Forum search & shortcuts

David Icke at Wembl...
 

[Closed] David Icke at Wembley last Saturday

Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

My wrist slaps for swear filter avoidance come through fine though I only read them as it might also mean I won the Tuesday treat comps 😉

Anyway Tom has left he saw a tall aussie ginger and had to run


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 4:25 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

From what I understand, recruitment generally occurs over some time, outside the workplace, within the social network of lodges.

So does that mean it's only the police/lawyers/psychiatrists/journalists etc that also happen to be masons that are in this purple core? Non-masons are okay?

Don't the people in those professions who don't happen to be masons get a bit suspicious?

And does the "grooming" you suggest have a 100% take up rate? Surely there must occasionally be someone in those professions, who is mason, but just doesn't fancy raping children very much?

(Incidentally my dad is a regular at his local lodge and he's never laid a finger on me. Maybe I'm not his type).


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 4:26 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

I'm sure we're not supposed to talk about warnings on here....

Take it offline please (American business speak intentional!)
moderator@singletrackworld.com


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 4:26 pm
Posts: 35270
Full Member
 

[i]From what I understand, recruitment generally occurs over some time, outside the workplace, within the social network of lodges.[/i]

So that's masons (BTW have you ever met any masons?) , what about the child protection services, mil intel, psychiatrist (why them, and not say; doctors or dentists who have much more access to children), political media? the papers? TV? Radio? Family courts...? Wouldn't some-one who's been tapped for recruitment said something after all this time, seems unlikely that no one ever has?

As opposed the say: Jimmy Saville a vile, dirty old man who realised that under the cover of charitable works and choosing his victims carefully, could plausibly "get away with it for years" which he did...

edit; Dammit! beaten by GrahS again!!


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 4:26 pm
Posts: 12089
Full Member
 

So does that mean it's only the police/lawyers/psychiatrists/journalists etc that also happen to be masons that are in this purple core?

Don't the people in those professions who don't happen to be masons get a bit suspicious?

And what about masons that aren't in that group? Can they join the conspiracy too?


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 4:28 pm
Posts: 35270
Full Member
 

can we agree to stop using the phrase "purple core" please as well? it's all a bit y'know....


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 4:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You know what there might be something in this.
It's been a slow day at work so I took the time to "do my own research"* and found this:

[IMG] [/img]

Makes you think doesn't it


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 4:56 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

That wins teh interwebz for today!


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 4:57 pm
Posts: 35270
Full Member
 

I'm applying for a position in the propagation of idiocy High Command...It's about the only job I think I'm actually pretty qualified to do...


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 5:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So does that mean it's only the police/lawyers/psychiatrists/journalists etc that also happen to be masons that are in this purple core? Non-masons are okay?

Don't the people in those professions who don't happen to be masons get a bit suspicious?

And does the "grooming" you suggest have a 100% take up rate? Surely there must occasionally be someone in those professions, who is mason, but just doesn't fancy raping children very much?

Being as it's a control mechanism, they generally target professions with influence, but of course, that diagram is just to give insight into the basic premise, it's not comprehensive.

Not all ritual abuse is carried out in the name of Freemasonry; there are a number of secret societies, many of which link in covertly, some of which are entirely separate.

Of course, there is also several abusers who are not linked to any secret societies, either acting entirely independently, or being covertly manipulated by the networks who procure and traffick children, without knowing the background.

I'm sure your dad is a fine bloke and removed from the actions of the core abusers... as I've already said, the vast majority don't realize what is occurring.

With regards to the grooming, it's a long winded process, subtly done over a period of months and years, to ensure tolerance and indoctrination. Most commonly, recruits are from public/boarding school backgrounds, where they are conditioned from a young age. As a back up, compromising situations will be devised for blackmail purposes, should the recruit attempt to blow the whistle.

Nonetheless, there are some whistleblowers, who are of course always discredited by those around them.

For those reasons, I'm not going to provide any specific names, as of course you will find material to refute their claims.

However, you could google 'masonic ritual abuse' to get an idea of how widespread it is.


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 5:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

😆 Funny, not funny

Oh, alright it is funny

😆

Where did you get that, it has almost Chris Morris levels of genius!?!


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 5:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm currently debatorising whether I'm a bullshiner or a madeupwordist.


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 5:06 pm
Posts: 35270
Full Member
 

once more just for shits and giggles....

and this represents a "centralised control structure"....how?


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 5:07 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

recruits are from public/boarding school backgrounds, where they are conditioned from a young age.

And your proof for that is....?


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 5:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The backgrounds of the vast majority of the names I have which I can't currently mention for legal reasons.

And the well known prevalence of abuse in such institutions.


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 5:15 pm
Posts: 35270
Full Member
 

[i]And the well known prevalence of abuse in such institutions.[/i]

and your proof of this is...?

edit: is this theory just based around some hoary old tropes about civil servants, the masons, and public school fagging?


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 5:17 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

So, their background is [b]proof[/b] how?
Well known prevalence? Again, how and where is that [b]proof[/b] part of your statements. Also, what about the prevalence of abuse in Mancunian terraced houses, or Glaswegian blocks of flats*? Y'know, places where it's equally prevalent.

What a load of epic twaddle.

*Random examples, no intention to besmirch either.

Nick, no, it's more simple than that. It's the classic "They're toffs so they must be at it. Bad people, the lot of them". There's as much abuse in the state education sector, in the home, in anywhere, really. It's just nice and easy to prod at anyone in a perceived position of privilege.


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 5:18 pm
Posts: 35270
Full Member
 

[i]What a load of epic twaddle.[/i]

innit.

capt: aye, them vs us.


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 5:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

the names I have which I can't currently mention for legal reasons.

I'm not going to provide any specific names

I only need "..do your own research!" For a diagonal line !


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 5:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's a well known phenomenon...

As examples, staff at the schools of Nick Clegg, Boris Johnson, George Osborne, Tony Blair have all been linked to sexual abuse, but it is generally known that boarding schools are often rife with abuse.

And to clarify, though the above names may be complicit in the cover up of abuse, none have any direct allegations of paedophilia against them.

So, their background is proof how?
Well known prevalence? Again, how and where is that proof part of your statements. Also, what about the prevalence of abuse in Mancunian terraced houses, or Glaswegian blocks of flats*?

What kind of proof do you want?

Names of perpetrators?

Names of victims?

For obvious reasons, I can't give you those.

As for abuse in terraced houses and flats, yes, it is terrible, but it is not used for blackmail purposes to control political agendas which have national and international repercussions.


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 5:28 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

it is generally known that boarding schools are often rife with abuse.

It is also generally known that non-boarding schools are often rife with abuse. As examples, staff at the schools of Richard Head, , Mike Hunt and Ivor Bigun* have all been linked to sexual abuse.

Again, epic twaddle.

*And, obviously, not real people.


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 5:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As examples, staff at the schools of Nick Clegg, Boris Johnson, George Osborne, Tony Blair have all been linked to sexual abuse,

Which staff, which schools, what charges made, names and details please ?


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 5:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It is also generally known that non-boarding schools are often rife with abuse. As examples, staff at the schools of Richard Head, , Mike Hunt and Ivor Bigun* have all been linked to sexual abuse.

Again, epic twaddle.

Cool, so you provide epic twaddle as evidence, when I provide real names and real incidents... google any of the names mentioned regarding abuse in their schools; I just picked them off the top of my head but it is far more wide ranging

Failing that, here you go, let's make it simple eh?

[url= http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Abuse+in+boarding+schools ]Abuse in Boarding Schools[/url]

Which staff, which schools, names and details please ?

You've got the names, just add school and abuse and google to your hearts content...


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 5:40 pm
Posts: 35270
Full Member
 

[i]but it is generally known that boarding schools are often rife with abuse.[/i]

It is generally known?

So it is hoary old tropes...is dissapoint

here's a thought, Are places where there are children routinely away from parents and guardians attractive places to work for people who's sexual preferences involve children...? Could that be why there are lots of cases of abuse at those sorts of places? Because if you wanted to be with kids you'd go for scout master, school teacher, kids entertainer....rather than say baker, or mechanic, wouldn't you?

makes you think...


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 5:42 pm
Posts: 66133
Full Member
 

CaptainFlashheart - Member

recruits are from public/boarding school backgrounds, where they are conditioned from a young age.

And your proof for that is....?

The documentary Casino Royale


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 5:43 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

First to crop up;

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/robert-peston-sex-abuse-at-my-north-london-state-school-haunts-me-9650669.html

So, it would appear that abuse isn't exclusively a rich toffs at boarding school thing. Still, anyone who went to a boarding school is clearly "one of them" and so we can cheerily discredit anything they say.


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 5:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yeah but Peston is part of the establishment so is only saying that to throw you off the scent.

(saving jbj the hassle of posting his reply)


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 5:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So, it would appear that abuse isn't exclusively a rich toffs at boarding school thing.

No, but being in a sufficient position of power to influence national and international politics is far more likely to occur when you do come from that background.

i.e. the type of people the party whips/intelligence services want to coerce.


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 5:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You've got the names, just add school and abuse and google to your hearts content...

I've got names of apparently irrelevant pupils who attended the same school.

I was asking for the names of the teachers/staff.
The charges that were brought against them.
The verdicts of the trials etc.

You know... The details.


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 5:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've got names of apparently irrelevant pupils who attended the same school.

No you haven't, all separate schools

I was asking for the names of the teachers/staff.
The charges that were brought against them.
The verdicts of the trials etc.

You know... The details.

Cool, you know where google is


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 5:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Thing is jive, you've clearly made up your mind that toffs/the government/etc are bad and that there is a sinister plot (sorry, control mechanism or whatever sinister bond-type name you want to give it) going on. On that basis, anything that matches that view is apparently proof and anything that doesn't is a falsehood.

I think most people on here are coming from a more logical position that given the general incompetence of people it's actually quite hard to fully cover things up and increasingly so in these days of the internet.

Despite this, there's no facts to actually back up what you're saying (saying 'google it' is not providing proof and neither are hits on google from similar conspiracy theorists) so it seems highly likely that that's because it isn't out there - bad things unquestionably happened in the past and no doubt still go on but they're likely isolated groups of nasty people doing nasty things rather than this exciting global conspiracy that would be far more interesting especially if you were one of the special few who really understood the true nature of the world.


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 5:53 pm
Posts: 35270
Full Member
 

so let me get this straight, this is your theory:

A child (lets call him David Cameron) goes to a public school and is abused (because it is generally well known that what goes on there) rather than destroy his world, he goes onto to Oxford to study PPE, all the time saying nothing about his abuse and turning a blind eye to the routine abuse he now knows (presumably) that goes on all around him.

Other politians are then groomed to have sex with children at looked after chidren's homes, so that they can be blackmailed by the catholic church, the masons, Military Intelligence and John Humphries to toe the establishment line.

is that about it?

dammit, missed out the Royals...where do they fit in?


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 5:54 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

The backgrounds of the vast majority of the names I have which I can't currently mention for legal reasons.

Indeed the laws on libel in this country are rather robust best to keep hinting and not saying.

Clearly certain professions, ones with access, attract paedos/sex abusers.
No one would be surprised. this facts is , as per, miles away from proving your hair brained BS


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 5:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They're the lizards that really control DC and all the other abused politicians.

Hold on, does that mean I have to feel sorry for politicians?


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 5:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No you haven't, all separate schools

The same school as the alleged abuser you muppet 🙄

Cool, you know where google is

Can I have a judges ruling please.

Does that count as "do your own research" for the purposes of Bullshit Bingo ?

If you know the details of all these "links" why not just tell me them ?

Or is it just something you were fed by someone else and believed blindly maybe.

It may be true, it may not be true.

If you are so convinced your "links" are accurate, why not just supply the Names, Dates, Charges, Sentences etc and have done with it.


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 5:56 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

Cool, you know where google is

Bastard Neil just beat* me to a line **

* no not in that way
** is not a drugs reference


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 5:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If you are so convinced your "links" are accurate, why not just supply the Names, Dates, Charges, Sentences etc and have done with it.

I have to be honest neal, you come across as a nasty little powertripper; if you were genuinely interested, you'd take the time and see everything I've mentioned is correct.

Tell you what, as an act of faith, do the googling; it's fairly evident I've put the work in... unless your googling proves me wrong; but it won't.


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 6:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As examples, staff at the schools of Nick Clegg, Boris Johnson, George Osborne, Tony Blair have all been linked to sexual abuse, but it is generally known that boarding schools are often rife with abuse.

"Staff"* at one of my old schools were found to be inappropriately interested in their pupils. Who knew the comprehensive school system of Cumbria was a part of the NWO.

*one teacher who was fired shortly after and ended up drinking himself to death


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 6:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 6:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Never a true word spoken 66 deg... 😉


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 6:03 pm
Posts: 35270
Full Member
 

[i]I have to be honest neal, you come across as a nasty little powertripper; if you were genuinely interested, you'd take the time and see everything I've mentioned is correct.[/i]

hang on...a what now?

all he's doing is asking questions from some-one (you) who can presumably much faster than him, already provide the proof...because you know, you have all the google links already done..Throw 'em up, lets see what you've got?


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 6:05 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Who knew the comprehensive school system of Cumbria was a part of the NWO.

Well, quite.

Still, let's keep on harping away at those nasty toffs in their boarding schools, as that's the only place where "it's widely known" that abuse occurs.


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 6:07 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

[b]I have to be honest [/b]*neal, you come across as a nasty little powertripper;

Is this your response to anyone who asks you to substantiate your claims?

FFS you wont even really say what it is you have proof of or who it relates to.

Asking for clarity, in this scenario, is hardly nasty or powertripping.

* any chance you could about the questions/claims etc as you seem to only be able to be honest when you insult folk


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 6:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have to be honest neal, you come across as a nasty little powertripper;

Ok, In the spirit of honesty, you come a cross as a deluded, self important, fantasist.

For the record, I'm fully aware I have no power, and it doesn't really bother me. I'm perfectly happy without it.


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 6:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

who can presumably much faster than him

Thanks for the compliment, but I never said I was a google athlete... in the time it takes you to think up all these replies, you could easily have found all the requested information.

I've been shouldering quite a weighty burden so far... how about you try and prove me wrong; that does seem to be the prevailing trend across the 12 pages of the thread so far...

"Staff"* at one of my old schools were found to be inappropriately interested in their pupils. Who knew the comprehensive school system of Cumbria was a part of the NWO.

May be isolated, may be related, I don't know every specific case, but re boarding schools, please bear in mind:

being in a sufficient position of power to influence national and international politics is far more likely to occur when you do come from that background.

i.e. the type of people the party whips/intelligence services want to coerce.


 
Posted : 04/11/2014 6:13 pm
Page 9 / 18