Forum menu
Bit down on bowside ๐
What do you expect when both the cox and stroke are shifting weight?
What do you expect when both the cox and stroke are shifting weight?
that's probably the ****iest thing I've ever read on this site
๐
Might I suggest you do some more reading then?
Might I suggest you do some more reading then?
๐
that's probably the ****iest thing I've ever read on this site
that's probably the ****iest thing I've ever read on this site ๐
Brave man CM. ๐
Does anyone have a picture of a Flying Banhammer?
๐
Right videos not working so:
[url=
rotor ****el[/url]
[url=
take off howl[/url]
(plus a [url= http://youtu.be/G0aLQ3srOrs ]low flypast[/url])
Possibly my favourite youtube video [url= http://youtu.be/hvDDDKnNhuE ]of all time[/url]
and finally
a less elegant but similarly awe inspiring solution to the problem solved in Jamie's post
[url= http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1210/5107817218_ce5dde3fa9.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1210/5107817218_ce5dde3fa9.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrmichaelwright/5107817218/ ]P1000565[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/mrmichaelwright/ ]mrmichaelwright[/url], on Flickr
Ekranoplan!
This;
[img][url= http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6089/6118054906_5fea810e50.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6089/6118054906_5fea810e50.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/52042204@N02/6118054906/ ]IMG_6075[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/52042204@N02/ ]toppers3933[/url], on Flickr[/img]
and this;
[url= http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6071/6118055500_55867ee768.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6071/6118055500_55867ee768.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/52042204@N02/6118055500/ ]IMG_6183[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/52042204@N02/ ]toppers3933[/url], on Flickr
dammit drummer!!!!!
this was pretty cool too;
[url= http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6064/6117533659_889ab69bfc.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6064/6117533659_889ab69bfc.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/52042204@N02/6117533659/ ]IMG_6489[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/52042204@N02/ ]toppers3933[/url], on Flickr
Ah, we're on to planes.
/interest in thread.
A lesson in the power of steam....
So, the guns are ok, but the sex toy not. Which would be least appropriate for a child to have access to?
Are you questioning the mods, Charlie? ๐ฏ
Though there is the implication given how we've been told this place works that somebody reported the post which has gone - maybe we should report the ones with guns in?
CharlieMungus - MemberSo, the guns are ok, but the sex toy not. Which would be least appropriate for a child to have access to?
I played cowboys and indians as a kid. I never played cowboys and machine-assisted masturbators.
Also the guns are serious responses to the thread, content not punchlines. If you post up a really mechanically interesting and aesthetically pleasing vibrator, maybe that'll be OK ๐
Its all fab I would buy whole lot if the loto came up this week,apart from the guns and that Kona shut & cut what going on there? yuk.
Also the guns are serious responses to the thread, content not punchlines. If you post up a really mechanically interesting and aesthetically pleasing vibrator, maybe that'll be OK
Well, the point was double edged, yes the ramapant rabbit makes people say "oh my, that's lovely" but also in design terms it represented a large step change in the design and functionality of vibrators. If you take the time to look at the design and think about the it's use, you will see the synergy of form and function which is present in an only in, all great design classics. The rampant rabbit is so well recognised as a classic that it actually features in the Design Museum on the South Bank. Yet it somehow fails to meet some individual's criterion on here. Oh well, can't expect the provinces to be as 'hip' as that there London.


































