I struggle with long sentences
but those *** ** **** * *** should be * in the face.
EDIT - added smilies to avoid the ban hammer... 😕 😉 😐 🙄
EDIT 2 - added '*'s to further avoid ban hammer...
Deliberate attempt to get the thread closed? Probably for the best I suppose.
its a common feature, without the means to think laterally it all goes vertical, and in the end something has to blow--
It is really necessary to resort to insulting people's intelligence, just because they have a different opinion to you ?
Thats a slippery slope.
Next thing you know, you will be making judgments about people you have never met 🙄
(Still none the wiser about my "political" statements I've made on here btw)
Blimey...you lot still arguing about what a Chav is?
Good God.... get lives will ya!
nealglover - this is the [s]troll[/s] person who's side you appear to be on in this argument. Maybe you'd like to have another think about that.
jeeso you really are hard of thinking aren't you?
I'll give it one last go, then I'm off - i've got better things to do than try explaining things to politically correct wind up toys, but thanks for the entertainment this afternoon, [b]almost as funny as watching some burberry clad clown being savaged b a staffie.[/b]
He seems like a real charmer.
rudebwoy - is this you on [url= https://plus.google.com/113085721540719000581/posts ]google[/url] + ?
nealglover - this is the troll person who's side you appear to be on in this argument. Maybe you'd like to have another think about that.
So because my opinion is different to yours, [b]it must be the same as His ? [/b]
Nothing in between black and white with you then eh ? 🙄
So because my opinion is different to yours, it must be the same as His ?Nothing in between black and white with you then eh ?
Where did I say that? I just suggested that coming to the defence of someone who thinks it's funny to watch people being savaged by dogs is a little strange.
And IMO insulting the intelligence of such a person seems like a fairly reasonable thing to do.
I just suggested that coming to the defence of someone who thinks it's funny to watch people being savaged by dogs is a little strange.
If you can point out to me where I "came to his defence", I would be grateful.
Other than saying that insulting someone for having a different opinion seems like a poor way to debate anything.
Interesting that you highlighted a fairly innocuous comment about lacking the means for lateral thinking, while passing no comment on this though......
jeeso you really are hard of thinking aren't you?
I'll give it one last go, then I'm off - i've got better things to do than try explaining things to politically correct wind up toys
I wonder why? TBH when someone comes out with stuff like that it's pretty clear they don't want to 'debate' anything and insulting them seems fairly legitimate.
Fair comment. I didn't spot that to be honest.
If I had, I would have commented on that too (or not bothered with either ?)
Woody, wrong name, not moi
nealglover, for someone as forensic as yourself, wordwise, am suprised you missed that, as for your other comments, i did reply on the sister thread to this.
for someone as forensic as yourself, wordwise
Not sure what that means.
But if you can't resist having another pop even after I've admitted I was wrong, then I don't really care what it means.
sister thread to this.
Not really sure what that means either.
nealglover, your fault, my mistake 😉 page 5 of this thread, halfway down, you did not reply, so .......sister thread--similar discussion,behavioural insights its called....
Thanks, folks, this thread has been most amusing. When I get home to my (ex) council house, I'll have to ask the chavs down the road what they think. If they can actually read it.
Speaking as someone brought up working class, not a whiney, middle-class, Grauniad-reading liberal.
fire away CZ -i'm no ffriggin liberal
Speaking as someone brought up working class, not a whiney, middle-class, Grauniad-reading liberal.
Well if you don't know what a chav is then I don't know who does CountZero, you great big rufty tufty salt-of-the-earth geezer.
Fair comment. I didn't spot that to be honest.If I had, I would have commented on that too (or not bothered with either ?)
Fairy nuff.
Speaking as someone brought up working class, not a whiney, middle-class, Grauniad-reading liberal.
Oh I'm sorry, can you just let me know exactly what your opinions are on this, as with your background/status you seem to be a real authority. I'll just fit in with whatever you say.
Rudebwoy, all I asked was when have made a "political stance"
You claimed that I have, and made a point regarding it in this thread (judged me based on it)
your political stance on a number of issues
I wondered if you could justify that with anything.
NG-- you will have to read what i said on page 2- your stance on this forum- not thread,although on this thread you have been very revealing, but as you wish to go elsewhere, it would not be fair on other people on here to have to suffer the deconstruction of word/phrase that you specialise in-- you do comment on other topics, i do read, i can only form opinions based on what you say-- its a two way street
