Building experts, d...
 

[Closed] Building experts, does this look safe to you?

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

[url= https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1615/25376402043_26cde49ef2_z.jp g" target="_blank">https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1615/25376402043_26cde49ef2_z.jp g"/> [/img][/url]

Lifting a big roof truss horizontally, over my shop - it bounces quite a bit too.


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 11:30 am
Posts: 10520
Full Member
 

Be reet, that.


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 11:31 am
Posts: 3900
Free Member
 

No. Anything other than perfectly smooth lifting and that'll be off.


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 11:31 am
Posts: 43878
Full Member
 

As long as it doesn't fall it'll be perfectly safe


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 11:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

They're driving along with the things held horizontally, then trying to lift them.


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 11:33 am
Posts: 3900
Free Member
 

Is it windy up there?


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 11:34 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Personally, i'd have skewered the forks through the assembly. And i only lift loads over objects i wouldn't mind dropping loads on.


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 11:34 am
Posts: 4136
Full Member
 

moronic, I'd have a word, they should have a crane to lift them. Cost cutting.


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 11:34 am
Posts: 12860
Free Member
 

Pfft I'd get them all on and do it in a oner.


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 11:35 am
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

[i]I'd get them all on and do it in a oner. [/i]

that was my first thought - why not just put it through the apex of the truss and do all 6 at once. Can't be any worse...


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 11:36 am
Posts: 39662
Free Member
 

is it not time to park some of your very long bikes out the back ?


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 11:37 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I presume because they can't drive along with the things held high enough. Middle of an empty site, fine to bugger about - over my shop not so much.


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 11:37 am
Posts: 17313
Free Member
 

That's what we in the trade would refer to as "a wee bit naughty".

Is the truss secured to the forks of the telehandler?

The truss'll be relatively light though and as long as the telehandler has sufficient reach to clear it over the protruding scaffold upright and allow it to be unloaded at high level, nobody'll die. Probably.

Internal standards in construction companies vary wildly. I've worked in places where that picture would get the site manager and everyone else involved sacked on the spot.
I've also worked for companies where the same photo would be greeted with bemused cries of "What?"

HSE would take a dim view I suspect.

The safest way would be to build the entire roof structure on the ground and crane it on in one go. The really dangerous bit is for the guys who're clambering about up there trying to assemble the trusses and board the roof.


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 11:38 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Is the truss secured to the forks of the telehandler?

No. It's resting on the bottom of the truss, and a board they've temporarily rested it on because the prongs aren't long enough to reach the top of the truss.

They don't know how much they weigh, but it took 5 guys to lift one.


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 11:39 am
Posts: 17313
Free Member
 

Is the truss secured to the forks of the telehandler?

No.

In that case....Run.

Run for your life.

Big Bit naughty. Speak to the Site Agent. Tell him you don't want to involve the HSE but also don't want your skull / shop / car / baby robin / childs face / bicycle / etc. stoved in either.


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 11:44 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I told them to stop being so daft, and they're now lifting them vertically which is an improvement.


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 11:46 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

the truss isn't designed to support loads like that.

yes, i know it's only self-weight, but still, i wouldn't be surprised if you could break that truss lifting it like that.


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 11:48 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

That was my point - "they don't weigh much" "so why did it take five of your lads to lift one?"


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 11:49 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Get on the phone to the company and ask to speak to their safety manager stating that they are carryout unsafe lifting practices contrary to LOLER that are endangering passers by and your property. Mention that you have posted photos on-line and will phone the HSE if they do not stop, http://www.hse.gov.uk/contact/contact.htm ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 11:51 am
Posts: 236
Full Member
 

Not only is it the wrong side of the safe they could also damage the trusses lifting them like that. Tight sods are just trying to avoid getting a crane in. I'd ask them to stop.

EDIT Beaten by ahwhiles, buggerit.


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 11:51 am
Posts: 17313
Free Member
 

"they don't weigh much"

It's all relative though innit? Compared to the pallets of bricks that the telehandler is rated to carry to the extent of it's reach that truss is like lifting a feather.


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 11:52 am
Posts: 17313
Free Member
 

@bencooper - is it CCG?


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 11:55 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Not sure, what's CCG?


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 11:58 am
Posts: 17313
Free Member
 

The contractor ? - they use that colour of portacabin.


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 12:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

McLaughlin Construction http://www.mclaughlinconstruction.co.uk/


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 12:05 pm
Posts: 17313
Free Member
 

Don't know anyone there. Might have had a quiet word otherwise.


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 12:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Cheers - I've emailed them anyway.


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 12:13 pm
Posts: 177
Full Member
 

When you can download Approved Codes of Practice for free from the HSE, there really is no excuse for this kind of thing. Link to a free download of Safe Use of Lifting Equipment below:


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 12:46 pm
Posts: 2871
Free Member
 

I'm no expert on scaffolding, but that doesn't have any diagonal bracing................


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 12:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Quick stage scaffold. Its the best ๐Ÿ˜‰
As for the trusses we offload them through the truss either side of the ridge which is perfectly acceptable. They probably weigh 30/40 kg at the most.
As for safety, yup theyre penny pinching. Room to get a decent hiab in there if they didnt want to crane.


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 1:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

They probably weigh 30/40 kg at the most.

Not these ones - the pic probably doesn't show scale well, they're at least 30ft long.


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 1:19 pm
Posts: 293
Free Member
 

How about when the Telehandler topples forward ๐Ÿ˜† the alarm will be beeping like a good one.


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 1:23 pm
Posts: 43878
Full Member
 

Are they done yet?


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 1:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

10m, relatively shallow pitch so rafter isn't that long. Youd be surprised at how little they weigh. Should be a ticket on each one. Go have a peek.


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 1:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That's at least a 13m tele it can piss that lift. However id lift probably 5 at once and have the legs down. Countless hours driving one and actually ticketed unlike some of the stuff I drive ๐Ÿ˜ณ


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 1:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The point is they are lifting over his shop. Suspended load and all that...


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 1:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

It's not the telelifter I was bothered about, it was the truss snapping in half and dropping through my roof. It was bending down several feet at either end.

But they're now promising to do the rest properly tomorrow.


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 2:24 pm
Posts: 968
Free Member
 

Drove up past your shop today, looked like they only had 2 trusses up on the roof! Probably waiting until your not around so they can continue with the tele-handler method.


 
Posted : 24/03/2016 9:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Their insurance should cover any damage/loss of life. 8)


 
Posted : 24/03/2016 10:01 pm
Posts: 930
Full Member
 

Their insurance should cover any damage/loss of life.

possibly if lift was fully planned with all paperwork in place, it doesnt look likely that has happened RUN... ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 24/03/2016 10:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

It was really sweet - they knocked on the door this afternoon to show me the new way they'd worked out to do it safely. Telelifter at the back of the site with supports down, they walk the trusses in then do a straight up lift. Much more sensible.

I think they got a bollocking from the clients - who also happen to be my landlords ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 24/03/2016 10:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You find out what they weigh?


 
Posted : 24/03/2016 10:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Nope.


 
Posted : 24/03/2016 10:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is there a safe weight to be lifting over people?


 
Posted : 25/03/2016 9:00 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

More importantly the truss may well snap if lifted flat like that and when it snaps it will fall off. The gangnail plates will fail.
C


 
Posted : 25/03/2016 9:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

See earlier comment on "how to lift." Lifting as they were is just stupid and I'd suggest they haven't put many roofs on. Much easier to recieve the truss in an upright position to start with as over that length they're a bastard to stand.


 
Posted : 25/03/2016 9:46 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Its trespass as the landowner owns the airspace. Its poor planning and unlikely that they have undertaken a method statement. There should be a written agreement with the landowner being oversailed and evidence that necessary insurances in place. Ask them to stop until this agreed and evidence of insurance demonstrated. If they carry on you could get an injunction if you felt strongly about it.


 
Posted : 25/03/2016 10:38 am
 sv
Posts: 2815
Full Member
 

No support/jack legs down would be my issue - I had problems when a sub contractor was tiling our garage roof. He had asked the main contractor (new build development) site guy to lift the tiles up onto the roof with the tele-handler. Didnt put the legs down and the machine tipped forward and the tiles fell off. That bit wasnt great but then the loose tiles knocked one of the subbies of the roof and he fell to the ground. Ambulance/A&E (think he sustained some back injuries) and eventually a court case. All fought out by the sub contractor and the main site firm, I was next on the hit list (wasnt even at home!)...


 
Posted : 25/03/2016 10:55 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Aye, we're all good now - their new plan doesn't involve lifting over me or anyone else, just a straight lift with the legs down.


 
Posted : 25/03/2016 11:28 am