Forum menu
Most Over Rated Ban...
 

[Closed] Most Over Rated Band In History.

Posts: 17290
Full Member
Topic starter
 
[#3263651]

Nirvana.


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:10 pm
Posts: 4434
Free Member
 

Wet Wet Wet


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:11 pm
Posts: 2889
Full Member
 

Stone Roses


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:11 pm
Posts: 1014
Free Member
 

beatles


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:11 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Wrong..

Westlife.


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:11 pm
Posts: 349
Free Member
 

beatles

This

edit: or queen


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:12 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

Or the "What band do a lot of people like but I just don't?" thread.


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:13 pm
Posts: 23340
Full Member
 

Beatles


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:13 pm
 mmb
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oasis. that is all.


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:13 pm
Posts: 16
Free Member
 

Radiohead


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Vengaboys


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

U2


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:17 pm
Posts: 6853
Full Member
 

Oasis - and you van tell Liam I said so.


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:18 pm
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

Oasis, utter utter shite...


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:19 pm
Posts: 6125
Full Member
 

Arcticdan - Member

U2


Oooh, good call; I'm fed up of the revisionist history of them. At the time - probably very good. Now, overhyped nonsense.


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:23 pm
Posts: 10498
Free Member
 

Coldplay


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:24 pm
Posts: 5728
Full Member
 

Oasis - to be fair, one good album, then each one was slightly worse. Sorta like a Nightmare or Elm Street, Halloween, or Friday the 13th of the music world.


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:24 pm
 kilo
Posts: 6924
Free Member
 

beatles or u2 (one of the worst bands to come out of the Netherlands)


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Florence and her w@nk machine


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Never find 'em when you need them. Never up to the job as they always break. No longevity as they become brittle and break after time. Buy a box, lose a box, buy another box, lose another box.
COMPLETE WASTE OF F***ING SPACE!
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Or the "What band do a lot of people like but I just don't?" thread.

No, the 'most hyped up way beyond their true musical worth and genuine talent' thread.

Beatles is a pretty good shout. People forget they were a semi-'manufactured' boy band doing commercial pop music to begin with. Then were 'influenced by (copied, basically) other bands and musicians of the time. If you actually analyse their work critically, they weren't as good as many artists throughout the period they were active for. Loads more talented, inventive and original stuff out there, the Beatles enjoyed success cos they were relatively 'safe' and undemanding. Not unlike many of today's pop stars really.

Yeah, they had some good stuff, granted, couple of good albums, but tbh there's loads of better stuff out there really. They were never really inventive or original; they helped popularise a lot of other music, but weren't 'pioneers' in any real sense. And some of John Lennon's stuff is absolutely dire; wishy washy hypocritical sentimental tosh. Goddam Hippy.. George Harrison did some interesting stuff with Indian music for a bit, worked with the likes of Ravi Shankhar, but again, a bit insipid really. And as for McCartney; ye Gods where to begin? ๐Ÿ˜ฏ

Yeah, Beatles for me too I think.

Oh, and for individual artist; Madonna. Yeah she's bin a round a very very long time, but what has she ever done where you can stand back and truly say 'that's great'?


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

oasis,oasis,oasis.oasis


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oh, and for individual artist; Madonna. Yeah she's bin a round a very very long time, but what has she ever done where you can stand back and truly say 'that's great'?

But it's POPular music, it's not supposed to be great, just appealing to the money giving drones who are looking for someone to give them an identity.
What method are we using to rate, apart from personal opinion?


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Beatles


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yeah we know that, Don, it's all 'pop' music of some sort really, in't it? No matter how seriously it takes itself.

I used Madonna cos she's always the 'most whatever' artist blah blah blah without ever having really produced anything genuinely outstanding.

What method are we using to rate, apart from personal opinion?

The [b]Elfinscale[/b] on the [b]Elfinometer[/b]; that tried and trusted barometer of what is good and what isn't.

There is no better evaluative mechanism.


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:36 pm
Posts: 1812
Free Member
 

MUSE


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:39 pm
Posts: 768
Free Member
 

Beatles


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

coldplay +1


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:42 pm
Posts: 10199
Full Member
 

the smiths


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:44 pm
Posts: 1930
Free Member
 

There's a few!

The Beatles
Radiohead
Oasis
The Clash
The Rolling Stones

Pointless thread of course as music is quite possibly the most subjective thing in the world.


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:44 pm
Posts: 14768
Full Member
 

I'll go for Beatles, U2 and Coldplay. Seen Muse live and they were awesome, albeit some of their later stuff is a bit poo


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Pink Floyd


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yeah we know that, Don, it's all 'pop' music of some sort really, in't it? No matter how seriously it takes itself.

Not really, no. There's Pop music where it's done simply for the money and I believe there are genuine artists out there who do it for the love of music and not popular acclaim.
Not all music is pop music, but all pop music is overrated if it's considered to be anything other than popular.
And I still hate elastic. ๐Ÿ‘ฟ


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:46 pm
Posts: 11589
Full Member
 

Beatles...right place, right time but that is it...


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i thought my suggestion for Beatles would be controversial but obviously not


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Beatles; complete rip off of the Rutles imo


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:52 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Another addition on mine:

Elbow "I'm a boring man, who sings sond like a child sitting in a pram"..yadda..whine....moan

Artic Monkeys "You look good, sitting on someone elses face.." yadda yadda"


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:54 pm
Posts: 91168
Free Member
 

The Doors I reckon are the most over-rated.

One of the most under-rated I think is the Kinks. Every time I hear one of their songs I am extremely impressed, and yet most people just think of 'you really got me'.


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:54 pm
 emsz
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

For me the hair metal stuff Bon Jovi that sort of thing. Nothing to say, tedious by the numbers dad rock. Awful


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

AC DC


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There's Pop music where it's done simply for the money and I believe there are genuine artists out there who do it for the love of music and not popular acclaim.

So you're saying the VengaBoys [i]din't[/i] do it for the money, then? ๐Ÿ˜ฏ

Plenty of people who 'do it for the love of music and not popular acclaim' are crap though. Which is why they never have much 'success'.

And I personally know some very talented musicians, who [i]only[/i] do it for the money.

And you can't accuse Timmy Mallet of ever believing his music would make him an incredibly wealthy world-renowned megastar....


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:55 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

One of the most under-rated I think is the Kinks

I agree and I prefer them way more than the Beatles - always thought Davis was a far better wordsmith than he ever got credit for. I bloody hate "You really got me" though ๐Ÿ˜ฎ


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 6:57 pm
Posts: 10199
Full Member
 

hair metal

what is the genre of metal I appear to have missed it?


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 7:03 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Ohhh another..

Status Quo "a boring song, dinky, dink, dinky dinky"


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 7:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So you're saying the VengaBoys din't do it for the money, then?

Maybe, I'd be more definite if I knew who they were/are! ๐Ÿ˜•
And I personally know some very talented musicians, who only do it for the money.

Does that actually mean that one side of their music ability is commercially successful and allows them to indulge themselves in other areas? I'm quite sure that the majority of people mentioned above are talented and do it for the money, just not artists.
And you can't accuse Timmy Mallet of ever believing his music would make him an incredibly wealthy world-renowned megastar....

No, but with his talent he's not doing too badly for a wouldbe shelf stacker at Tesco, is he?
๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 20/10/2011 7:06 pm
Page 1 / 7