Forum menu
Acceptable use of t...
 

[Closed] Acceptable use of the word Stoked

Posts: 91168
Free Member
 

So what would the person on the front of a tandem be if the person on the back puts in a lot of effort?


 
Posted : 11/11/2015 4:52 pm
 hels
Posts: 971
Free Member
 

So many answers molgrips, most of them obscene...


 
Posted : 11/11/2015 4:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

OED definition is:

informal, chiefly [b]North American[/b]
Excited or euphoric:
when they told me I was on the team, I was stoked

In bold is the main issue IMO, we don't call them fenders, or sidewalks etc. so we should use excited or euphoric etc. and leave the old colonies to their 'funny' colloquialisms.

Remember this is [b]Great[/b] Britain and we do things proper ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 11/11/2015 5:56 pm
Posts: 91168
Free Member
 

If you were in the US and someone used the word 'fortnight' would you have a go at them for adopting Britishisms?


 
Posted : 11/11/2015 6:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Posts: 587
Free Member
 

how about amazeballs, even worser.


 
Posted : 11/11/2015 7:13 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
Topic starter
 

plus the idea of seal failure "in the wild" seems like a fundamental insecurity I don't like much! Maybe I'll risk a set soon!

Well the original quote was from the colonies....


 
Posted : 11/11/2015 10:30 pm
Posts: 46084
Free Member
 

Stoked is overused.
So is schralp by STW staff at present.
Just say no.


 
Posted : 11/11/2015 10:48 pm
Posts: 16
Free Member
 

my dad was a stoker in't war,strange but true


 
Posted : 11/11/2015 10:56 pm
Page 2 / 2