I'll get the apology out the way right up front, and say this is a sort of Brexit related thread.
My question is this: As unscientific and poorly formed as the question might be, do you think the mood of the people has changed if you compare last summer with this summer?
I appreciate I'm in a London bubble, and it's summer that makes London tolerable to me, because it does come alive and have a certain joie de vivre. My sense is that the joie has been more or less completely absent this year. I'm trying to establish if that's cos I'm a remoaner, or if anyone else has noticed a broadly similar phenomenon. And if they have, is it safe to assume we can blame Brexit for all our woes?
is it safe to assume we can blame Brexit for all our woes?
Doesn't matter; it'll get the blame anyway.
is it safe to assume we can blame Brexit for all our woes?
Its not brexit per’se, more this current bunch of retards we have in government that have frankly split this country in half and continue to belittle everyone, and treat its citizens like shit.
That plus every news story is blasted with the same bloody Brexit topic and Political bullshit bingo.
Its enough to make everyone repressed and commit suicide... which is probably what they all want us to do.
My woes have sod-all to do with Brexit. I'm in the 'just get the ruddy thing sorted either way' camp.
there are 50+ OAPs shouting #stopthecoup once a week outside Milton Keynes train station every wednesday at the momemnt
these are not normal times
but more generally weve had 10 years of grinding austerity, its taking a toll
There has been very little positive progression in most peoples lives since the 2098 crash, not just in the UK but across the world. Corporations have used it as an excuse to take an extra pound of flesh from everyone's lives. Brexit, trump etc are both partial causes and symptoms of a general feeling of misery.
Even entertainment is feeding the cycle, it feels that by far the majority of television and movies are bleak, with conspiracies and "dark forces working in the background" themes.
It’s created a really horrible division that I can’t see going away, for many years. The rational of thinking don’t care either way, as long as it’s not to people’s detriment, but the rest are lunatics on both sides.
I really don’t think the politicians are to blame either; it’s our extreme stances, that have to be seen to accommodated for, that’s the problem.
But outside of either of those polarised bubbles, yes, the rest of us are lacking any joy because we’re trapped in a fact-deprived, emotionally-driven, blind leap of faith.
In general most people in my circle of contact are tired and miserable with a general apathy toward things.
Outside of that the standard of manners, trust and interaction seems to have dropped.
Just to cheer everyone up that "just wants it sorted"....remember, the leaving of the EU is the "easy" part of the negotiations.
We won't have sorted trading arrangements with the rest of the world for perhaps a decade?
Also.... If we leave the EU under acrimonious terms, ie crashing out and not paying the divorce bill... the EU are going to be a little bit hard line with us in regard to trade terms.😉 Then we also have the joy of getting a deal with Trump with bugger all leverage on our side.
Either way, Brexit will be in the news for many years to come, it's now defining what and who we are.
It's a battle for the very soul of this country
Embrace it or fight it or ignore it but it's not going away any time soon.
since the 2098 crash
Have I been in a coma?
Can I just check... who's the president?
Biff Tannen.
I'm in a Bristol/London double bubble. Both have a seething anger to them due to the political climate. London feels largely hopeless, Bristol seems to be finding some energy and resilience, perhaps because it's not full of bankers and has a few hippies?
Doesn’t matter; it’ll get the blame anyway.
Brexit itself won't get the blame, the EU will.
If you asked a random 100 people why thier joie de vivre was low, you would get 100 different answers. I can't imagine any of them would be Brexit.
Not even the politicians look all that glum. And the press is revelling in it.
I’m off to a wedding tonight, I’ll ask those there if Brexit is making them feel “low”
I doubt you’ll be surprised at the answer.
We are all poorer because of Brexit, and we’re only just beginning with it… cost of living changes hit people’s mood badly… arguably more so in the big cities.
I can’t imagine any of them would be Brexit.
Alpin wasn't in your sample then.
It all seems business as usual to me
I prefer the "free hugs" lot outside Milton Keynes station on a Friday morning. They never want to hug the sweaty cyclist for some reason.
The recession is coming.
As Winston Churchill said, “ Let people vote for things, then give it to them hard”.
Some of the Loons I know are gagging for the No Deal. They’ll find out when Bozza kills their pensions.
We are all poorer because of Brexit, and we’re only just beginning with it…
If people felt wealthy pre brexit , we would have remained by a huge margin. But this was not the case, what many remainers dont seem to understand is that many people that voted leave had very little to loose.
I fully understand. When you are already struggling to make ends meet, any increase in the cost of living hits your mood ****ing hard.
Some of the Loons I know are gagging for the No Deal.
And its that kind of speak that causes division. Them ( the thickos that didnt know what they were voting for) and me ( the smart one).
If people felt wealthy pre brexit , we would have remained by a huge margin. But this was not the case, what many remainers dont seem to understand is that many people that voted leave had very little to loose.
not to start an argument, whilst I agree with the sentiment. The demographics don't fully back it. But however bad most people think they have it in the UK they have a lot to lose. How big are the slums in the UK? How many people make a living by combing tips for scrap.
The issue IN MY EXPERIENCE is people thinking the world owes them something because they are English.
university educated middle class, middle aged professional people that have benefited from cheap EU labour
Nah, but I've been cheap EU labour on occasion. And I reckon more people on here are cheap labour than fat cats. The main demographic is people rushing around working their butts off to keep all the balls in the air who are two missed pay cheques away from financial chaos.
Them ( the thickos that didnt know what they were voting for) and me ( the smart one).
Perhaps the people he knows, who want No Deal, are “loons”. There are also people far smarter, and far better positioned, than any of us looking to make a killing during and after No Deal. Some people pushing for No Deal are the smartest of the smart. The ones he knows might just be “loons”. Do you know them?
If people felt wealthy pre brexit , we would have remained by a huge margin. But this was not the case, what many remainers dont seem to understand is that many people that voted leave had very little to loose.
The EU was just the fall guy for decades of decline in many parts of the UK. Whether Tory (the worst obvs, or Labour they were both complicit) a good many parts of the country have been forgotten about since the 70's.
Also....The trouble is, they (many Leavers) have got a lot to lose.
Unless they are homeless and begging, they have an awful lot. Add to that their and their families health, or rather health care and it won't be pretty for even those that think it can't get worse.
The real tragedy is that many of the town's and communities that voted for Brexit will get hit by far the hardest.
I'll be doing my best to look after my small family and the others I care about but I'm a carer for my mother and I know we are likely targets when more scapegoats are needed. Not to mention our reliance on the NHS, the other target that will be hit/privatised.
In truth I'm worried sick but I'm also powerless other than the placebo of tactically voting at any GE or referendum to come up.
I'm out of the thread now as it's only going to get closed as we have The Thread for this.
I don't know many Brits in real life. Of those the majority are remainers, the leavers are old and poorly educated with one exception who has more money than he knows what to do with.
I chatted with a couple of Brits today on the way up the Tourmalet. They were in very good spirits (as you'd hope being on a cycling holiday on great roads in perfect weather) and the 'b'-word wasn't used at all.
Low income groups will be disproportionately affected by any price rises in food and fuel. (HMT)
Two wrongs don't make a right. We had no mandate to get into the EU in the first place. We never voted for it. We never got the opportunity to do so. Cowardly politicians skulked behind our backs and signed us upto it without consolation, consent or even letting us know. It's irrelevant if the EU is fundamentally a good or bad thing for us. That ship sailed a long time ago. The fact is big chunks of the public feel aggrieved that we were not consulted before the politicians signed us up so that mistrust in the political elite has just laid dormant and festered in the absence of open debate and expression of opinions. That tends to happen when you deny vast swathes of the public the right to express their views, opinions and cast a vote and have some element of control in their lives. So no surprise when Pandoras box was opened all hell broke loose.
The irony is that if politicians at the time had been transparent and put things to the public and laid out the case in a sensible and coherent manner before signing us upto treaties that ceded away our sovereignty and independence, the chances are we would have gone along with it and all this might have been avoided and we'd be a happy, united pro European public...or alternatively a happy united independent UK. Who'd have thunk it that freedom, independence and sovereignty were concepts that the British public valued?
But certainly where I live in the midlands, peoples resolve and opinions have hardened and what surprises me is how many young people are in favour of just getting out by whatever means. A combination of just being sick and tired of it all and any result will be better than the nightmare we're currently in with all the scheming and manipulation by the political elite on all sides, primarily for their own ends and political ambitions, and not in the interests of the public, that any other outcome is better than the current situation.
So much to say to that wobbli.... But I'm just not going to bother.
Second and final flounce.👍
Parliamentary democracy, Wobbliscott. Are you still leaning towards leave yourself?.
any result will be better than the nightmare we’re currently in with all the scheming and manipulation by the political elite on all sides
Here we go again… the inability to see that things can get worse… how do your see the “scheming and manipulation” ending… we have have a government who are the government because they were the best, and hired the best, at “scheming and manipulation”. Why are they going to do less of it from here on in?
I have no idea anymore to be honest. I voted remain but if a second vote came around I have no idea what I'd vote ...probably leave just in a strange experiment to see what would actually happen. But one thing I'm coming to the conclusion of is that the chaos we're seeing today has not cropped up out of the blue..it has to be something that is far more deeply rooted in our society that passed me by though these years, but now forced to take take notice of and suddenly form an opinion on trying to play catch up on 40 years worth of opaque political history. Not being in London and not surrounded by remainers and probably exposed to a more balanced view of opinions than Londoners, I can't make sense of the argument on either side, so where do you go from there? It's bollox, lies and deceit on both sides.
Parliamentary democracy, Wobbliscott. Are you still leaning towards leave yourself?.
Not sure what we're witnessing is Parliamentary democracy. Ultimately Parliament should be enacting the will of the people. Parliament...or the members of, had their chance to influence public opinion before the votes were cast...once the votes were cast their job then becomes to execute the will of the people.
Ultimately Parliament should be enacting the will of the people.
Do you honestly believe that more people support Johnson’s Brexit current policies than do not? Or are you talking about the vote 3 years ago, where Johnson was proposing entirely different Brexit polices? Parliament does not have to fall behind one person’s interpretation of “the will of the people” (the PM’s), or indeed their idea of what is good for the country, unless he can convince enough MPs that he is correct.
No, parliament should be acting in the best interests of the people even if it's not their will. That's the whole point, you delegate responsibility to MPs, it's representative democracy not direct democracy. With direct democracy you get all sorts of strange things happening such as people voting to persecute minorities, which is why many people voted leave.
No, parliament should be acting in the best interests of the people even if it’s not their will. That’s the whole point, you delegate responsibility to MPs
Yes, but the parliament takes their delegation form the public in trust that they will enact the will of the people following their instruction from the result of elections. MP's are there to enact the will of the people...not ignore it or 'interpret' it.
MP’s are there to enact the will of the people
They really aren't. Churchill had something to say on this, I'll try and find it.
Edit to add: "he is the representative but not the delegate"
'The first duty of a member of Parliament is to do what he thinks in his faithful and disinterested judgement is right and necessary for the honour and safety of Great Britain. His second duty is to his constituents, of whom he is the representative but not the delegate. Burke's famous declaration on this subject is well known. It is only in the third place that his duty to party organization or programme takes rank. All these three loyalties should be observed, but there in no doubt of the order in which they stand under any healthy manifestation of democracy.' Sir Winston Churchill on the Duties of a Member of Parliament.[4]
and the ‘b’-word wasn’t used at all.
Yeah everyone i know avoids it and groans when it's mentioned, me included
MP’s are there to enact the will of the people…not ignore it or ‘interpret’ it.
I ask again. Do you think that more people support Johnson’s Brexit policy than do not? What is the “will of the people” as regards Johnson’s Brexit policy?
Two wrongs don’t make a right. We had no mandate to get into the EU in the first place. We never voted for it. We never got the opportunity to do so. Cowardly politicians skulked behind our backs and signed us upto it without consolation, consent or even letting us know.
Oh FFS. There was a referendum back in the day that some Leavers still bleat on about... But by your logic every single trade deal the govt eventually manages to sign will need to be put to the people to vote on - I don't see that ending well.
es, but the parliament takes their delegation form the public in trust that they will enact the will of the people following their instruction from the result of elections. MP’s are there to enact the will of the people…not ignore it or ‘interpret’ it.
I call BS. That might be vaguely true in a direct democracy, but we don't live in one of those - we live in a representative democracy where we elect people to take complex decisions on our behalf (as ludicrous as that seems with our current crop of politicians).
They really aren’t. Churchill had something to say on this, I’ll try and find it.
So ****ing what if churchill said it !!
How did you vote, cheekyboy?
So, bear with me here, if an MP is elected on a remain manifesto, in a constituency that voted overwhelmingly to remain in the EU, is it their duty to pursue a remain outcome in parliament or is it to enact “the will of the people”?
ask again. Do you think that more people support Johnson’s Brexit policy than do not?
I'm not sure what his policy is. He's yet to go to Brussels and negotiate a new deal...or not. I'll reserve judgement until then. The question is that even if BJ is successful in getting the mythical cake and eat it deal, will parliament vote for it? or vote it down? That would be telling of their true intentions...and I suspect their greatest fear. I'm no BJ fan outside of celebrity and comedy even if its unintentional, but at least he's trying to bring things to a head and move on from the current stalemate.
Not sure if the Churchill quote is his opinion or if he's quoting the constitution or something, but as a wartime leader he was the man...thank god he was around, but as a peacetime PM and politician he was a failure, the Boris Johnson of his time, so no need to heed his opinion over anyone else's.
Oh FFS. There was a referendum back in the day that some Leavers still bleat on about… But by your logic every single trade deal the govt eventually manages to sign will need to be put to the people to vote on – I don’t see that ending well.
The original referendum was effectively about a trade deal...that's all, but the EU is so much more and there is a reason politicians of the day skullked around behind the electorates back to sign the treaty's and brush it all under the carpet in a "nothing to see here" kind of way. Like I said before...who'd have thunk it that people actually value our independence, sovereignty and right to govern ourselves and to cede those rights away without consulting the people is bound to lead to ill feeling that has gone unchecked for 40 years. We dismiss democracy at our peril, and boy are we in peril now.
The original referendum was effectively about a trade deal
No it wasn't it was about remaining in or leaving the EU. It had absolutely nothing to do with a trade deal. It was about tearing up exisiting trading arrangements. The EU made it quite clear it wouldn't even discuss a trade deal until a leave deal was sorted or until the UK crashed out. That's where we are now. There is zero progress on a trade deal because that won't happen until the terms of leaving are agreed or Britain is no longer an EU member.
I meant the original referendum 40 years ago. The fact we originally voted to join the EEC, effectively a European trade agreement and nothing more, but that then turned Into the political union of the EU for which the public was never consult about joining. My argument is that if we had the arguments when going into the EU and had the elections back then, then the chances are we would have gone willingly, but the politicians thought they were being clever and decided to crack on and it is this that has caused the deep division and mistrust over the last 40 years. But then if we were consulted as we got deeper into the EU then the public would have been far better informed and the last thing governments want is an informed public....probably because most politicians are not as informed as we like to think they are.
I'm just trying to make some sense out of the current ridiculous situation. I can't believe all this has cracked off in the last 3 years...the divisions and feelings run deeper than that...hence the OP's original question...in my experience at the moment the two sides have dug in and hardened their opinions in the last 3 years.
He means the one in the 70s. And it wasn’t presented as “just a trade deal”… that’s just revisionism. Yes, it may well be that countries are more integrated than people expected back in the 70s, and more countries are included, but it was never just about trade before we joined, or when that referendum was held, or when any of the subsequent governments were voted in.
Anyway, that has little do with the slump we have our put ourselves in, or the expectation that many (including the government) have that things will only be getting worse.
We have a representational Government. We vote for an MP and the trust them (hmmm) to make decisions for us. That’s why we don’t have a death penalty because it’s not a good thing.
The fact we originally voted to join the EEC, effectively a European trade agreement and nothing more
It was already much much more. My work in environmental protection was based on European directives which were integrated into British law on Britain joing the EU. Very good laws they were too as they forced water companies to improve water treatment standards making drinking water safer to drink, sea water safer to swim in and surface water clean enough for things other than anaerobic bacteria to live in. You can drink the tap water pretty much anywhere in Europe these days.
Well I was a wee baby back in the time of the original referendum so don't know how things were presented back then...but it was a close call back then and the second referendum in an attempt at getting it through...so clearly the divisions we see today existed back then and were just as powerful, so all the more reason for politicians to take the public along with them if they truly believed ever closer union was the right course of action.
Politicians have to make the case and convince the public...they can't ride rough shot over the public...that is a dictatorship. They should have understood the divisions back then and realised the divisions were not going to go away and not kick the can down the road. Thanks to that tactic we are now seeing a move away from sensible centre liberalist politics and the rise of extremist pollitics as vast swathes of the electorate feels the politicians are not representing them and infect ignoring them. And now we have BJ and the only other alternative is Corbyn. Talk about being stuck between a rock and a hard place.
That 'it was supposed to be a just a trade bloc' is leaver revisionism
It was sold as cooperation between nations as much as an economic deal
https://twitter.com/AndyDavidson14/status/1166253134420873217
Anyways I think it's interesting that 3 years on, the sides have not changed their opinions
If 3 years after a GE a government had failed utterly to deliver their one pledge the voters would havr turned on those politicians that promised it by now , instead remainers, judges, civil servants, mps are all at fau!t. The brexiteers who never had the vaguest sketch of a plan to deliver what they promised are lionised as heroes by leavers.
that Churchill quote has been proved spectacularly correct.
Things were presented well enough back then for me to realise that I was a European citizen and borders mattered no more. My son enjoys those freedoms too, he's in Berlin at present and will be able to stay as long as he likes thanks to his French passport, it's a little sad that many of the children of people on this forum will no longer have the oportunities that I've enjoyed and have allowed me to prosper.
My question is this: As unscientific and poorly formed as the question might be, do you think the mood of the people has changed if you compare last summer with this summer?
Yes, people are getting rather lazy already with very few protests organised. I want to see more protests otherwise the news is getting really really boring.
Make the politicians sweat (all of them) and make them earn their living.
What is really depressing is that nobody on this thread seems to think that we will ultimately stay in .
wobbliscott - you have, I think, an odd view of representative democracy as practiced in the UK. You may be advocating a more Swiss style of democracy, but I’m not totally sure.
I believe we'll stay in, personally i couldn't give a flying **** about what happens south of the border but anyone who'd rather live in scotland is more than welcome to move here.
My son enjoys those freedoms too, he’s in Berlin at present and will be able to stay as long as he likes thanks to his French passport, it’s a little sad that many of the children of people on this forum will no longer have the oportunities that I’ve enjoyed and have allowed me to prosper.
Free movement has been the single biggest problem with the EU. The argument of free movement and being able to work in another country thanks to the EU is a false one. Sure it may be easier but that doesnt mean it wouldnt happen post Brexit. If you have something to offer another country you will always be able to work there, just ask the thousands of Ukranians and Russians pouring into Eastern Europe.
Ahh… the “it’ll stop them coming here, but won’t stop us going there” Leave fantasy of 2016. I thought that one had died. The rights are reciprocal, or they are lost.
Sure it may be easier but that doesnt mean it wouldnt happen post Brexit.
We have to pay £1000s in visa fees & wait for weeks or months to employ non-eu or UK staff
But the huge costs to business aside it's also about keeping culture dynamic and open as part of the union.
Anyway as for divisions, had to stay silent as my leave voting mother ranted a load of twaddle shed heard on Ian dales show on lbc last weekend, she's been quite ill so I had to bite my tongue, but knowing something about how the drugs keeping her alive are regulated and developed I found it very frustrating to hear.
How did you vote, cheekyboy?
I didnt !
I have no love for the EU whatsoever, however to vote for something that has no plan upfront seems rather daft to me.
I dont really care either way.
I see this threads dissolved up its own arse like a suppository...
These arguments ^^ have been done to death in the EU in/out thread.
The problem with this will of the people bull dung is that at the 2017 election you had the two main parties both saying they would do Brexit but get a great deal.
As a consequence you had Remainers who faced with no viable option for a Remain government voted for one or other of the two main parties based on any one or more of (1) whether they thought May or Corbyn would do a less bad job of delivering a Brexit deal. Imo both pretty dismal options so maybe you looked at other things... (2) their historic allegiance (3) other policies that mattered to them whether that's insane austerity and low taxes or promising a level of funding for public services that would involve robbing fort Knox twice a week and (4) tactical voting and any one of a number of other manifesto items. Brexit as a general election decision factor in choice of party terms wasn't irrelevant but it's been talked up with religious fervour when it should be something of a footnote in the voting habits of the remainer parts of the population.
Coming back to the OP
is it safe to assume we can blame Brexit for all our woes?
Yes and no, I see Brexit as a symptom of several things within contemporary Britain. The vote was won because the leavers were able to co-opt other "aligned causes" and target people based on their fears and problems.
None of the issues the Leavers aligned their cause to have really been addressed, they couldn't be as we have been busy tearing the nation apart further over Brexit for the last three years. Thus where people don't really see their own circumstances improving despite the brave new political landscape they are getting impatient. The tabloid/Facebook campaigns narrative tells them it's because remaining MPs, lefties and the EU are trying to stifle the "voice of the people". The truth is that while Leave was sold on the basis that it would fix things and be easy to achieve, that simply was never true...
Your question is quite a nuanced one actually, you're detecting a 'mood' in that there London but are unsure if it's because of the London bubble or a wider national malaise? IMO/IME it's nationwide and its worsening Leavers are getting angrier because what they want is within sight but may still be lost, remainers are anxious because "project fear" seems to be coming true...
The recession is coming.
I would say the recession is already here, its just that the way its measured is easily masked by the falling pound and increased pre-exit importing.
I’m pretty confident nothing much has changed in the leave/remain balance. In fact I reckon it’s more pro leave. In the city I work (Manc) there is the familiar remain hubris that existed before the referendum. In the towns and villages the leavers are more entrenched and vocal, and remainers exhausted and frustrated. Put those things together and it doesn’t look good for a new referendum.
On the positive side many more people are now experts in international trade policy and the mechanics of representative parliamentary democracy.
Put those things together and it doesn’t look good for a new referendum.
You're probably right but it's going to come down to how any referendum question is put and how the various factions campaign.
I also think if remain are going to stand a chance second time around they will need to learn to fight a bit dirtier. It's just the nature of the game now.
I would say the recession is already here, its just that the way its measured is easily masked by the falling pound and increased pre-exit importing.
I know one of the biggest medical research charities in the country has been struggling with donations from public and business side , theyd not found it this challenging since 2008
Nah, we're not in recession.....just. But that doesn't stop people thinking we're in recession and talking ourselves into it. Our economy is 80% based on services which is doing well at the moment and meaning we're slightly less exposed to the current challenges the manufacturing sector is suffering to due increasing and more intense competition from the developing world, which is what is currently challenging the European economies, especially Germany, which are nearly 80% reliant on manufacturing and production.
But in this country we love a good bit of talking ourselves down and getting ourselves into this mindset that we're on a continual downward spiral. It's a narrative that the media seems to like as bad news stories obviously sell better than positive good news stories, and ultimately that narrative seems to feed into and influence the psyche of the public at large. Many studies have shown that the perception the general public have of the current state of things, not just in the UK but globally, is significantly more pessimistic than reality.
especially Germany, which are nearly 80% reliant on manufacturing and production.
Germany economy is about 70% services. Their service sector is far bigger than ours… the fact that they have kept their manufacturing industry alive as well, by exporting to everywhere, means that they are less dependent on services… but like any modern advanced country it is absolutely core to the economy.
If you have something to offer another country you will always be able to work there
Something tells me you've never actually tried to do this...
A country allowing in workers to do specific jobs under their own terms is totally different to having the right to work somewhere.
This is why economic migrants are treated like shit around the world, from workers in Qatar building world cup infrastructure to Indian IT workers in the UK. It's bad. And it undercuts local workers even more because the companies bringing the migrants in or employing them are able to get away with far fewer protections and pay less than if they were here under EU rules.
Imagine post-Brexit a Polish agency bringing in plumbers as employees to fix British bathrooms. They'll be paid in Poland, to keep prices down, so they won't be able to move here and contribute to society, they won't pay UK tax but they won't contribute to Polish society either cos they're here living in a dorm...
The situation in Qatar and uae is completely different and not representative. They’re you have a small domestic population who are filthy rich and well educated so are not going to do manual tasks so they rely on migrant workers. In the uk the immigrants doing non skilled jobs is a case of undercutting he domestic workers who need higher wages and most send their money back home to support family so not contributing to the uk economy.
But in Qatar and anywhere if you are a professional and have skills and experience that re in demand you will get work in any country no problems whatsoever. They will bend the rules if necessary to get people in.
The immigrants are treated is nothing to do with domestic policy. There will always be employers who treat their workers well and those who don’t. Indian IT contractors in the company I work for a treated very well indeed. I suspect the polish migrants who are car washing at the local petrol station are not having such a pleasant time.
Qatar treats immigrant workers like crap no matter if they are on a building site or running a bank. Not because they’re migrant but because they’re no Qatari. But they pay well so people put up with it as most people are just there for the cash and have an exit plan.
But immigration though the headline issue in the Brexit story, is a complete red herring, it’s just a convenient story and narrative to whip up people feelings and emotions. Also post Brexit we can define our own immigration policy so nothing needs to change in terms of migration into the uk. Of course we need and rely on immigrants just like all the countries in western Europe who are facing declining populations because our birth rates are too low. What has been managed badly is the rate of immigration and handed things on a plate to the likes of Farage Andy the EDL et al.
What has been managed badly is the rate of immigration and handed things on a plate to the likes of Farage Andy the EDL et al.
not the rate of immigration thats been badly managed, its both the causes- our failure to train what we need etc- see privatisation of learn direct & collapse in apprenticeship numbers, removing student nurse bursaries, utterly neglecting FE + saddling graduates with insane debts
and then the governments failure to invest in the communities that feel left behind, whilst politicians happily scapegoat the EU & immigrants rather than be honest with the public.
immigrants are treated is nothing to do with domestic policy
I have worked with people more intelligent and with more qualifications than any of us halfwits who post in this forum … who have been treated like slaves because their limited right to work was linked to a visa and an employer. Freedom of Movement of Workers is something else entirely, and if you think otherwise… well, you’re either wilfully blind, need more real world experience, or are, well… a bit thick.
Indian IT contractors in the company I work for a treated very well indeed.
Did that include going to work for another company in the country they were working in, if they wished? How many workers in that company back at HQ were working for a reduced wage in return for a chance to gain experience abroad?
