Forum menu
Ban the 'selfi...
 

[Closed] Ban the 'selfie stick'

Posts: 8102
Free Member
 

I consider myself a restrained and quiet person, but I am beginning to feel that it's perfectly reasonable to beat someone to death with their own GoPro-on-a-selfie-stick.


 
Posted : 13/01/2015 6:54 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Some people up there are real killjoys who don't get the purpose of a lighthearted thread... I'm not sure anyone really spends much time caring about frivolities such as being discussed, it's just banter dorks! 😉

Now, back to figuring which corporal punishments are worthy of people who use these vile objects. I do like "beat to death with their own gopro on a stick"


 
Posted : 13/01/2015 7:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Had one for the go pro for ages. Just adds another shot. Plus my mrs is shit at photography, to the point I'm better taking a random guess as to where we are in the shot and doing it myself!


 
Posted : 13/01/2015 7:13 pm
Posts: 33973
Full Member
 

Presumably you can get them for compacts (so, with a tripod mount), rather than just something to clamp a phone into??
Wouldn't it be easier to stick the camera on a tripod and use the timer function?
Or am I being too simplistic?

There are many public places that ban the use of tripods.
What perplexes me is why this is suddenly a new thing. They've been around for ever, only they were called monopods.

Not the same thing, Cougar; a monopod is just a telescopic pole to mount a camera on to aid stability while taking photos, where a tripod may be impractical/banned.
You couldn't mount a phone on a monopod and take selfies, not without some sort of mounting on the top.
A monopod doesn't have a facility for triggering the shutter, a selfie stick/pole does.


 
Posted : 13/01/2015 7:18 pm
Posts: 5402
Full Member
 

Why do people get so wound up about things that don't affect them?

I have a selfie stick, I took it on our last holiday and combined with my wee pretend GoPro I mate a video. It's only a couple of minutes long and you know what? We actually enjoy watching it every now and then, reminds us of a happy time.


 
Posted : 13/01/2015 7:51 pm
Posts: 173
Free Member
 

Globalti where you in morzine?

Just a hunch...


 
Posted : 13/01/2015 8:42 pm
Posts: 11386
Free Member
 

Feel sorry for those with such short arms


 
Posted : 13/01/2015 8:44 pm
 hels
Posts: 971
Free Member
 

As always, Charlie Brooker has it spot on:

"Last year brought widespread acceptance of the “selfie stick” – a stick you clamp your smartphone into so you can take a narcissistic self-portrait at a slightly greater distance than your feeble human arms will allow. What’s odd about the selfie stick is that while it might faintly improve the photo you’ll post on Facebook, it definitely makes you seem like a shallow, awful clown to any bystanders in the humdrum physical space you’re posing in. And it’s unnecessary anyway, because if you’re the sort of person who takes so many self-portraits you’ll consider spending money on a selfie stick, it’s a cast-iron certainty that absolutely no one needs or wants to see another photograph of you ever again. Until the invention of the Selfpreciator, that is. The Selfpreciator is a quasi-sentient head-shaped device with one giant eye and a fixed grin, programmed to gaze approvingly at every self-portrait you upload while issuing appreciative murmurs and tweeting encouraging emojis your way. It’s even got its own selfie stick, so it can take photographs of itself admiring photographs of you, then email them to you, so you can ignore them while adjusting your selfie stick."

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jan/05/selfie-stick-really-useful-inventions-ces-charlie-brooker


 
Posted : 13/01/2015 8:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bimbler - Member
Apparently a 90 year old "invention"

Is he not just pressing the button with a broom handle because there was no timer on his camera ?


 
Posted : 13/01/2015 9:02 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

Feel sorry for those with such short arms

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 13/01/2015 9:29 pm
Posts: 12998
Free Member
 

I got everyone in my family a selfie stick.

Handy for when you have a 6month old son/grandson/nephew strapped to your chest!


 
Posted : 13/01/2015 9:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Serious question, but how does a selfish stick actually take a photo on a camera phone? On my phone you have to touch the screen....


 
Posted : 13/01/2015 9:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bluetooth


 
Posted : 13/01/2015 10:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Serious question, but how does a selfish stick actually take a photo on a camera phone? On my phone you have to touch the screen....

Some of them have a Bluetooth trigger built in, so you pair that to the phone, then press the button to take a photo. Others have a trigger with a cable, which plugs into the headphone socket.
Some don't have any trigger, so you have to use the self-timer.
Or you could use a voice activated shutter, so it takes a photo when you shout at it...


 
Posted : 13/01/2015 10:15 pm
Posts: 0
 

I've never seen one, only heard of them about a week before christmas, I'm happy not to put them into room 101 or give a hedgehogs nostril about them. As for pictures of posing and pouting on facebook, surely that's like winning scrump lotto whilst having a casual look around facebook 😉


 
Posted : 13/01/2015 10:18 pm
Posts: 5182
Free Member
 

So it's still ok to ask a stranger to take the photo for you?

Only if they aren't underweight. And only if they have two legs.


 
Posted : 13/01/2015 10:24 pm
Posts: 9232
Full Member
 


Don't be such a bunch of saddos.

You do realise which forum you've posted this on don't you?


 
Posted : 13/01/2015 10:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ahh I see. Guess I'm no longer down with the kids when it comes to tech & gadgets anymore 🙁


 
Posted : 13/01/2015 11:01 pm
Posts: 1083
Full Member
 

I disagree. If it were not for these items, we would be raising a whole generation of teenage girls who were shit at impersonating ducks.


 
Posted : 13/01/2015 11:03 pm
 DrJ
Posts: 14010
Full Member
 

Sound of point being missed. The idea of the selfie stick is to take pictures that include not just you but also someone with you plus the background. If it was just a case of narcissism you could use the two nature-supplied selfie sticks you already have.


 
Posted : 13/01/2015 11:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I had a towny weekend in London over Xmas. Every European and their dog had one on the south bank. I got walloped by one and the missus took a few hits too 🙁 im up for the ban!


 
Posted : 13/01/2015 11:31 pm
Posts: 18209
Full Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 15/01/2015 8:31 am
Posts: 990
Free Member
 

I find pics that I'm not in a bit boring so I can understand why you'd get one. On the other hand it encourages duckface and you look like a complete twonk using it so I'd never get one myself!


 
Posted : 15/01/2015 9:50 am
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

Give it a decade until everyone is using [url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-30726865 ]autonomous selfie drones[/url] and then you'll wonder why you were so bothered about a stick.


 
Posted : 15/01/2015 11:09 am
 D0NK
Posts: 10677
Full Member
 

Feel sorry for those with such short arms
+1 if you need a stick, mirror, front facing cam or any other gubbins to take a pic of yourself (and maybe 1 or two other people) then hand in your [s]camera[/s] image collection device


 
Posted : 15/01/2015 11:43 am
Posts: 66112
Full Member
 

legend - Member

So it's still ok to ask a stranger to take the photo for you?

Yup but there's a good chance you'll get some total fanny who can't work a modern camera, like me. "And then I touch the screen to take the picture? What wytchcrafte be thys?"


 
Posted : 15/01/2015 11:48 am
Posts: 24440
Full Member
 

arrogant photo

A what now?


 
Posted : 15/01/2015 2:48 pm
Page 2 / 2