also saw the ride go past where I was on Friday evening, and almost everyone around was saying how great it was to see so many cyclists together. There are many who think CM is great, which contradicts the opinions of those who are against it. Again, it comes down to subjective opinion.
If people are annoyed that CM hinders their progress, then surely they must also be annoyed at the myriad other problems they encounter on their journeys, such as roadworks, other traffic, buses etc. I live near a busy road artery, and regularly see huge traffic jams, without a cyclist in sight. Anyone who drives on the M25 will know that you can often be stuck in a jam for ages. Cyclists aren't the problem. If you feel inconvenienced that a large number of cyclists is blocking your progress, then why not seek an alternative route? How do you feel if you're stuck behind other traffic? Why not take up cycling yourself, maybe it would be a quicker and easier way to get around?
The majority of cyclists on CM rides endeavour to be polite and courteous to other road users as much as possible. They will always, for example, immediately give way to an emergency vehicle. Just because they don't all ride single-file so that motorists can whizz past, does not make them inconsiderate. Maybe it's the motorists who should accept that they are in fact causing much greater problems in an extremely congested city, and change their behaviour to show consideration for others?
why not join in with the next CM ride, where you will then have an opportunity to express your own views, and be able to meet and share ideas with others?
because it is now seen to be at best a campaign organisation, and at worst a protest organisation. it may not be, but that's how the public see it (now).
I don't go on a "friendly, monthly ride" to express my views, I go on rides to ride with like minded cyclists!
Using legal technicalities regarding what is and isn't allowed and what the police can and can't do, is not "just a ride". Pretty sure Police do have powers to temporarily halt traffic and people from accessing public rights of way.
Seems to me this CM tried to provke a reaction & those responsible are now whinging because they bit off a bit more than they can chew.
Can't disagree with that.
I really hope that the Metropolitan/City police do not refer this back to the court system to determine if future rides are a ride or a protest.
Other road users were able to carry on without hindrance, so there can be no argument that the cyclists posed any threat to public order or safety.
What about the people blocking cars who are half across the junction legally, so the rest of your protest can ride through a red light. Were those road users hindered in any way in your opinion, or are you just going to pitch in tomorrow with another claim of police brutality? Interesting that you can't even understand what bad publicity you generate for all of us when there are four pages of mostly negative comments on a cycling forum. You seem to be ignoring what is actually going on at the moment in London as well, or did you see that as a further way of provoking conflict in an already stretched transport system?
It's interesting also that some of you find CM 'antagonistic', when that is not actually the intention.
Whilst I know nothing about CM, the comments here would suggest that whilst this might not be their "intention", it would seem to be the net result. Perhaps you / they need to review the unintended consequences of your actions?
Not to take sides - as I say, I'd never heard of CM a week ago - but it should speak volumes that this anti-CM sentiment is coming from a cycling forum rather than, say, PistonHeads?
I don't disagree that there are other annoyances on the public highways. But I don't follow the logic that this somehow makes it acceptable, laudable even, to compound those annoyances. Motorists cause problems, sure, but "two wrongs" and all that.
Cyclists have as much right to be on the roads as any other transport. But I'm not sure what's to be gained by avoidably antagonising others.
Where did Crikey's post go?
I thought it was rather apt, and agreed with it.
Mike, stop calling people "ignorant", it does you no favours.
