Forum menu
A computer company ...
 

[Closed] A computer company made something new for people to buy.

Posts: 2432
Free Member
 

[url= http://tinyurl.com/3lo66rg ]Did somebody say birds? plenty of birds in this app.[/url]


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 4:06 pm
Posts: 78379
Full Member
 

I doubt minesweeper is smp ready!

Shush.

(-:


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 4:08 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

They may well be Apple patents but these features are no longer exclusive to the iphone,

Yep fair enough - just pointing out why it is not so incredible that your mate thinks these were iPhone only features. They were until fairly recently.

Apple dropped the ball by not giving the new iphone some more processing power.

Are we benchmarking phones now???? Jeesus. ๐Ÿ˜ฏ

If we are then you should probably know that comparing raw clock speeds is not a good way to do a comparison, especially when the phones have different CPUs, different architectures and different OSes.

FWIW I expect the new A5 chip will be plenty fast enough - it certainly seems to do well in the iPad 2.


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 4:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[url= http://www.edie.net/news/news_story.asp?src=nl&id=20971 ]UK's gadget obsession hitting 2020 energy saving target [/url]


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 4:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What, like iTunes? I'd quite like an iPhone, but having to use that steaming pile of poo is the main reason I haven't got one right now.

never found anyone who can tell me why or what's better. maybe you're using it wrong!
seriously though, smart playlists are amazing and without them, I couldn't use an alternative.


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 4:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So you dont think that the previous iphone having an 800Mhz processor and approx 500mb of RAM was the reason it lagged behind the 1Gh devices out there?....Youtube is full of videos showing browser comparisons between the iphone and its rivals and it is almost always slower in loading pages and browsing the internet....isnt this THE key function of a smart phone?

HTC and Samsung released 1.2Ghz twin core devices with 1Gb of RAM earlier in the year and the speed with which they work is superb....Apple respond with 1Ghz and 1Mb?....poor show....particularly with 1.5Ghz devices round the corner.

The holy grail for smart phones has surely got to be the kind of speeds that laptops are capable of?....Apple seem to want to focus on gimmicks like voice command instead.

(isnt the 'new' Apple A5 processor made by Samsung?!)


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 4:17 pm
Posts: 349
Free Member
 

never found anyone who can tell me why or what's better. maybe you're using it wrong!
seriously though, smart playlists are amazing and without them, I couldn't use an alternative.

It doesn't run properly on Linux. Pretty major issue for me that one! Also the folder organizing stuff is too rigid for me.


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 4:20 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

JulianA -
Member
Fair enough - I have admitted above that I didn't do as much research as I could have done.
Now go and pick on someone else, aracer.

You clearly did **** all research.

This place is harsh, only room for epic battle legends.


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 4:27 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

So you dont think that the previous iphone having an 800Mhz processor and approx 500mb of RAM was the reason it lagged behind the 1Gh devices out there?

I'd say the RAM would be a much bigger influence than the clock speed to be honest.

Yes, sure some of the recent droids loads web pages a second faster.

Don't forget those videos you are comparing an iPhone 4 (from June 2010) with stuff like a Samsung S2 (May 2011). A year is a long time in this market.

Also don't forget that the Samsung's low resolution display means it has 230,000 fewer pixels to render in the same time.

HTC and Samsung released 1.2Ghz twin core devices with 1Gb of RAM earlier in the year and the speed with which they work is superb....Apple respond with 1Ghz and 1Mb?

Err no... Apple respond with a 1GHz System-on-a-chip (i.e. not just a CPU) that is dual-core, has dual-core PowerVR graphics and 1GB of RAM.

That seems a relatively tit-for-tat response.

BTW do you know who makes that nice Apple A5 SoC? Samsung!

Edit: oh you did ๐Ÿ˜€

Apple seem to want to focus on gimmicks like voice command instead.

Apple gimmicks are what launched the smartphone market and got it to where it is now. Perhaps you should give them more credit?


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 4:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Also the folder organizing stuff is too rigid for me.

why would you want to do it differently?... It's not a place you need to go to surely?


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

the folder organizing stuff is too rigid for me.

??

I have all my MP3s organised as I want them (in folders named with Artist then Album Name). I did that myself, not iTunes, as my collection pre-dates me using iTunes. So I just pointed iTunes at this collection and it works. Not sure what the issue is.


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 5:18 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Which part of

That is all.

did you people not get?

๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 5:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well this discussion is certainly going well ๐Ÿ˜‰

a lower power CPU for better battery life... Faster CPU? Meh

Though often a faster CPU does also mean better battery life (assuming you can throttle it - don't know about the processors in these phones, but assume they must have loads of power saving features). For example the "netbook" I'm typing on has a higher power dual core processor than the stock machine, which apparently results in better battery life because more can be switched off for normal usage.


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 5:22 pm
Posts: 23
Full Member
 

HTC and Samsung released 1.2Ghz twin core devices with 1Gb of RAM earlier in the year and the speed with which they work is superb....Apple respond with 1Ghz and 1Mb?....poor show....particularly with 1.5Ghz devices round the corner.

You compare completely irrelevant statistics. Would a 4ghz Pentium 4 roast a 2.5ghz i7? The vast majority of the time I'd rather have a modern chip run at a lower clockspeed, lowering heat and raising battery life.

Do you mean solely for 3d processing in games? Those Snapdragons have absolutely terrible 3d processing power, or anything floating point for that matter. The Galaxy S2 has a load of power... because it uses the same ARM A9-Cortex architechture as the iPhones. Pure CPU wise I'd take the iPhones over the crappy Qualcomm in the HTC Sensation anyday.


 
Posted : 06/10/2011 9:04 am
Posts: 23
Full Member
 

Though often a faster CPU does also mean better battery life

Lower nm process used in the CPU means longer battery life. This in turn means lower heat, which often means higher clockspeeds.

To be honest, 90% will go on your screen anyway.


 
Posted : 06/10/2011 9:12 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Though often a faster CPU does also mean better battery life

CPU [b]efficiency[/b] is the key, not speed.


 
Posted : 06/10/2011 9:33 am
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

So you dont think that the previous iphone having an 800Mhz processor and approx 500mb of RAM was the reason it lagged behind the 1Gh devices out there?....[b]Youtube is full of videos showing browser comparisons [/b]between the iphone and its rivals and it is almost always slower in loading pages and browsing the internet....

Yes but only real saddoes are tragic enough to spend their time watching them.


 
Posted : 06/10/2011 9:38 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 06/10/2011 9:52 am
Page 2 / 2