Forum menu
Thought we could relive all th eold ones at the same time 😉
Yes I am bored of them
What you have done is take a measure from one location and think that it was occuring globally.WHY oh why ahve you done this? Global warming is quite likely to do the same locally in the UK. When the large quantity of fresh and cold water enters the sea – from melting of ice caps and glaciers due to global warming. This then has a massive effect on the thermohaline circulations- due to salinity and temperature differences. Locally at the UK the North Atlantic Drift no longer arrives - we would cool drastically even though the global temperature was increasing- I knwo imagine that- and by degrees in years /decades – check what countries we are level with and see their temperatures. Once a new thermohaline circulation is established if it follows the same pattern you get rapid rising as the even warmer water returns to increase the temperature again by a number of degrees in a few years and to higher levels than before.
Even if you doubt my explanation you still need to explain why this happening in the past negates anthropogenic climate change. You also need to explain why the vast quantities of harmful gases that are being released are having no effect. I am happy to hear an explanation and your evidence beyond claiming the current models are sh1t.
Does anyone think it is likely that anyone on here is going to come up with something that climate scientists are not aware of? ...where do you think we know about the rapid change from? It is not new knowledge to them.
The debate is far from over!
Indeed, but taking part in that debate is more than just saying "'t isn't".
For example, here is some evidence that global warming actually isn't happening:
[url= http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/08/the-smoking-gun-at-darwin-zero/ ]http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/08/the-smoking-gun-at-darwin-zero/[/url]