No - they're going to try locking him in a stylish 50s cupboardallthepies - MemberDoes plan G involve an ice pick ?
Presumably, this year's conference is all round to Jeremy's then?
A historical first. No conference because Jeremy and his pals have managed to bugger up a perfectly good arrangement that always worked before.
Forward to the next triumph, Comrades!!
Binners that's my impression of John McDonnell controlling things as well. Really Corbyn is little more than a puppet being played.
Presumably, this year's conference is all round to Jeremy's then?
Or go halfs with the Lib Dems?
FFS how is it 'Jeremy and his pals?'
The NEC (who are so pro-Corbyn they retrospectively enforced a cut off date beyond which new members are barred from voting in the leadership election) voted last year to boycott G4S.
The GMB who support Owen Smith have said they'll picket if the alternative company is used.
This comrade shit is getting incredibly fatuous too.
Paging Jambalaya...
Derek Grintz who you've used 2 or 3 times as an example of momentums racism is NOT a real person. You must have missed the last time I said that on this thread which is fair enough but if you post anything from him again I'll send him round your house.
This [s]comrade shit[/s] entire topic is getting incredibly fatuous too
ftfy
Ahem...
f
t
f
y
surely?
I always get the impression that he never wanted the job in the first place. But since he accidentally got elected (oops!), John McDonnell has been telling him that he's being the *ing leader whether he *ing well likes it or not!!!
Pretty much on the money I think. I mate of mine in the party told me it's pretty much common knowledge among those with their ear to the ground that he never wanted it, and doesn't really want to be PM. This is why I don't understand the impatience of the PLP as I'm convinced he would have stepped aside before the next election anyway.
Maybe his controllers won't let him step aside.
It's a good point though as he's lost his cool a few times with jurno's and we have nothing like the pressure of GE. I can't actually see him coping come GE time.
[quote=Lifer ]FFS how is it 'Jeremy and his pals?'
The NEC (who are so pro-Corbyn they retrospectively enforced a cut off date beyond which new members are barred from voting in the leadership election) voted last year to boycott G4S.
The GMB who support Owen Smith have said they'll picket if the alternative company is used.
This comrade shit is getting incredibly fatuous too.
THIS
hy the obsession with your RW of making shit up ?
there are so some many own goals being handed to you by Labour why do you still have to ruin it all by talking bollocks and making up the causes?
Its not required and only makes you look like a blatant purveyor of untruths.
you seem to be labouring under the misapprehension that Jamby uses facts, cares about facts or needs them for his opinionYou must have missed the last time I said that on this thread
He is not limited by such concerns
I thought Jeremy's attempt at scathing sarcasm ("Tax exile on holiday...") was particularly pathetic, even from him.
Owner defends his company from accusations likely to be interpreted as detrimental to future sales, shockah.
I got the impression that Jez feels he's in some way superior to Branson. Can't imagine why. He's the result of a big gob and an incredible stroke of luck, rather than anything achieved with effort and ambition.
Same "joke" writer as you?I thought Jeremy's attempt at scathing sarcasm ("Tax exile on holiday...") was particularly pathetic, even from him.
Oh, it was supposed to be a joke?
I hadn't realised.
Maybe you can help me understand woppit, what is the motivation for stockpiling billions of quid?
Don't get me wrong, I admire the [i]drive[/i] of someone that slaves their guts out half their life to accrue vast wealth (and well done you woppit for admiring his efforts) but isn't collecting money as mental as collecting cats, or matchboxes or bottles of your own urine in the back bedroom?
What's the attraction and why do you believe that we should worship such people as heroes?
That's a hell of a weird religion you're touting there 😯
"The only way out of poverty for any society, is jobs."
Defending his company by (potentially) breaching data protection rules. Oops.
... and by "jobs", I don't mean "state-provided-work".
Not the same thing...
G4S have provided security to the Labour Party annul conference for the best part of 20 years. They actually turned down the work this year because of the abuse dished out to their employees at the conference last year - as well as verbal abuse the staff were repeatedly spat at by the Momentum [s] ambassadors for the new kind of friendly respectful politics [/s] sixth formers
The only way out of poverty for any society, is jobs.
well ok... [i]sort[/i] of (ish)
but isn't poverty [i]caused[/i] by people stockpiling vast sums of money for themselves?
Do you think that maybe you've based your religion on the story of the snake eating it's own tail?
What about the ants, and the whales and the birds and the zebras? Are they supposed to just sit around watching this obscene phenomenon in horror, rubbing the snake's belly so that they may be granted the pleasure of eating a morsel of it's shit?
The LoLabour farce continues!
http://teamrock.com/news/2016-08-26/labour-party-sees-red-over-foo-fighters-facebook-post
Mr Woppit - MemberI thought Jeremy's attempt at scathing sarcasm ("Tax exile on holiday...") was particularly pathetic, even from him.
You didn't support something which Jeremy Corbyn said ? Really ?
Well if it happens again be sure to tell us .... won't you ?
You never know I might change my mind about Corbyn if you keep telling me how pathetic you think he is.
@just65minutes We have covered this complete lie with direct quotes from g4s
Its a lie today as it was yesterday
just5minutes - Member
G4S have provided security to the Labour Party annul conference for the best part of 20 years. They actually turned down the work this year because of the abuse dished out to their employees at the conference last year - as well as verbal abuse the staff were repeatedly spat at by the Momentum ambassadors for the new kind of friendly respectful politics sixth formers
Source?
[b]Eric Alexander, managing director for G4S events[/b], said the company would usually start planning for such a large and complex event up to a year in advance. “Safety for delegates and our staff is our priority and at this late stage and with our teams committed elsewhere, we are not in a position to step in and provide security for the conference,” he said.“Security officers need to be cleared and accredited to work, detailed risk assessments made, safety and security plans with the Home Office and local police forces drawn up and supporting logistics, such as security equipment and staff accommodation, put in place
“Our team of more than 100 security staff has secured the Labour party’s annual conference for over 20 years and the feedback from officials and the police on our work last year, as in the past, was extremely positive. [b]Clearly we were disappointed not to continue such a successful working relationship.”[/b]
The LoLabour farce continues!
She's a vegan. Clearly a green infiltrator.
Its a lie today as it was yesterday
if they
paint
it on a bus it will
become
the truth
@ctk, hi been away from the computer. Unless someone has developed some sort of Trotskiest spambot that account is maintained by a real person, no ? One who repeatedly threatens others with physcial violence including "round their house". He is absolutely the sort of individual who would inflict abuse on others he felt to be Zionists, you know like G4S security staff. He's also big on conspriacy theories of the sort that has Mossad responsible for 9/11 or numerous other Jihadi terrorist attacks.
Chapeau to Labour today, so far they seem to have managed a whole day without further disaster.
@Lifer I would think any such potential breach was well worth it to expose the lies being pedalled by Corbyn and his cronies. The data protection thing is a lottle bizarre as live webcam is fine, no permission needed. However once stored its an issue.
CaptainFlashheart - MemberThe LoLabour farce continues!
http://teamrock.com/news/2016-08-26/labour-party-sees-red-over-foo-fighters-facebook-post
This thread is becoming weird. Flashheart has now posted a link backing Corbyn supporters claim that there is an orchestrated campaign by the Labour establishment against them.
I thought Flashheart was supportive of the campaign by the Labour elite against Corbyn ? Has he switched sides ? What's going on ?
Wow - that bit on the letter about the General Secretary refusing membership for "any reason he/she sees fit" is a bit open to abuse isn't it?CaptainFlashheart - MemberThe LoLabour farce continues!
http://teamrock.com/news/2016-08-26/labour-party-sees-red-over-foo-fighters-facebook-post
CFH I can't understand why if you where joining Labour you'd give them your social media accounts. Easiest just to say none, that would have been my approach 😉
Friday lunchtime Bellini's again was it Jambas?
I reckon you're only gonna be able to squeeze in a couple more before your spelling goes the way of your content 🙂
Sources close to the company warned that the short notice it was given and previous incidents at the event, including staff being spat at and verbally abused, made it impossible for G4S to accept the offer.
Name the "sources close to the company".
This thread is becoming weird
just pages
and pages
of
made up stuff
and
abuse
even thm has become
part
of the post truth politics
he
recently professed to find
shameful
sic transit
only in someones dreams fred
just5minutes - Member"Sources close to the company warned that the short notice it was given and previous incidents at the event, including staff being spat at and verbally abused, made it impossible for G4S to accept the offer."
And yet in the same article an actual employee of the company says
"Clearly we were disappointed not to continue such a successful working relationship. Safety for delegates and our staff is our priority and at this late stage and with our teams committed elsewhere, we are not in a position to step in and provide security for the conference."
posted a link backing Corbyn supporters claim that there is an orchestrated campaign by the Labour establishment against them.
Yep, that's exactly why I posted the link. Exactly that.
Have ten Internet Awesomeness Points.
Wow. Who knew a company could do a formal briefing and an off the record one at the same time. Imagine if that ever happened in politics....
By the way the spitting isn't just confined to the Labour conference - even Labour's own members have been abused and spat at - see below article for quote from the secretary of Tottenham Labour Party.
Presumably Tottenham Labour party are also part of of the conspiracy against Corbyn.
Meanwhile back in the real world - remember 5 September we need to have some semblance of a shadow/mirage cabinet. The Westminster fun and games restart, "ready or not...."
just5minutes - Member
Wow. Who knew a company could do a formal briefing and an off the record one at the same time. Imagine if that ever happened in politics....By the way the spitting isn't just confined to the Labour conference - even Labour's own members have been abused and spat at - see below article for quote from the secretary of Tottenham Labour Party.
Presumably Tottenham Labour party are also part of of the conspiracy against Corbyn.
How is abuse of a pro-Corbyn activist 'part of the conspiracy against Corbyn'?
It said: “Two pro-Corbyn activists who travelled from London to a rally hosted by Momentum, the left-wing network of the Labour leader’s supporters, were allegedly branded ‘scum’ and told to ‘get the **** out of Brighton’ by local members.“Seema Chandwani, the secretary of Tottenham Labour Party, told the Morning Star that she and a colleague had been threatened with violence by two moderates in a pub
Or is your point that there are idiots everywhere?
Wry smile at 'threatened with violence by two moderates' btw
ernie_lynch - MemberFlashheart has now posted a link backing Corbyn supporters claim that there is an orchestrated campaign by the Labour establishment against them.
CaptainFlashheart - MemberYep, that's exactly why I posted the link. Exactly that.
Have ten Internet Awesomeness Points.
I didn't give any reason at all as to why you posted the link. I simply commented on how it was bizarre that you should post a link which clearly backs claims made by Corbyn supporters.
Lose ten Internet Awesomeness Points for being incapable of reading a post 😆
Lose ten Internet Awesomeness Points for being incapable of reading a post
Blimey its catching!
Anyway back to the "not wanting to win" issue - here's George Eaton writing earlier this year
This is not the only electoral parallel between the two men. In 2015, both achieved remarkable and unanticipated victories. Cameron won a parliamentary majority, an outcome he thought so improbable that he had not prepared a speech. Corbyn became Labour leader but it was a result he originally neither wanted nor expected. [b]“Now we need to make sure I don’t win,”[/b] he had told supporters after he made the ballot.
New (RW !! ) Statesman March 2016 - honestly this biased media!!
Feel free to retract Ernie or tell me, what does this quoting a source tell about me?
teamhurtmore - MemberFeel free to retract Ernie or tell me, what does this quoting a source tell about me?
I'll tell you what it says about you - that you are prepared to dig up any old bollocks in an attempt discredit Corbyn, although you yourself are allegedly "politically neutral" 🙂
As Corbyn's leadership campaign rolled on his support reached unprecedented levels. The sheer amount of leadership campaign rallies he attended is the stuff of legends.
[url= http://www.theguardian.com/politics/video/2015/sep/11/jeremy-corbyn-final-rally-saturday-labour-leadership-vote-result-video ]Jeremy Corbyn holds 99th rally ahead of Saturday's leadership vote[/url]
I attended one of those rallies, at no time did I hear him tell supporters “Now we need to make sure I don’t win”.
To claim that he tirelessly traveled the country and attended more campaign rallies than probably all the other candidates put to together but wanted to lose is ridiculous.
He might not have the same personal self-serving selfish motivation which someone like Tony Blair has, but that doesn't mean that he is any less motivated.
