Forum menu
Bugger - Just misse...
 

[Closed] Bugger - Just missed an opportunity to buy a Tornado F3

Posts: 31
Free Member
Topic starter
 

[url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-northamptonshire-28459093 ]My Fav aircraft of the cold war years[/url]and at 37k seems a bargain, then I guess the engines, avionics etc would have been removed, so it will just be a museum piece or something at your front gate..


 
Posted : 27/07/2014 5:25 pm
Posts: 3394
Full Member
 

With the wings forward I think they would over sail both neighbours, but to be honest I think they would both be happy with that. (I am excluding their wifes...)


 
Posted : 27/07/2014 5:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

good buy if you have problem neighbours. soon stop causing trouble when you park that in the garden and point it at theirs


 
Posted : 27/07/2014 5:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Or you could have had a Harrier,apparently complete in "timewarp" condition for a bit over £100,000 !!


 
Posted : 27/07/2014 5:40 pm
Posts: 1617
Free Member
 

The harrier is almost flight ready apparently but no mention of the tornado. Would be a hell of a bargain if it has all the engines etc although I guess the running costs are in the £1000's per hour so the purchase price will soon be eclipsed by running costs if the new owner does intend to fly it.


 
Posted : 27/07/2014 5:53 pm
Posts: 12910
Free Member
 

The harrier is cool but there are far cooler jets than the tornado.

Jaguars
Lightnings
Viggens
Phantoms


 
Posted : 27/07/2014 6:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Surprised to read it ships with ejector seat intact 🙁 pretty lethal item of equipment.


 
Posted : 27/07/2014 6:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So could any old buffoon buy that and attempt to fly it from his back yard?

*checks bank balance


 
Posted : 27/07/2014 6:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Surprised to read it ships with ejector seat intact pretty lethal item of equipment.

Somehow i think the explosives will have been removed.


 
Posted : 27/07/2014 6:40 pm
Posts: 20628
Full Member
 

The Harrier would be pretty cool for the commute. Fewer problems with parking it than with the Tornado...


 
Posted : 27/07/2014 6:43 pm
Posts: 33919
Full Member
 

[s]Jaguars[/s]
Lightnings
[s]Viggens[/s]
[s]Phantoms[/s]

Sorry to disappoint, but only one on that list comes anywhere close to a Harrier for sheer coolness.
None are capable of VIFFing, for a start!
(To save the Google search, that's Vectoring In Forward Flight; the jet basically jumps upwards unexpectedly when the thrust nozzles are swung downwards).


 
Posted : 27/07/2014 6:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Somehow i think the explosives will have been removed.

So its a seat then?


 
Posted : 27/07/2014 7:22 pm
Posts: 12910
Free Member
 

CountZero thats why i compared them to the tornado not the harrier.


 
Posted : 27/07/2014 7:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If you could rustle up a crane, low loader and a big chunk of bluff/blag you could swipe [url= http://goo.gl/maps/PVMve ]this Tornado[/url] from Shoreham airport.

Apparently it's [url= https://www.flickr.com/photos/emdjt42/8196357555/ ]the 3rd prototype built[/url].


 
Posted : 28/07/2014 6:10 pm
 Kuco
Posts: 7216
Full Member
 

I always preferred the Jaguar.


 
Posted : 28/07/2014 6:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They both look great but that Tornado is beautiful!


 
Posted : 28/07/2014 6:26 pm
Posts: 33919
Full Member
 

Soz, so you did, reading it while doing something else I didn't notice the Tornado on the end.
That's why women are better at multitasking than blokes... 😉


 
Posted : 28/07/2014 6:36 pm
 kcal
Posts: 5450
Full Member
 

My lad would be in heaven if that Harrier ended up anywhere close here; I'll tell him to get sweeping a few chimneys to save up! Does look lovely..

Buccaneers would be for me -- there's one outside our local filling station.. https://www.google.co.uk/maps/uv?hl=en&pb=!1s0x48850bbca05ad877:0xc4e08622ff0c4b67!2m5!2m2!1i80!2i80!3m1!2i100!3m1!7e1!4shttp://www.panoramio.com/photo/64256368!5sbuccaneer+petrol+station+-+Google+Search&sa=X&ei=QovWU8q6NaKn0QWR-IDIAw&ved=0CJgBEKIqMA8


 
Posted : 28/07/2014 6:43 pm
Posts: 7615
Full Member
 

Ialways thought the Tornado was a pretty ungainly fighter. They shoehorned it into a role it wasn't made for. As a low level IDS aircraft it was absolutely supreme. As a fighter it was a bit of an also ran in an age the gave us the F15 and the Su27


 
Posted : 28/07/2014 6:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Somehow i think the explosives will have been removed

In the UK, civilian operators can legally own ejection seats.

In fact, without a live seat it will be very hard to get a certificate of airworthiness on that harrier.


 
Posted : 28/07/2014 6:47 pm
Posts: 1617
Free Member
 

Jaguar is a lot prettier than the Tornado. Always thought the fuselage around the cockpit on the Tornado was too lardy. F14 and F111 (much bigger) look better if comparing swing-wing type.

Ps it states the ejector seat is functional.


 
Posted : 28/07/2014 6:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The jag is a proper single seat pilots aircraft as well, no fly by wire if I remember correctly.


 
Posted : 28/07/2014 6:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Having done contract work for martin baker and ronaldsway I wouldn't want to rely on one of those seats 😯


 
Posted : 28/07/2014 9:42 pm
Posts: 569
Full Member
 

Sorry to disappoint, but only one on that list comes anywhere close to a Harrier for sheer coolness.
None are capable of VIFFing, for a start!
(To save the Google search, that's Vectoring In Forward Flight; the jet basically jumps upwards unexpectedly when the thrust nozzles are swung downwards).

VIFFing was a big propaganda thing in the papers during the Falklands war. It was never seriously considered as a viable tactic.


 
Posted : 29/07/2014 12:35 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Talked to an ex squadron leader friend of mine once (not Harriers), he said that Harriers were unofficially capable of viffing but it's a last ditch maneuver that would bleed to much energy to be realistically useful.


 
Posted : 29/07/2014 12:56 am