Forum menu
Some bikes just loo...
 

[Closed] Some bikes just look 'right'

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Carbon ring too or is it just the colour?

IIRC it's a decal on a normal chainring. Might be wrong though.

Di2 does seem a waste on it though.. More weight..

True, but an end shifter wouldn't look quite as neat. Add a hub gear and it would look incredible!!


 
Posted : 15/05/2013 10:46 pm
Posts: 66111
Full Member
 

shandcycles - Member

No I wouldn't, because it's customers bike set up and built to fit him.

Well, there's no way to say this without sounding like a **** but it doesn't look like it was built to fit him- it looks like it's too short and he's had to push the seat back to try and sort it. Now I'm not saying that's what's actually happened, bike fit is a personal choice but that's the first impression it gives me.

So tell him that, and I'll have it off him for a pound ๐Ÿ˜‰ least I can do. TBF i think it's lovely other than a couple of minor details.


 
Posted : 15/05/2013 10:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Have too agree with Northwind here.. First impression screams bad sizing.

Also Jim: Hub gear? Di2 is lighter than an Alfine or something.. Plus not sure you can do it with a disc..


 
Posted : 15/05/2013 10:52 pm
 IanW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This thread says why we all love our kids and why we aren't all talented artist in one easy read.


 
Posted : 15/05/2013 10:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

gmex, I never said it would be lighter. And you're right, it probably isn't possible, but it would look cool as all hell.


 
Posted : 15/05/2013 11:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well, there's no way to say this without sounding like a **** but it doesn't look like it was built to fit him- it looks like it's too short and he's had to push the seat back to try and sort it.

Saddle set back has little to do with whether a bike is too "long" or "short". Its also set right in the middle of the seatpost, so I'd say the seat tube angle and set back is bang on!

The frame looks ok apart from the placement of the cable stop for the rear mech outer.

The short upright stem looks shite though, as does the chainset, mtb cassette, mtb rear mech, saddle and non-disc rims.


 
Posted : 15/05/2013 11:31 pm
 Andy
Posts: 3348
Free Member
 

The Shand Stoater I saw at the Bespoked Bristol Show was the nicest bike there IMO. Lovely built frame. I really want one ๐Ÿ˜ฅ


 
Posted : 15/05/2013 11:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You see, this is why I'm not showing you lot any of my frames ๐Ÿ˜‰

Sizing looks good to me - the saddle isn't particularly far back.


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 12:12 am
Posts: 11646
Full Member
 

I like this eriksen, not entirely convinced on the lefty fork though but if came home to find the postie had left such a bike in my shed wi a lefty fork i doubt i'd kick off.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 12:23 am
Posts: 66111
Full Member
 

Nuclear option!

[url= http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6239/6348502125_cca88922aa_z.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6239/6348502125_cca88922aa_z.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/53860438@N06/6348502125/ ]IMG_0346[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/53860438@N06/ ]Northwindlowlander[/url], on Flickr


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 12:27 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sizing is the least of the issues about the bike in the OP - to be honest I think it looks fine. The fact it's a customer's bike built as he wanted probably means it looks beautiful to him, but you can't dismiss the objections lots of other people have to it because of that.

Road rims are properly heavy! 465g for an Open Pro, compare to about 340g for a Stans Alpine.

Yeah, because that's really comparing like with like ๐Ÿ™„ How much does a Notubes Alpha rim weigh (or even an AC CR350), how much an X317?


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 1:44 am
Posts: 942
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 2:17 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

Ahhh aracer beat me to it. Mind you I have some 16" rim-brake rims that are lighter than my 29er disc ones, so maybe he's right.

gmex619 PLEASE tell me you are having a laugh. Aero rims on any mtb, let alone a burly-ish HT?


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 7:07 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Then all is well with the world Still can't see 'em on the fork but then I actually do need to go to Specsavers

they're on the inside of the fork leg about 1/4 of the way up, so they don't interfere with the calliper. There's also an eyelet on the underside of the crown.

Anyhoo... Do you do forks on their own?

Not at the moment.

Well, there's no way to say this without sounding like a **** but it doesn't look like it was built to fit him- it looks like it's too short and he's had to push the seat back to try and sort it. Now I'm not saying that's what's actually happened, bike fit is a personal choice but that's the first impression it gives me.

Wow, I'm impressed, I've been doing this every day for 10 years and thought I was pretty good but it turns out you can tell if a bike fit is wrong without even seeing the rider! When can you start?

It's one of our production frames and it's set up for the customer. The saddle is where it needs to be to get the correct setback. Which is actually smack bang in the middle of saddle rails. If you say it's wrong though, I'm sure you're right. ๐Ÿ˜•

First impression screams bad sizing.

What a load of old gash.

Saddle set back has little to do with whether a bike is too "long" or "short". Its also set right in the middle of the seatpost, so I'd say the seat tube angle and set back is bang on!

Ah, someone with some sense....

oh, hang on...

The frame looks ok apart from the placement of the cable stop for the rear mech outer.

Ah, ok, the Shimano OEM spec book must be wrong. Where should the stop be and I'll let them know?

mtb cassette

It's not.

mtb rear mech

It's not. but if you'd prefer me to fit a short cage I will. It won't work with the triple chainset but when the customer complains I'll tell him not to worry 'cause some keyboard jock on STW said it's ok.


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 7:18 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Chainset...
[img] [/img]

Other than that I think it looks ace


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 7:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As mountain bikes go I think this looks more 'right' than most:

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 8:02 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

Blimey, that Kona is almost there. Chainset looks awful though.


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 8:27 am
Posts: 20663
Full Member
 

Blimey, that Kona is almost there. Chainset looks awful though.

+1.
The BMC full sus ^^ is also almost there; in fact for a full sus it's very good looking indeed given that most full sus bikes look like the bastard offspring of a crash in a Meccano factory and an explosion in a paint factory.

This is nice:

[img] [/img]

It looks purposeful, reasonably minimalist without the huge screaming graphics a lot of bikes seem to be afflicted with yet aethestically pleasing. I'd say it needed black bar tape though. And it should have been photographed in the big chainring.


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 8:57 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

^^ that's quite nice, thing I don't like about it are/is the yellow'ish rims on the tyres, I hate that kinda thang, they should be either white(gash) or black, simple. The bar tape is ok but then the saddle should match the colour, white. It's got the wrong cranks on it, should be mechanical Red.

Nice though.

I'm all for Niner Air9C but I'm not posting a pic of one... That's a gorgeous looking bike.

I have yet to see a nice looking FS, the nearest I can find is SC's Tallboy LT.

I'll find a pic of a drop bar fatty, one that was on a Rapha Blog a while back, now that looked fabulous..


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 9:22 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

No. The English is wrong. The rear triangle looks like it's off a full suss bike.
Post of a picture of your track bike. That'll settle this argument. ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 9:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm surprised Shand didn't show the Pink Stooshie they posted on Facebook the other day...

[img] [/img]

*swoon*


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 9:26 am
Posts: 66111
Full Member
 

shandcycles - Member

If you say it's wrong though, I'm sure you're right.

Not being funny but you even quoted the part of my post where I said exactly the opposite. But if you want to be offended, that's your right I'm sure.


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 9:33 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not being funny but you even quoted the part of my post where I said exactly the opposite. But if you want to be offended, that's your right I'm sure.

fair enough, just wanted to put my point across... I 'aint gonna be offended, it's just bikes, innit? ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 9:42 am
Posts: 1059
 

Old Konas generally always look good:

[img] http://www.retrobike.co.uk/forum/download/file.php?id=10862&sid=1cb4cfd6ae26c75a993701bc0977e0de [/img]


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 9:45 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Old Konas generally always look good:

Unless they are mine ๐Ÿ˜ˆ

[img] [/img]

Scary twitchy ditch-magnet b*&*ard of a thing to ride... "I will kill you!"


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 9:55 am
Posts: 1522
Full Member
 

just received one of these...
[img] [/img]
Simple build, easy to ride and nice colour scheme. It looks like a proper bike.


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 10:05 am
Posts: 9238
Free Member
 

It's got the wrong cranks on it, should be mechanical Red.

SRAM red cranks with Shimano gearing and brakes? FSA is fine but the black/white SL:K would have been better although you'd have got grey-silver chainrings


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 10:11 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Both of these: drop bar fatties..

[img][url= http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8239/8470954667_d04a21f598.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8239/8470954667_d04a21f598.jp g"/> [/img][/url] [url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/65239715@N05/8470954667/ ]image[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/65239715@N05/ ]bikebouy[/url], on Flickr[/img]

[img][url= http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7285/8743025073_7684437f1a.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7285/8743025073_7684437f1a.jp g"/> [/img][/url] [url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/65239715@N05/8743025073/ ]image[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/65239715@N05/ ]bikebouy[/url], on Flickr[/img]

And no, that English should be kitted out all in Red.


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 10:14 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm all for Niner Air9C but I'm not posting a pic of one... That's a gorgeous looking bike.

I can post a pic of one if you want chap? ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 10:28 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

No flange, please noooooo ๐Ÿ˜†

Have you raced it yet?


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 10:30 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I haven't mate. I've been ill for a fair while so lack of fitness is keeping me away from the races at the moment. In fact, it's still hung in the shop next to this...

[URL= http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y250/wilk2032/rdo_zpsb20a1d70.jp g" target="_blank">http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y250/wilk2032/rdo_zpsb20a1d70.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]

RDO too, those are A-head wheels which are jolly nice. And jolly expensive. No Ki2 though so mine wins....


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 10:35 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 10:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

With the exception of the Konas, obviously, you're all wrong... this is awesumz to the power of rad:

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 10:53 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

[i]I'm surprised Shand didn't show the Pink Stooshie they posted on Facebook the other day...[/i]

Now that's nice.


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 10:56 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Though there's a bit of an optical illusion going on with the wheels, I like to think my steed is almost as pretty as the scenery.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 11:33 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

thing I don't like about it are/is the yellow'ish rims on the tyres

Can't really criticise a bike for having Veloflex tubs.

I'm opening myself up for it here, but given clean lines and minimalism seem to be a positive thing, how about mine:
[IMG] [/IMG]
Slammed stem, stem angle matches top tube, minimalist (well apart from the wheels - I do keep thinking about delogoing them, what does anybody think?) matching chainset, Campag. I've even got the tyre logos in the right place - apologies for not getting having the valves at the top in the photos. That ugly Polar sensor has now gone.


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 11:56 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

drop bar fatties

Instant fail. I'm assuming you had to find another ugly tree to drop those out of when the first one wasn't quite enough.


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 11:58 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

(well apart from the wheels - I do keep thinking about delogoing them, what does anybody think?)

Ditch the logo's! Less is more... ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 12:14 pm
Posts: 9296
Free Member
 

Bigmountainscotland, love that bike!


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 12:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

http://www.pinkbike.com/photo/8673846/

Devinci Wilson looks "right" to me. Looks elegant & fast all at the same time.


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 12:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[IMG] [/IMG]

Pretty,with covering of KOM dust... ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 12:36 pm
 will
Posts: 44
Free Member
 

Stunning:

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 12:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

GIANT = svelte...


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 12:44 pm
Posts: 2
Full Member
 

We need a picture of one of those Dog's Dinner early Whytes(?) on this thread to go with everything else. The ones with bits going everywhere.

Anyone care to oblige?


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 2:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The PRST? I really, really want one of them...


 
Posted : 16/05/2013 2:43 pm
Page 2 / 3