Forum search & shortcuts

9.3 female sexual p...
 

[Closed] 9.3 female sexual partners

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#4428528]

[url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19812608 ]BBC News[/url]

In the context of a stupid story about James Bond's promiscuity:

The Health Survey for England, published in 2011, found that men reported a mean average of [b]9.3 female sexual partners[/b] in their lifetime.

Jeebus, I'm missing out!

What's your score? No bragging now, just numbers..


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I dunno - I'm not dead yet.


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

You think you'll know when your dead?


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well - I won't know until I am


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:07 pm
 MSP
Posts: 15842
Free Member
 

I lost count after the second one so it could actually be anywhere between 2 and a very big number.


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Does married count as dead in this context? Assume so


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Above average, does this make me a stud or something?


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:11 pm
 Nick
Posts: 3693
Full Member
 

I'm 72% above average!


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The 0.3 sounds very illegal


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:13 pm
 MSP
Posts: 15842
Free Member
 

The 0.3 sounds very illegal

Mermaids are fair game when you have been at sea for a while.


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:14 pm
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

Does the .3 mean that one has a part share in a conquest, or that one has only reached base one and a bit?


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[b]Nick[/b] - Member
I'm 72% above average!

You cannot know that as we don't know the distribution (excuse Geek content)


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:16 pm
Posts: 91174
Free Member
 

I remember the 0.3 - not a very successful night.


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"You cannot know that as we don't know the distribution (excuse Geek content)"

That's just cost you your .3, Jambalaya


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well that sex god of British politics Nick Clegg claims to have had no more than 30 sexual conquests.

[url= http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1583465/Nick-Clegg-has-had-sex-with-no-more-than-30.html ]Nick Clegg has had sex with 'no more' than 30[/url]

Which falls well short of James Bond's alleged 46.


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

One can only assume that hora's spidey senses are all of a tingle...


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

So young man stopped in the street and asked "how many sexual partners have you had?” obvious answer loads at least....

Farcical, market research ❓

you decide


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

My thought exactly Kona.

Confession time: I'm 43 next week and my score is a big fat 1. Must try harder.


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:28 pm
Posts: 3743
Free Member
 

i got to 9 before i was out of the C's, I dont think there's an even distribution through the alphabet though*

* i used to be much more attractive


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:30 pm
 ton
Posts: 24303
Full Member
 

from the age of 16 to 22 i was quite promiscuous. 7 or so. 😳


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:32 pm
Posts: 2112
Full Member
 

In four years at uni (incl repeated year), I worked my way through a fair few. Quality control wasn't switched on though and beer was the common denominator (which explains the .3 I guess)


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

9.3 at once?


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It sounds like dubious research to me. Whats the adage add 3 to any number a woman gives and take 3 from anything a man says. So Buzz is on -2...

Probably paid for by a political party seeking to tax that particular activity to help pay off the national debt in this time of austerity, like a stamp duty type thing. After all its about the only bloody thing that isn't taxed!!


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Apparently women have had more sexual partners in the UK than men now. So this means their shagging foreigners, I wonder if the Daily Mail have used that one yet? Or depending if that number was mode as opposed to mean....sharing the same men. :mrgreen:


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:39 pm
Posts: 27603
Free Member
 

druidh - Member
Well - I won't know until I am (dead)

Meet the right (wrong?) woman and your score may keep going up after.... 😯


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:42 pm
 MSP
Posts: 15842
Free Member
 

Apparently women have had more sexual partners in the UK than men now. So this means their shagging foreigners, I wonder if the Daily Mail have used that one yet? Or depending if that number was mode as opposed to mean....sharing the same men.

It could just mean that lesbians are the most successful/promiscuous group, thinking about it, that would explain my own meagre contribution to the statistics.


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:45 pm
Posts: 6160
Full Member
 

Nick Clegg claims to have had no more than 30 sexual conquests.

But 0 is no more than 30, so he's given himself quite a lot of leeway there...
i got to 9 before i was out of the C's, I dont think there's an even distribution through the alphabet though*

I've found J, K, L and M are the most frequent letters that crop up; I'm thinking a bell curve across the alphabet.


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

ton - Member
from the age of 16 to 22 i was quite promiscuous. 7 or so.

Bloody hell Ton thats not promiscuous!
I had 4 in one week once!

DISCLAIMER
Don't try this at home. It got quite messy, not in a bukakke fashion though.


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Apparently women have had more sexual partners in the UK than men now

1. it's foreign blokes on holiday
2. it's one very naughty bloke doing all our women
3. it's a lot of "sandwiches"


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:49 pm
 MSP
Posts: 15842
Free Member
 

Isn't bukkake that Indian dance in sari's and finger cymbals?


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Behave peeps or this will get closed.


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

since 1988, 1

before that, a gentleman doesn't tell


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:53 pm
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

To date: 1


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:57 pm
Posts: 13602
Full Member
 

I was a student in Portsmouth with no accommodation for 11 weeks.

A successful pull meant a bed for the night (more if she thought I was good).

Not sure of the total number but the quality of the lady was often weather dependent. I used to be followed by fat ugly girls on rainy nights.


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 6:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I am advised that it's quality rather than quantity that matters.
Unfortunately this is another area in need of improvement apparently.


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 7:00 pm
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

Yeah, I'm above the national average - but certainly no Lothario.

I think there have been a fair few occasions where I've been the recipient of a sympathy shag to be honest. Remember for the men - woman where beer goggles as well.


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 7:06 pm
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

Glitch bump?


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 7:07 pm
Posts: 6160
Full Member
 

been the recipient of a sympathy shag

I've never heard of such a phenomenon, can someone explain how one goes about receiving such things??


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 7:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I lost count. Not because it's a high number (double figures just I think), but I prefer to forget. The older you get, and the longer you've been with you're current partner, the less interesting the figure becomes. Given time, I could work it out, but why would I want to?

EDIT: Thought. Rather age dependant isn't it. I'm 47.


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 7:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

One - we met 30 years ago yesterday


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 7:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If you have only had one bird how do you know if she is any good ?


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 7:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Seriously?

People can actually remember how many?

To an exact figure?

It's quite an odd thing IMO, to be able to tell someone, without needing time to think about it, how many different people you've stuck your winky in. Almost like you actually think about it, or even remember them all individually.

I chose not to count*. It's not a competition, nor does counting serve any purpose (other than being able to respond to surveys) 🙂

*If I did count, it would be 9.3 though


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 7:18 pm
Posts: 7294
Full Member
 

.3 for me .
hey ho


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 7:19 pm
Posts: 5938
Free Member
 

I'd say between 20 and 25, but my 20's were very hazy...


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 7:22 pm
 Nick
Posts: 3693
Full Member
 

It's not a competition,

Technically it is though isn't it.


 
Posted : 04/10/2012 7:25 pm
Page 1 / 4