Forum menu
Graham, there's proof on both sides and do you know what, I don't give a flying for either 'theory' because it affects me Nought, to know for sure you would have to go off planet and I really don't believe anyone has. 😆
it affects me Nought
How so?
If the world is flat then the worlds governments are wasting trillions and trillions of tax dollars keeping up the pretence and silencing the honest scientists or defectors.
On a personal level you are getting ripped off every time you get on a plane, because they have to waste fuel and time taking long circular flights when they could just go straight at the amazing high speeds they are [i]really[/i] capable of.
And of course They are stopping you from having your anti-gravity board.
I really don't believe anyone has
And that's a good example of the problem of proof. There are lots of pictures of a round earth from space. Tim Peake posts his own every day on Facebook and Flickr. But they will be rejected out of hand by Flat Earthers. I'm pretty sure you could fly those people to the moon and they'd still tell you they were on a sound stage in Hollywood.
Well, you can't argue with science like that.
The Guardian have also picked up the BoB story and it is trending nicely, to the consternation of its readers:
http://www.theguardian.com/music/2016/jan/25/bob-rapper-flat-earth-twitter
😆
You don't have to go off planet to prove the earth is round! you just need two decent sized wells a known distance apart in a convenient location. You or rather Eratosthenes can also use the same method to accurately calculate the size of the planet. FFS most doubters of science prove little but their own absence of knowledge.
You could argue gravity keeps it in place but they don't believe in gravity
Take a pendulum and a mountain you can easily calculate the mass of (Schiehallion would probably be a good bet!!). Not only can you demonstrate the existence of gravity, you can measure it.
There are lots of pictures of a round earth from space. Tim Peake posts his own every day on Facebook and Flickr.
all the cameras allowed on these space craft have been fitted with convexo-concave lenses, which is why the earth appears curved. Also the glass in the windows, and Tim's space suit helmet, so poor Tim is none the wiser and doesn't notice that the earth is really flat.
what a bunch of idiots a) spent time creating it b) believing it.Makes you think
It would just tie into the fantasy of lizard people and freemason's being around since humanity started (which obviously started in the Garden of Eden as the world is only 6000 years old or whatever date the [s]thickies[/s]creationists are putting about now).
Pythagoras was born 570BC in Greece, the first Freemason Grand Lodge was in the early 18th Century....
Edit - now the best 'history' of lizard people etc... is from the Hyborian Age stories by a certain R.E.Howard about a certain Mr Conan of Cimmeria you'd be better off reading them.
I always find it hard to reconcile The Freemasons: The shady cultlike group whose pallid hand holds the rudder of global politics with The Freemasons: The fat middle aged gits who nick all the parking spaces outside our house on a thursday night.
I've actually been in a couple of masonic lodges (as a guest).
As far as I could see they were just a cheap bar full of fat middle-aged gits talking endlessly about football.
I assume that the rooms, where they run the sky projectors and plot world domination with the lizard people, are only open to paying members.
all the cameras allowed on these space craft have been fitted with convexo-concave lenses,
You're not going deep enough - those spacecraft don't exist you see. Space itself doesn't exist. There is no way to get past the [url= https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firmament ]Firmament[/url], otherwise you'd let all the water in.
Also the earth is hollow and the moon is giant spacecraft full of aliens 😉
Yeah there are some that claim we [i]actually[/i] live on the INSIDE of the globe earth, standing on the crust and looking up at the universe in the centre.
Because, yeah, that makes much more sense... 😯
Predictably the FE'ers have shown up in The Guardian comments and have IMPORTANT questions to ask. e.g.
Yucatan2001
ask yourself the Most obvious question, WHY? doesnt ANY non computer generated images exist of the Earth from Space. The "Blue Marble"was done in 1972, and has been used as the basis for every Ïmage" we see of space. 16000 Satellites in space......NOT one REAL image has ever been released, every single one is a cgi composite .....No real image from Space EXISTS...simply Computer generated images to keep the ******* flowing. Regarding Neil De Grasse Tyson....The mans a 33 degree mason, See curvature from your Airplane window?....Go read about Barrel Distortion & the effect curved windows have on your eyesight.. we have is to rely on Nasa for any evidence..( well pop yourslef off & go find out about who the Nazi scientist was, the SAME man who Blew up half of London with the V2 rockets killing over 100,000 people in London alone .....Guess where He ended up after WW2....Werner Von Braun WAS the leader of Nasa. Operation paperclip. - I suppose Wiki prints lies too?>...... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip
Excellent stuff.
The Earth is flat because Masons and Nazis.
You can't fault his logic.
Everyone's favourite "[url=
]Black Science Man[/url]", Neil deGrasse Tyson is heroically trying to instil some sense via twitter, but he is just getting swamped by more flat earthers.
https://twitter.com/neiltyson/with_replies
Also, turns out [url= http://gawker.com/why-the-earth-is-flat-straight-from-the-mouth-of-a-ver-1754933801 ]BoB also believes in Celebrity Cloning Centres[/url], which was a new one on me.
Prince Harry poor lad must be Hewitt's son cause he's a dead spit for sure.
Except for the inconvenient fact that the dates of Diana's banging Hewitt and Harry's conception don't come close to matching up.
Trying to argue with FEers is like trying to teach a pig to dance; it just wastes your time and annoys the pig.
There's a simple way of showing how the world is curved, just sail a boat towards land with high structures, where you can see the the objects gradually rising above the horizon as you get closer; of course, the likes of yukatan2001 will argue against any form of evidence that contradicts their obsession.
Things NOT disappearing below the horizon when they should do is one of the key bits of evidence that Flat Earthers use. Essentially variations on experiments discussed here:
https://wiki.tfes.org/Experimental_Evidence
Eh....for those of us in the cheap seats......why would it matter if the earth was flat??
why would it matter if the earth was flat??
See my answer to Lawmanx above.
If the Earth is really flat then the global conspiracy to hide it is costing trillions upon trillions and keeping lots of clever technology from our hands.
Have a look through YouTube crankboy, there are plenty of flat earth videos explaining why Eratosthenes is wrong and pointing out that all these clever geometry people are masons so they are in on it:
I have square and compass, you are being watched.
Having a mooch around the flat earth forums is quite enlightening.
If the Earth is a Sphere, and about 40000 kilometers in diameter, that's 400 000 000 meters, and NASA has taken photographs from thousands of kilometers up in outer space, than how are we able to see features, like say forests on planet earth, when at best, trees are only 100 meters tall?
Uh huh.
It seems that most well presented criticisms are refuted with mirrors, aether, domes, or masons did it.
Go read about Barrel Distortion & the effect curved windows have on your eyesight..
Has he noticed that straight lines on the ground stay straight when he looks through his window but become curved when in the air? Or that the wing is bent at a strange angle? In fact, why am I bothering?
why would it matter if the earth was flat??
See my answer to Lawmanx above.
If the Earth is really flat then the global conspiracy to hide it is costing trillions upon trillions and keeping lots of clever technology from our hands.
Graham, you can't even get my name right so why would I ever listen to an 'Expert' like you? 😆
I don't claim to be an expert Lawnmansex.
Graham, there's proof on both sides and do you know what, I don't give a flying for either 'theory' because it affects me Nought, to know for sure you would have to go off planet and I really don't believe anyone has.
Well, hang on a minute - them blokes and ladies in big fiery rocket things, where did they go when someone lit the fuse? Because many, many people who had no vested interest or ulterior motive saw the magic light arc up into the sky.
If the world is flat then the worlds governments are wasting trillions and trillions of tax dollars keeping up the pretence and silencing the honest scientists or defectors.
On a personal level you are getting ripped off every time you get on a plane, because they have to waste fuel and time taking long circular flights when they could just go straight at the amazing high speeds they are really capable of.
And of course They are stopping you from having your anti-gravity board.
For me this nails it, you can forget your science, and your evidence just the fact that it would require such a global level conspiracy with everyone kept in line that it would make the plot of any bond film seem entirely plausible.
The simple bit of if you happen to believe and have the cash take a film crew and head over to the edge.
Well, hang on a minute - them blokes and ladies in big fiery rocket things, where did they go when someone lit the fuse? Because many, many people who had no vested interest or ulterior motive saw the magic light arc up into the sky.
Umm, there was no-one in the rocket, obviously. Just like there was no-one in the moon rockets that the Russians et al tracked. They just landed an empty moon lander on the moon so that they could then cut to a studio for the 'exterior' shots and then remotely triggered the lander back to the orbiting part and back to Earth. They must have done that otherwise the Russians would have been able to mock the Americans. Unless the Russians were in on the plot????
I'm getting the hang of this now. Everyone knew the moon landings were fake apart from me and my friends.
😆
many, many people who had no vested interest or ulterior motive saw the magic light arc up into the sky
Ahhhh yes.. but it [i]was[/i] an arc, wasn't it?
[img]
[/img]
[url= http://spaceflightnow.com/2015/03/13/recap-story-atlas-5-rocket-launches-nasa-satellite-quartet/ ](Pic: spaceflightnow.com)[/url]
So [i]clearly[/i] that means it is coming right back down again, a few hundred miles away, without anyone noticing, somehow.
[i]"Common sense"[/i] tells us that a rocket should go straight up, not in an arc.
🙄
So. If the earth is flat, is the moon a sphere or just another flat disc?
I know this might be flat earth 101, but I'm not going to go and read any "evidence", I just need someone whose an expert to tell me.
(I'm not expert but) As I understand it they get a bit confused over the details.
Some say it is a sphere but (like the sun) it is WAAAY closer than the NASAtanists say.
Others say it is a disc or simply a projection/hologram like the one they use for the "space station".
I, for one, don't believe that this flat earth consipiracy exists, but is just a fabrication by the mainstream media to make all the genuine conspiracies seem more ridiculous by association.
A bit like the fact that Trump is a left-wing plant to undermine the Republicans.
GrahamS - Member
I don't claim to be an expert Lawnmansex.
that's better! that's what the wife calls me too 😉
just to clarify, I don't know if the earth is flat OR round! after much reading and video watching ive come to the conclusion that there is evidence for both 'Theories' and all I know is .....I Don't really know!
there are many very clever people (like graham) on both sides of the argument but im firmly into the undecided camp until further concrete evidence 🙂
ive come to the conclusion that there is evidence for both 'Theories'
I think you'll find "flat earth" is a hypothesis.
Anyway, Me Sir, Me Sir (clicks fingers). I have a question.
Tides? How do they work in the flat earth model?
im firmly into the undecided camp until further concrete evidence
Out of interest, what evidence would it take to convince you? What would you need to see to be convinced one way or the other?
The plane heading to camp David was most likely shot down imo
TBF I've always thought this. Never gave it enough research/thought as a 'conspiracy' to see how much evidence there was of a passenger revolt (cockpit voice recordings, SMS messages etc) but as soon as that account came out I thought it was a palatable way to cover an uncomfortable truth.
im firmly into the undecided camp until further concrete evidence
Every single branch of the physical sciences is dependant upon a universe where the sun is a spheroid star and the planets orbit it. You need to ask yourself who's more likely to be wrong: every single physicist, geologist, astronomer, evolutionary biologist, astrophysicist and engineer on earth OR a bunch of dickheads?
im firmly into the undecided camp until further concrete evidence
Go find the edge, take a pic and come back.
For irrefutable proof consider the propagation of shockwaves from seismic events. In a flat earth these waves would arrive at different time intervals at different locations on the earth than they do BECAUSE THE EARTH IS A SPHERE.
EDIT: a quick google shows me they've got this covered off, apparently the government did it. Looks like it is a conspiracy after all.
You need to ask yourself who's more likely to be wrong: every single physicist, geologist, astronomer, evolutionary biologist, astrophysicist and engineer on earth OR a bunch of Dickheads
I don't need any further convincing 🙂
mikewsmith - Member
im firmly into the undecided camp until further concrete evidence
Go find the edge, take a pic and come back.
Really? Seriously? Been round the world enough to be convinced. We have proof of a sphere bring back some actual proof of a flat earth, best would be flying under it...
I did some research* and discovered the earth is in fact shaped like a bowl, it's just so all of the water doesn't fall off the edge.
Here, look:
Also the tides work because God is swishing the earth around like brandy in a glass. He may also be smoking a cigar, but I'll have to look into that further.
* I found the first picture on Google images and used that as proof of my theory.
Lawmanx
for some reason I watched (most) of that crap you linked to. Basically an interview with an old bloke who'd been to antarctica followed by some weridos making shit up about that the old blokes trip to antarctica. what precisely was the point you were trying to make?




