Linford Christie above not being a particularly good example of positive dedication.
Not quite what I meant.
My nephew (ex road cyclist) wrote thishttp://tenpercentorless.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/want-to-run-958-speak-to-bolts-chemist.html
no idea if its true or otherwise but Usain Bolts laywers contacted him and told him to take it down, which he did for a while...
That article is properly mental. It reminds me of the worst Armstrong apologists but in reverse.
It's basically a load of widely known public information followed by a completely unsubstantiated claim that Bolt is linked to this. Properly mad.
But at the same time molgrips.....!
I was chatting to a rather good (ex) hurdler who's only comment on Lindord Christie was "what took them so ****ing long" he also told me quite a lot about watching fellow competitors change from one event to the next with no apparent explanation, other than drugs. I found it quite enlightening... Another guy who's a sports scientist doing research into steroid use is fascinating, I could listen all night to him. I now find it very hard to think of ANY clean professional sportspeople.
I think Bolt will be caught one day, but it'll be no different to Armstrong, first amongst equals.
Ok well Christie aside, you have to have both the physical and mental attributes to become a top athlete, drugs or no, and one is no good without the other. Therefore there must be plenty of physically ideal specimens without the desire to put it to use.
First among equals?
The whole Pelaton wasnt doping.
Not far off...
I'm 50/50, I follow boxing and this fellow,
[url= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%81ngel_Guillermo_Heredia_Hern%C3%A1ndez ]Angel Heredia / Hernandez[/url]
Has admitted coming up with several undetectable PED's
Allegedly he has "worked" with Bolt.
Basically any boxer that hires him is viewed with suspicion but none have tested positive.
He has also changed his name a few times.
molgrips - MemberOk well Christie aside, you have to have both the physical and mental attributes to become a top athlete, drugs or no, and one is no good without the other. Therefore there must be plenty of physically ideal specimens without the desire to put it to use.
I agree totally with what you're saying.
First among equals?The whole Pelaton wasnt doping.
Isn't it something like the top 21 (I can't recall / be arsed to look it up) riders in the tours that Armstrong has won have subsequently been caught? That's quite damning!
