Forum menu
I think wheeling out a conversation with a NotW journalist as evidence wasn't the best prosecution tactic.
Is it right that the main point of the trial concerned un-declared income in the form of a bung (from the sale of Crouch)? Ridiculous really - like asking a mugger to fill in a tax return.
Woohoooooooooo! He's got the green light to replace Postman Pat when the FA sack him next week 😀
I did find it quite amusing that the main prosecution evidence came from such a massively credible source as a News of the World journalist.
So... how much tax is he meant to have avoided? And how much has this whole farce cost the taxpayer?
hmmmmmmmmm,
oh well at least he'll be able to take the england job now.
What I could not understand is why he would go to such lengths to try and avoid tax on less than £200k.
I mean, he must be rather wealthy and be on a vast salary, so what is the point of avoiding tax on (for him) such a small amount.
are you referring to Sir Harry, England Manager?
Can he be prosecuted for not wearing a seatbelt?
[url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/16960250 ]hanging's too good for him.[/url]