[Closed] David Icke at Wembley last Saturday

Perhaps you should read the thread in it's entirety, or even just the last page :wink::

I can totally understand where you're coming from with that, however 'proper' evidence is:

a) A lot more sensitive, with victims anonymity necessary for their dignity.

b) Far more intensive and time consuming to study in all its detail

c) Not suitable for sharing in the public domain whilst ongoing investigations are underway.

What I have tried to do is compile sufficient evidence of cases already completed and publicized so as to give you an insight into the bigger picture.

I appreciate the level of skepticism displayed, but stand by my claims.

Yeah but that's pretty much standard defence. Given what you're claiming if you can't come up with anything credible that you can actually share in any form then it comes back to the 'I know more than you do' situation that is the norm for conspiracists

That then isn't helped by previous claims which are basically X spoke to Y or was photographed with Z and therefore there's a huge conspiracy rather than just the more likely situation that people with power, money and or fame tend to know eachother.

Look trust him he has the proof he just cannot show you it right now.
I know he would be fine it he lizard illuminati gave this as an explanation

None so blind as those who cannot see

If we were playing Conspiracy Theory Bullshit Bingo, everyone on this thread would have a full house by now.

Look trust him he has the proof he just cannot show you it right now.

The Fermat Defence?

Hasn't that been proven (and published) though? 🙂

Cougar - Moderator 
you can count on my slipping it into more credible threads every now and again to keep everyone on their toes.
I refer you to your recent warning.

[b]We've no issues with threads like this one discussing your hoary ideas, but derailing other threads and disrupting ongoing conversations isn't on.[/b]

POSTED 1 HOUR AGO # REPORT-POST

Jeeez
Like walking on egg shells on here!
A bit OTT I would say 🙄

It's a bit like getting schrodinger to flash his pussy this thread.

Jeeez
Like walking on egg shells on here!
A bit OTT I would say

It's not like walking on egg shells.
And it's not OTT either.

It's perfectly logical, just like it would be in real life.

If I knew someone in real life who suddenly started to derail every conversation and twist it round so he could preach shit to me about conspiracy theories, he would be told to shut up or **** off.

Once in a while, when it's relevant to the conversation is fine.

Other than that, people start to get pissed off. And the preacher ends up sitting alone in the corner of a pub muttering to nobody but themselves.

Like walking on egg shells on here!
A bit OTT I would say

FWIW he enters threads and says yes its terrible but what about - INSERT CONSPIRACY HERE- and this is not allowed and is a bit swiss Tony but without the humour

As you have just proven you can disagree with and even mock a mod openly so its hardly as you have portrayed it

The Fermat Defence?

There must be some kind of conspiracy at work, because I haven't had any warning...

anyway, exposing a vast global network involving those the media encourages you to revere is like making love to a beautiful woman.

You have to build it up slowly, working your way around, until things start to spread, then little by little, with a few teasers along the way, you go in for the kill, thrusting away until the climax. 😆

Now that's more like it 😉

anyway, exposing a vast global network involving those the media encourages you to revere is like making love to a beautiful woman.

he will have his day in court soon enough...the other bit well he has had some fanciful views but that one takes the biscuit.

something you dream about?

Might be a bit weird if I didn't eh, you?

Which do you reckon: Jessica Alba or Megan Fox?

Are you now saying that Jessica Alba is a kiddie fiddler?

FFS there you go lusting after

those the media encourages you to revere

They even got to you.

Are you now saying that Jessica Alba is a kiddie fiddler?

Not that I recall, are you?

FFS there you go lusting after

those the media encourages you to revere

They even got to you.

Well, I'm mostly human 😉

Junkyard - lazarus 
Like walking on egg shells on here!
A bit OTT I would say

TBH if you are worried about how "egg shelly " it is here [b]i would have thought the least wise response would be to highlight how much you disagree with a moderator and then roll your eyes at them[/b]
FWIW he enters threads and says yes its terrible but what about - INSERT CONSPIRACY HERE- and this is not allowed and is a bit swiss Tony but without the humour

As you have just proven you can disagree with and even mock a mod openly so its hardly as you have portrayed it
The Fermat Defence?

I would be happier if it was his last theorem
It has been proved - UK maths bod name escapes me- WILES - I checked

oh dear... Yes I very much disagreewith the moderator, jeewiz am I not aloud? Or have I got to lick ass like the rest of you sheep... 🙄
If I don't reply to the nonsense you put back it's probably that I've been banned or just can't be arsed! 😆

💡 more copying and pasting than me and worse spelling ...am I being trolled 😉

Of course you are allowed to disagree bit it negates your walking on egg shell claim?

How many times do I need to type it for you to get the point?

walking on egg shells :to be very diplomatic and inoffensive

It seems very strange to threaten people with bans for talking shit on a David Icke thread.

...to give you an insight into the bigger picture.

exposing a vast global network...

like the rest of you sheep...

The Second round of Conspiracy Theory Bullshit Bingo starts here.

Eyes down for a Full House !

It seems very strange to threaten people with bans for talking shit on a David Icke thread.

It might be because he tried to call me out, then got schooled...

or maybe he's a Freemason:

[img] [/img]

😆

is it just me or does that look like a massive knob

I'll take that compliment, thank you very much 😉

It seems very strange to threaten people with bans for talking shit on a David Icke thread.

We've no issues with threads like this one discussing your hoary ideas, but derailing other threads and disrupting ongoing conversations isn't on.

What in this statement leads you to conclude the opposite of what it says?

he tried to call me out, then got schooled.

does that look like a massive knob

It's OK, it's just my lizard tattoo!!

And my [s]3rd[/s] 4th eye...

Can you read ?

Yes. However, the Mod has apparently already issued him a warning earlier. Just seems a but strange with the topic of this thread. The Mods seem to be contradicting themselves.

Besides, as he seems to be upsetting a number of people on this thread why do they keep replying to him?

Consider it a community service.

or maybe he's a Freemason ....

Anyone got a line yet ?

[img] [/img]
Can't say too much but just throwing it out there like, you know, that sort of thing

Why can't you say too much ?

because Tom Cruise is here

If you're under duress tap once.

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]

Mention of Scientologists reminds me about this documentary about the anonymous movement.

Well worth a watch.

Looking at that [s]Dan Brown plot[/s] pyramid diagram again:

[img] [/img]

Say you want to become a policeman, lawyer, psychiatrist, journalist, social worker or one of those other professions in the purple "Core of Child Abuse".

At what point do you think they bring up that requirement?
I've never seen it mentioned in the job adverts. Do they just casually mention it during the interview or something?

Fair play Graham, your logic is spot on...

[rubbish joke] They have posters of those weird childrens beauty pageants they have in the U.S. behind the interviewer and monitor your body language. [/rubbish joke]

From what I understand, recruitment generally occurs over some time, outside the workplace, within the social network of lodges.

In some respects it's similar to grooming.

In all fairness cougar, I don't recall a recent warning:

would you care to clarify?

Yes, you were sent a warning yesterday. If you didn't receive it I'd suggest ensuring that the email address you have registered with the site is valid, or checking your email's spam filters. After all, I'd hate for you to get a lengthy ban due to you ignoring warnings.

Failing that, it's probably part of some big conspiracy.

Yes. However, the Mod has apparently already issued him a warning earlier. Just seems a but strange with the topic of this thread. The Mods seem to be contradicting themselves.

It was in relation to shoehorning in a 'won't somebody think of the children' conspiracy theory in another unrelated thread. I'm an advocate of freedom of speech, but we can't have the entire forum get bogged down with one person's personal agenda. Seems pretty consistent (and reasonable) to me, no?

Did you send the warning yourself Cougar?

because Tom Cruise is here

every thing is ok as satan has [url= http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/society/satan-quits-over-debenhams-christmas-advert-2014110492416 ]thrown in the towel[/url]