Forum search & shortcuts

iPad retina or iPad...
 

[Closed] iPad retina or iPad mini

Posts: 14493
Free Member
 

Except retina costs more.

And most phones have a smaller screen size.

It's all a compromise, something that the individual buyer needs to weigh up.

Mag content is fine on the mini, screen res is also fine. If you want the best, then pay more, if you don't then pay less.


 
Posted : 09/02/2013 10:31 am
 Ewan
Posts: 4401
Free Member
 

Or get a nexus 7.... Cheaper and higher res.


 
Posted : 09/02/2013 12:57 pm
Posts: 6780
Free Member
 

I had a similar decision.

Wanted to read PDF's, books (technical ones, not novels) and magazines so went with the bigger screen. it is quite large and heavyish, definitely get the smaller one if you're taking it out with you on a regular basis.

The resolution on the iPad mini seemed fine to me, though a retina on its way http://www.expertreviews.co.uk/tablet-pcs/1297756/ipad-mini-2-release-date-features-and-price-rumours


 
Posted : 09/02/2013 1:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If you can wait a wee while the ipad5 is going to be sized between the retina and mini models, check out mac rumours web site they have some info
if you can wait x time, the apple y will solve the Middle East conflict according to the Mac rumours websites!


 
Posted : 09/02/2013 1:21 pm
Posts: 14493
Free Member
 

Ewan - Member
Or get a nexus 7.... Cheaper and higher res.

POSTED 1 HOUR AGO #

Looked at the mini, nexus, and kindle fire. For my purposes the mini was the best of the three options.

Nexus as a user experience, and entirely from my perspective came a poor second to the mini. Just didn't like it at all.

Like I've said, the res on the mini (for me) is absolutely fine. If I was forced to choose from the kindle fire or nexus I'd go with the kindle. If I used these things for games, that might change.


 
Posted : 09/02/2013 2:51 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

The screen is pretty low res tho

I know.. I have one. I'm posting this from it right now! It's really not any sort of problem!

. Which means you may as well just get an mobile phone

Well, no. I've also got an iPhone 5 with a retina screen. It's good, but the iPad mini is better because the screen is bigger. Totally different animals. I think the iPhone is more in need of the retina screen than the iPad to be honest.
I'm very happy with my mini. It's been in constant use since I bought it a few weeks after they were launched. I like its size, the light weight and the price. It's also a beautifully made little thing. 🙂


 
Posted : 09/02/2013 3:23 pm
Posts: 3669
Full Member
 

Android has impressed me to the degree where I'm thinking of ditching the iPhone when the time comes and getting a nexus 4 (or whatever).

I've done just that and bought a nexus 4 which arrived yesterday. Android has done a fair bit of catching up on apple since my brief venture with a froyo HTC desire.

The current iPad mini is 2 generations of iPad out of date and for this they charge £350 for the 32gb model. Hardly what I'd call value for money.
I will happily buy apple products (or any other companies) when they spec their devices with the components that the price tag deserves.


 
Posted : 09/02/2013 5:11 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

Well went to look at the iPad Mini today. Nicer than I expected but I couldn't get past the lack of retina.
And the answer to my "are mags readable without zooming in?" question is a clear "no".

(Sent from my iPad 3... from soft play 🙂 )


 
Posted : 09/02/2013 5:37 pm
 SOAP
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Went in apple today with the intention of buying a iPad mini.
Could not bring myself to do it after comparing it to the retina iPad.
Nice enough but in a different league.
Will wait and see if they release the mini retina in March.


 
Posted : 09/02/2013 6:52 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

my "are mags readable without zooming in?" question is a clear "no".

You need glasses.


 
Posted : 09/02/2013 6:55 pm
Posts: 848
Free Member
 

There's nothing that could persuade me to use anything with Windows as an OS. I use a PC at work with Windows on it, admittedly an old OS; XP, I think, but I absolutely hate it.

Fair enough - we all are free to choose what we want. Having said that XP is now pretty old (over 10 years) but at the time was a very good OS. Times have changed and moved on since then. Windows 7 was overall a very good release - quite possibly the best Windows version ever. Windows 8 has changed the Microsoft game by going fully touch which has enabled a lot of potential in the device market giving lots of choice across a spread of prices. I can't help nodding admiringly in the direction of Apple and what they have achieved over the last 15 years from a company that was almost dead and buried. However, having spent some time looking at their devices I'm not so sure they as good or as far ahead of the competition as popular opinion would suggest. And their products do come at a cost.


 
Posted : 09/02/2013 7:06 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

> my "are mags readable without zooming in?" question is a clear "no".
You need glasses.

Well, I tried looking at the "PDF High" version of Issue 79 on the iPad Mini in the Apple store and I found I couldn't read the article text without having to zoom in. Can you?

Seems fair enough because the ipad mini is about half the size of the magazine page and has a much lower res than print.

On the Retina display on my full-blown iPad I can comfortably read it. Which is also fair enough as it is almost the same size as the magazine page and near print resolution.


 
Posted : 09/02/2013 7:39 pm
Posts: 14493
Free Member
 

Different people with different requirements have different preferences shocker!!!


 
Posted : 09/02/2013 8:49 pm
Posts: 12089
Full Member
 

83Gb, out of 128!
http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/05/microsoft-surface-pro-review/
There's nothing that could persuade me to use anything with Windows as an OS. I use a PC at work with Windows on it, admittedly an old OS; XP, I think, but I absolutely hate it.

Thing is, a Surface Pro is a proper computer, with a proper OS. Not just a tablet. If you really want to compare it to an Apple product, try comparing it to a Macbook Air - get past the fact that Apple uses base 10 to report disk sizes (a cheap sleight of hand to make them look bigger), and the difference is minimal. http://www.zdnet.com/surface-pro-versus-macbook-air-whos-being-dishonest-with-storage-space-7000011009/

To the OP: I've been living with a 7" tablet for over a year now, and while it's ideal for Twitter and email over breakfast (which is what I wanted it for, basically), it's not great for extended web browsing. You have to use the zoom too much. It is, of course, a lot lighter which is nice on the odd occasion I've used it while travelling.


 
Posted : 10/02/2013 8:17 am
Page 2 / 2