Forum menu
Nirvana.
Wet Wet Wet
Stone Roses
beatles
Wrong..
Westlife.
beatles
This
edit: or queen
Or the "What band do a lot of people like but I just don't?" thread.
Beatles
Oasis. that is all.
Radiohead
Vengaboys
U2
Oasis - and you van tell Liam I said so.
Oasis, utter utter shite...
Arcticdan - MemberU2
Oooh, good call; I'm fed up of the revisionist history of them. At the time - probably very good. Now, overhyped nonsense.
Coldplay
Oasis - to be fair, one good album, then each one was slightly worse. Sorta like a Nightmare or Elm Street, Halloween, or Friday the 13th of the music world.
beatles or u2 (one of the worst bands to come out of the Netherlands)
Florence and her w@nk machine
Or the "What band do a lot of people like but I just don't?" thread.
No, the 'most hyped up way beyond their true musical worth and genuine talent' thread.
Beatles is a pretty good shout. People forget they were a semi-'manufactured' boy band doing commercial pop music to begin with. Then were 'influenced by (copied, basically) other bands and musicians of the time. If you actually analyse their work critically, they weren't as good as many artists throughout the period they were active for. Loads more talented, inventive and original stuff out there, the Beatles enjoyed success cos they were relatively 'safe' and undemanding. Not unlike many of today's pop stars really.
Yeah, they had some good stuff, granted, couple of good albums, but tbh there's loads of better stuff out there really. They were never really inventive or original; they helped popularise a lot of other music, but weren't 'pioneers' in any real sense. And some of John Lennon's stuff is absolutely dire; wishy washy hypocritical sentimental tosh. Goddam Hippy.. George Harrison did some interesting stuff with Indian music for a bit, worked with the likes of Ravi Shankhar, but again, a bit insipid really. And as for McCartney; ye Gods where to begin? ๐ฏ
Yeah, Beatles for me too I think.
Oh, and for individual artist; Madonna. Yeah she's bin a round a very very long time, but what has she ever done where you can stand back and truly say 'that's great'?
oasis,oasis,oasis.oasis
Oh, and for individual artist; Madonna. Yeah she's bin a round a very very long time, but what has she ever done where you can stand back and truly say 'that's great'?
But it's POPular music, it's not supposed to be great, just appealing to the money giving drones who are looking for someone to give them an identity.
What method are we using to rate, apart from personal opinion?
Beatles
Yeah we know that, Don, it's all 'pop' music of some sort really, in't it? No matter how seriously it takes itself.
I used Madonna cos she's always the 'most whatever' artist blah blah blah without ever having really produced anything genuinely outstanding.
What method are we using to rate, apart from personal opinion?
The [b]Elfinscale[/b] on the [b]Elfinometer[/b]; that tried and trusted barometer of what is good and what isn't.
There is no better evaluative mechanism.
MUSE
Beatles
coldplay +1
the smiths
There's a few!
The Beatles
Radiohead
Oasis
The Clash
The Rolling Stones
Pointless thread of course as music is quite possibly the most subjective thing in the world.
I'll go for Beatles, U2 and Coldplay. Seen Muse live and they were awesome, albeit some of their later stuff is a bit poo
Pink Floyd
Yeah we know that, Don, it's all 'pop' music of some sort really, in't it? No matter how seriously it takes itself.
Not really, no. There's Pop music where it's done simply for the money and I believe there are genuine artists out there who do it for the love of music and not popular acclaim.
Not all music is pop music, but all pop music is overrated if it's considered to be anything other than popular.
And I still hate elastic. ๐ฟ
Beatles...right place, right time but that is it...
i thought my suggestion for Beatles would be controversial but obviously not
Beatles; complete rip off of the Rutles imo
Another addition on mine:
Elbow "I'm a boring man, who sings sond like a child sitting in a pram"..yadda..whine....moan
Artic Monkeys "You look good, sitting on someone elses face.." yadda yadda"
The Doors I reckon are the most over-rated.
One of the most under-rated I think is the Kinks. Every time I hear one of their songs I am extremely impressed, and yet most people just think of 'you really got me'.
For me the hair metal stuff Bon Jovi that sort of thing. Nothing to say, tedious by the numbers dad rock. Awful
AC DC
There's Pop music where it's done simply for the money and I believe there are genuine artists out there who do it for the love of music and not popular acclaim.
So you're saying the VengaBoys [i]din't[/i] do it for the money, then? ๐ฏ
Plenty of people who 'do it for the love of music and not popular acclaim' are crap though. Which is why they never have much 'success'.
And I personally know some very talented musicians, who [i]only[/i] do it for the money.
And you can't accuse Timmy Mallet of ever believing his music would make him an incredibly wealthy world-renowned megastar....
One of the most under-rated I think is the Kinks
I agree and I prefer them way more than the Beatles - always thought Davis was a far better wordsmith than he ever got credit for. I bloody hate "You really got me" though ๐ฎ
hair metal
what is the genre of metal I appear to have missed it?
Ohhh another..
Status Quo "a boring song, dinky, dink, dinky dinky"
So you're saying the VengaBoys din't do it for the money, then?
Maybe, I'd be more definite if I knew who they were/are! ๐
And I personally know some very talented musicians, who only do it for the money.
Does that actually mean that one side of their music ability is commercially successful and allows them to indulge themselves in other areas? I'm quite sure that the majority of people mentioned above are talented and do it for the money, just not artists.
And you can't accuse Timmy Mallet of ever believing his music would make him an incredibly wealthy world-renowned megastar....
No, but with his talent he's not doing too badly for a wouldbe shelf stacker at Tesco, is he?
๐
