Forum menu
Kids smoking spliff...
 

[Closed] Kids smoking spliffs in cars - inform Police, or not?

Posts: 16175
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#8238134]

Out running on the local Moor tonight I passed 3 separate cars all full of kids with a smoke haze and smell of weed coming out from them.

They were not directly harming anyone else, so half of me thinks leave them to it, the other half of me thinks, what happens if they cause an accident whilst driving home....

What would you do?


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Biscuits anyone?


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:18 pm
Posts: 43955
Full Member
 

What would you do if they were drinking cans of cider instead?

[quote=wrightyson ]Biscuits anyone?

Munchies already?


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:19 pm
Posts: 3918
Full Member
 

If they were all shitfaced [s]Strongbow[/s]advocaat what would you do. They are not directly harming anyone, after all.


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Help youself.
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Saw the same the other evening, but parked up right in the middle of the village next to the (still open) co-op.

Personally I wouldn't say anything, I'm not sure the police would do much anyhow


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:21 pm
Posts: 13554
Free Member
 

I'm guessing 3 pages. Pass the biscuits please.


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Leave them to it. If they have to wind the windows down the hotbox will be ruined


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:25 pm
Posts: 33207
Full Member
 

The Police are getting much keener on drug driving at the moment. I smell it from passing cars far too often when riding on the road.

I'd report it, because they are in cars. The Police would need to check if the driver was smoking and go from there anyway.

If they were just walking along the street, I wouldn't report it.


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd treat it the same as being drunk in charge. I reported my neighbour when he drove home drunk. Take the car out of the equation and I couldn't give a monkey's.


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:27 pm
Posts: 13496
Full Member
 

It's my perception (as someone who works day in day with 17/18yr olds) that most are oblivious that drug drink is just as bad as drink driving. Drink driving (even one) is a complete social taboo in that generation; drug driving not so much.

Do you think the driving was partaking?


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:27 pm
Posts: 34537
Full Member
 

Happy days

Stash it in your pants the cops never search there.


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:27 pm
Posts: 12336
Full Member
 

The Police are getting much keener on drug driving at the moment.

Understandable really; it's a stressful job.


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:28 pm
Posts: 9440
Full Member
 

๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:29 pm
Posts: 13554
Free Member
 

oblivious that drug drink is just as bad as drink driving.

Obliviousness will be the result of being drunk and drugged or drug drink as the kids call it . Never mix the grape and leaf.


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:32 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

As I see it, you have three options;
1 - Kill the kids
2 - Kill yourself
3 - KILL [b][i][u]EVERYBODY![/u][/i][/b]


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:34 pm
Posts: 13554
Free Member
 

4 - bring some cakes and join them


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:37 pm
Posts: 57403
Full Member
 

Report it! Definitely! The major problem facing the police and society generally is kids smoking weed in car parks. Before you know it.. Armageddon. order needs to be maintained! They'll be right on it! Otherwise the Daily Mail will be furious!


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:37 pm
Posts: 13554
Free Member
 

I don't think they were actually in a car park Binners and that's why the Police need to be involved. There are unwritten codes of conduct when it comes to partaking of jazz woodbines.


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

let them have their nice things and go home and read your daily mail.


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:44 pm
Posts: 24858
Free Member
 

Legality of the drugs aside, would you report drink drivers? Even if the driver isn't partaking, if he's in the car with them he'll be passively getting stoned, and more likely as a result to kill them all along with whoever he runs into.


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:46 pm
Posts: 13643
Free Member
 

Banana in the tailpipe


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Out running on the local Moor tonight I passed 3 separate cars all full of kids with a smoke haze and smell of weed coming out from them.

They were not directly harming anyone else, so half of me thinks leave them to it, the other half of me thinks, what happens if they cause an accident whilst driving home....

What would you do?

Nothing, because here in London I'd be reporting about every 2nd car!


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:47 pm
Posts: 6985
Free Member
 

shermer75 - in a eddie murphy voice i hope.


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:50 pm
Posts: 8859
Free Member
 

funkmasterp - Member
I'm guessing 3 pages. Pass the biscuits please.

Nah, he failed to mention their skin colour, ethnicity, religion........two pages, max.


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:57 pm
 WTF
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

On recent Traffic Cops tv show the driver of a car was found to be over the alcohol limit by about 4 times.
Strangely though he was also several times the limit for cannabis and several times the limit for cocaine?
When did they introduce safe limits to drive with either, I was under impression it was an almost zero tolerance?


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:57 pm
Posts: 4954
Free Member
 

It would have to be an exceptional hot box to be passively stoned.


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:58 pm
Posts: 13192
Free Member
 

did it smell like quality weed or just crappy solid? ๐Ÿ˜ฎ
can you even get solid nowadays?


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:59 pm
Posts: 9232
Full Member
 

Don't care about weed generally. People driving when they may still be under the influence does bother me though. I wouldn't turn a blind eye to it anymore than I would drink driving. If that makes me 'square' frankly I don't give a shit.


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 11:09 pm
Posts: 78515
Full Member
 

I'd report it, because they are in cars

Likewise.


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 11:10 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

They were not directly harming anyone else, so half of me thinks leave them to it, the other half of me thinks, what happens if they cause an accident whilst driving home....

driving under the influence, they are potentially harming a lot of people with that one. Sometimes what kids need is a good solid warning from a copper to point out that maybe they will turn a blind eye in some places but not when it involves cars.

Daddy isn't coming home tonight the kids smoking weed knocked him off his bike, Merry Christmas.


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 11:12 pm
Posts: 7121
Free Member
 

Grass them up.. Just dont make a Hash of it though


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 11:14 pm
Posts: 16175
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Ok mixed views. Were the drivers participating? Well unless they had their own oxygen supply in the cars then yes.

I've seen car accidents that were the result of alcohol where people have been badly injured. My wife has had to screw people back together who have been smoking weed.


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 11:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So an honest actual real life result from this. An ex labourer of mine got pulled on the road back to Derbyshire from skegVegas by the old Bill, they pulled him as they smelt weed as he zipped by on a 50mph road apparently! Road side "test" blah blah. "Failed" that but back at the station passed it so they swabbed him for the works. He'd had coke the night before, it came up positive but was let go as he was deemed unimpeded by it and left to drive away/pick up his car at that point. Went to court a few months ago and got a 12 month ban. All seems a bit hotchpotch pitch to me.


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 11:24 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 11:29 pm
Posts: 13643
Free Member
 

shermer75 - in a eddie murphy voice i hope.

Of course! ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 11:30 pm
Posts: 2746
Free Member
 

It would have to be an exceptional hot box to be passively stoned.

Proper old mini makes a good one


Happy days
Stash it in your pants the cops never search there.

Oh, they do !


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 11:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Must admit i've been in cars with stoned drivers in the past, they don't/i didn't see it as a problem at the time(It's not as bad as drink driving, but its still unacceptable tbh).

Being honest i doubt i'd personally stick someone i know in, so I'm aware I'd be part of the problem(talking historically, it's been years, and we did actually been caught by the polis too, nothing happened to any of us, but this was the late 90s. polis were more interested in finding out if i'd divulge info on the local loonballs, i had no info to divulge even if i wanted to, they were bawbags about that actually but that's another story) But i do agree with the zero tolerance approach to stoned driving.

Bit shit sticking a whole load of people in for weed, but i guess we need to start the zero tolerance thing somewhere to get the message across.

A good start would be providing legal establishments where people can smoke their lungs out away from the cars.


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 11:42 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

Bit shit sticking a whole load of people in for weed, but i guess we need to start the zero tolerance thing somewhere to get the message across.

Not really, they all got in the car knowing that one of them would be driving back, it's as bad as getting your mate to drive you up somewhere with a few bottles of white lightening then being surprised he was pissed too.
The police have many ways to deal with stuff that doesn't involve prosecution.


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 11:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Guess there is 2 points here, drivers being stoned and passengers being stoned.

There later isn't a problem, but tbh I would say that, I've no problem sparking up on a journey with the window open, if the driver allows it.

If you are sitting in a car park and the car is full of smoke, well, the drivers getting stoned too, that much is obvious.

Guess you just need to judge the situation as you see it.


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 11:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 11:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

mikewsmith - Member
it's as bad as getting your mate to drive you up somewhere with a few bottles of white lightening then being surprised he was pissed too

That's only bad if you allow them to get back in the motor and drive home after tanning said bottle.

The point here is really what the driver is doing, long as the passengers aren't imparring the driver, then there's no real issue imo.


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 11:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

๐Ÿ˜† vongassit - Member


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 11:54 pm
Posts: 1617
Free Member
 

shermer75 - Member
Banana in the tailpipe

Bit harsh, they won't be able to sit down and enjoy their Christmas dinner.


 
Posted : 21/12/2016 12:02 am
Posts: 44816
Full Member
 

Interesting one.

Evidence on drug driving is poor and establishing at what levels people are impaired is difficult. the little decent testing tends to show spliffs and driving is nothing like the impairment of drink driving or using a mobile but more like being tired. thats people smoking and then driving in a controlled environment where they are concentrating on driving well. In these circumstances spliffs are much less impairing than alcohol

Post crash analysis shows a lot of drug driving but without knowing the incidence in the population its hard to know if its causal or coincidental and polypharmacia / drinks mixed in is also common in the post crash analysis

Of course mixing drink and spliffs even when blood alcohol levels would be legal is a disaster for accident rates.

Beware reefer madness stories in the papers colouring your view. the real evidence of the effects on spliffs and driving is not good or clear and indeed contradictory

I do dob in drink drivers. Never really been in the position the OP was in. If its a regular hangout then maybe yes and if the kids are showing off in the cars then certainly yes. concentrating on driving well there appears to be little impairment but showing off / driving fast etc then certainly its dangerous as concentration is impaired.

Finally - should this be a police priority? Id rather they were sorting out the drunks driving or not.

So - long answer to a short question. NOt easy to me, not clear and obvious. No decent evidence to make an evidence based decision on


 
Posted : 21/12/2016 12:11 am
Page 1 / 3