Forum menu
What's wrong w...
 

[Closed] What's wrong with this picture

Posts: 106
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#2723099]

[IMG] [/IMG]

So far I've got:-

...cliched MTB-ers road bike
...comedy frame geometry
...long cage rear mech
...bar tape won't stay that clean for long
...bottle cage bodged on the seat tube with zipties
...tyre logos upside down
...chain in granny ring
...path needs weeding

Hmmm. Can't help feeling I've missed something 😀


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 9:56 am
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

gemetry of frame is fine.

saddle too far forward.
too many spacers above and below stem
hoods are at a funny angle.
drain cover half buried by fence and rubble.


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 9:59 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

MTB rear mudguard


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 9:59 am
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

Umm.... badly aligned mountain bike style mudguard on the back? Steerer tube not cut down? Stem pointing upwards?


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 10:02 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

distinct lack of boobs


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 10:03 am
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Comedy pedals.


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 10:03 am
Posts: 6332
Free Member
 

- brake cable inner needs trimming
- leaning against bars not rear wheel


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 10:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The godawful mudguard,and what Phil said.


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 10:05 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Fence needs attention too


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 10:08 am
Posts: 106
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I'd forgotten the comedy spacer stack, good spot.

Saddle always ends up rammed forward on all my bikes, just seems the right position for me.

Will be available for tarring and feathering on the FW on Sunday. I'd half considered putting a QR seatclamp on specially but I think the mudguard will be enough 🙂


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 10:10 am
Posts: 8904
Free Member
 

White bar tape with black saddle? No no no!


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 10:10 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

White [i]white?[/i] [b]WHITE?[/b] [U]White?[/u] Hoods?? What were you thinking?

(To be honest, I don't care and that was the only thing I could see that was odd, apart from the Great Gonzo saddle and that's already been mentioned)


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 10:12 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Saddle always forward cos your a short arse who buys frames that are too long. 😆


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 10:13 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Isn't that mudguard just going to dump absolutely everything on to your rear brake?

Saddle should match bar tape and tyres. Also is that a mtb saddle? And those hoods should really be black.


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 10:15 am
Posts: 106
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Oi! lets have a bit more solidarity from the Mendip locals there!

I've actually got a white saddle for it but it's not as comfy as that one, it'll go back on after the weekend when some of the committee's other concerns may also be addressed.

Non white hoods would have cost more BTW 😉


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 10:16 am
 ski
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

toe overlap?


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 10:17 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

surely if you need the saddle that high you need an larger frame?


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 10:18 am
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

[i]it's not as comfy as that one[/i]

it's a road bike, I'm not sure 'comfy' should really be a consideration?


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 10:18 am
Posts: 106
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Marginal decision on the sizing, would have needed a very short stem on a "medium". This one is nicely chuckable & climbs like a bullet out of the saddle.


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 10:20 am
Posts: 8904
Free Member
 

Saddle height looks ok but it looks much too far forward.


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 10:22 am
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

lol at using the term 'chuckable' to describe a road bike 😆


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 10:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Wheels almost rub on the frame? Wheels too big for frame?


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 10:26 am
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

you need to trim the inner cables where they come out of the brakes as well - there's far too much 'spare' before you get to the end cap.


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 10:28 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm wondering if that saddle is in roughly the right position actually, if you look at it relative to the BB rather then the seat tube, it looks ok. Do those planet x frames just have really slack seat tubes?

Also surely the computer should be on the stem not the bars.


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 10:28 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Agree with chunky, it looks like you've put adult parts (no pun intended) on a kids frame.


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 10:29 am
Posts: 106
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Seat angle is pretty normal I think, as I said I just always end up with an inline post & seat forwards. Maybe someday I'll go for a bike fit so they can measure my legs etc & find out why.

Cables etc will be trimmed in due course (still bedding in).

Computer was £13.99 from Lidl!


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 10:36 am
Posts: 5349
Full Member
 

Agree with chunky, it looks like a kid has put parts (no pun intended) on a frame.

FTFY


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 10:37 am
Posts: 4041
Full Member
 

I don't think my sofa is as comfortable as that saddle.


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 10:46 am
Posts: 4041
Full Member
 

How many of those parts came from a MTB? To me it looks like:

- Mud guard
- Saddle
- Seat post
- Stem
- Rear mech?
- Cassette?

And how are the tyres? Any good? (Genuinely interested)


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 10:49 am
Posts: 106
Free Member
Topic starter
 

The Ultremos? Pretty quick and not that much harsher than the 25mm GP 4 seasons I've been training on, only ~100 miles on them as yet so dunno about durability.

Might put the Contis back on for Sunday if the forecast stays wet though.

Rear mech is SRAM Apex so effectively MTB. Cassette is 11-28.

Mudguard really was nicked off my mountain bike!


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 10:58 am
Posts: 24440
Full Member
 

needs more beard


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 11:03 am
Posts: 20
Full Member
 

Frame just not Violently Green enough for my tastes.

What is the word "racing" doing on your bike? You NEVER race anyone anywhere ;o#.

Cranks are (probably) 170mm and for your (ahem) stature 165mm would be generous.

Bike is still in Somerset and needs to be closer to Lakes ASAP.

The very best of luck with the Fred Whitton.


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 12:23 pm
Posts: 12088
Full Member
 

Mudguard looks stupid, but if it keeps your back dry who cares? The computer sensor also looks too high up, covering up the fork logo.

How does it ride?


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 12:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oi! lets have a bit more solidarity from the Mendip locals there!

should that read a bit more solidarity from the Mencap locals - judging the picture? 😉


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 1:49 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Poorly maintained feather edged fencing 🙂 PLUS chalk vandalism! 🙁


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 1:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Lack of braking reliability and power at the rear. Advise an insane and ill-advised rear disc convesion.


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 1:58 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

Could we just have a

"What's right with this picture?"

thread next time?


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 2:02 pm
Posts: 8904
Free Member
 

Does it have a seatpost clamp or does the mudguard stop the post slipping down?


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 2:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's unlikely that any self-respecting Weasel would want to visit that garden.. so there's absolutely no need whatsoever for an expensive bicycle-shaped Weasel scarer..?


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 2:13 pm
Posts: 106
Free Member
Topic starter
 

The fence is next door's responsibility not mine, you won't get me on that!

How does it ride?

Ah yes, that minor detail... rather well actually, the wheels could be lighter but nice quick handling without getting too squirrelly at speed and it climbs very, very effectively. Certainly stiffer than the steel frame I've been training on all winter but not noticeably harsher (allowing for the tyres).

Thinking I might twist the mudguard round to a jaunty 15 degree angle for Hardknott on Sunday for the full horrific effect. Just got to avoid the impulse to bunnyhop potholes and cattle grids all day...


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 2:30 pm
Posts: 91168
Free Member
 

Looks small for how tall you must be with that seat. Are you a freak perhaps?

Hoods look fine though if it's an ergo bar. I like having flat tops onto flat hoods, but on the bars I have I can never reach the drops properly set up like that. Doesnt' really look like an ergo bar though, looks a bit like you have levers with reach adjust that are adjusted a lot.


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 2:38 pm
Posts: 106
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I'm 5'6" and fairly standard proportions... I think.

The bar is a Ritchey ergo shape but with a shallower drop than usual, the lever reach is indeed adjustable (they're SRAM Rival) and wound in a bit.

It's a normal sort of length, 530mm effective TT, just a really short seat tube. In fact it's exactly the same TT as this:-

[IMG] [/IMG]

- which I did most of my winter training on.


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 2:59 pm
Posts: 8904
Free Member
 

Your training bike is more acceptable than your best bike even though it has a triple on it.


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 3:03 pm
Posts: 4041
Full Member
 

Mister P +1, that's a fine looking winter bike (despite the triple).


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 3:05 pm
Posts: 106
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I knew that was coming 🙂


 
Posted : 06/05/2011 3:09 pm
Page 1 / 2