Forum search & shortcuts

Rockshox Upside Dow...
 

[Closed] Rockshox Upside Down Carbon Rigid Teaser Pic?

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Liar

yeah your actually correct ,I just read the entire thread


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 11:38 am
Posts: 3687
Full Member
 

The fork on that bike in the fb pic doesn't appear to have a brace - yes I am that sad to try and look that closely at it - and the crown/steerer interface doesn't look at the right angle for the Lauf either.

My guess would be either a rigid 29er fork or a USD.

My other guess is that I need to get out more..... 😳


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 11:45 am
 LoCo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Doesn't look strong enough for any suspension units to be attached, get the feeling it's not going to be very exciting when we do see what it is anyway 😉

Another Rockshox marketing dept. promo fail maybe in the offing 😆


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 11:50 am
Posts: 10341
Free Member
 

Probably LoCo
The only thing that keeps me wondering is that little capped area on the right-hand leg (not that it looks particularly removable to access suspension gubbins).


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 12:13 pm
Posts: 4699
Full Member
 

The brake hose guide is quite open - a bit like the reverb hose seat tube guides. Perhaps the hose has to move...


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 1:11 pm
Posts: 8177
Free Member
 

We need Jamie to do some comedy versions of what might be coming...

Jamie, Jamie, Jamie.....

🙂


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 1:13 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

my mate who knows someone who once crapped in the same toilet as Sam Hill said it was a new special dropper post fork butter knife thing.

You heard it here first.


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 1:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I don't get the ad 'Of mountain biking upside down' - what does of mountain biking mean and no coma after biking. Doesn't make sense to me. 'Off mountain biking'???

[i]edit: I get it now, I only looked at the top part of the ad! Road disc fork then, hardly groundbreaking though.


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 1:27 pm
Posts: 34551
Full Member
 

a RAC- like upside down fork, sadly i doubt it

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 1:29 pm
 edd
Posts: 1391
Full Member
 

It looks way too big to be a road fork. Here's an image of another road fork for comparison (look at the steerer for scale):
[img] [/img]
[img] ?20120719100120[/img]


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 1:54 pm
Posts: 3642
Full Member
 

Fatbike fork!


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 1:58 pm
 DanW
Posts: 1062
Free Member
 

Another Rockshox marketing dept. promo fail maybe in the offing

This 😀 The wording suggests they are going to imminently revolutionize the world of something two wheeled that may or may not be MTB. Big claims given the variety of forks and sus approaches already out there...


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 2:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is it really a fail? Rockshox marketing often seems to take the piss out of hyperbolic marketing precisely when it does the same. Remember all the "this shock is so good an ordinary rider can't have it" and the constant ramming home of how "murdered out" the new Pike was? They've got something new, it's a bit different to the old thing, but not by much, and they need to advertise it.


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 2:13 pm
 LoCo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Forget to add enough smileys etc for the irony of my post maybe, I like new stuff, however I am becoming cynical in my old age and all the 'new' developments 😉
The marketing works as it takes the mic. And gets people to react whether they understand it or not, outrage or smirk 😉


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 2:18 pm
Posts: 8844
Full Member
 

Edited as didn't read the post above properly.


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 2:29 pm
 1978
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It looks way too big to be a road fork.

+1, especially if the steerer in the picture is tapered...


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 2:34 pm
Posts: 4699
Full Member
 

Upside down fork: [img] [/img]


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 3:06 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

OK, so they turned MTB upside down with the RS-1, but I still reckon that's going to be a USD road/cross fork.

Which would be a very interesting piece of kit if it is!

If it does turn out to be a carbon fatty fork, I'll be disappointed. And bored. 🙂


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 3:07 pm
Posts: 1228
Free Member
 

ohhh tense... speculation... ohhhh


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 3:08 pm
 1978
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Where are these pics coming from?


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 3:12 pm
Posts: 4699
Full Member
 

Their facebook page.


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 3:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

shouldn't it read
"The Re-release of RS-1"
I thought their first ever fork was the RS-1
seems like they have sacked the fork naming guy and are just re-hashing old names for new forks now.
Still looks interesting.


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 3:17 pm
Posts: 8177
Free Member
 

Cyclocross suss fork?


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 3:28 pm
Posts: 10341
Free Member
 

Very interesting - the use of carbon for the uppers and crown is pretty innovative.
So I was right about that little cap 🙂


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 3:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's a FatBike USD fork then?


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 3:33 pm
Posts: 8844
Full Member
 

Cyclocross suss fork?

Are you allowed to run suss forks in CX?


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 3:33 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Are you allowed to run suss forks in CX?

Who cares? Ditto re road. Who cares? The majority of consumers/users of bikes don't race under UCI regs, so can use what they want. A USD road/cross fork would be lovely on a tracks and trails CX bike.

If it's a fat bike fork though, well, just meh.


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 3:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Suspension on a cross bike defeats the point of a cross bike.


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 3:35 pm
Posts: 10341
Free Member
 

Rough composite of what we have so far.
As mentioned, proportions look more mountain bike/fat bike than cross/road

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 3:40 pm
Posts: 34551
Full Member
 

so they have reinvented the marzocchi rac!


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 3:44 pm
 1978
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is it possible that the two photos are of different forks? The leg profiles seem very different..........


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 3:44 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

As mentioned, proportions look more mountain bike/fat bike than cross/road

Once put together like that, I have to agree.


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 3:51 pm
Posts: 10341
Free Member
 

I couldn't put it together any other way while keeping each released photo at the same scale. Obviously the length is unknown.

Hopefully there are some guards over the lowers.


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 3:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is it possible that the two photos are of different forks? The leg profiles seem very different..........

They do don't they? The shot of the lowers is definitely from a different angle but the top half looks to be a kind of flattened aero shape and the lowers look round. Very odd.


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 3:55 pm
 LoCo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

However referencing by eye the stantion diameter to lower steerer tube diameter the stantion (actual) slider, from the picture above would be about 38mm, which bring into question weight etc.
This is starting to annoy me know
👿


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 3:56 pm
Posts: 4699
Full Member
 

I think it's a SID replacement. Ultra light weight carbon crown with the strength and weight advantages of a USD fork.

Probably works best with a spike-equipped 800mm-long reverb. 😈


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 4:01 pm
Posts: 10341
Free Member
 

LoCo - Member

However referencing by eye the stantion diameter to lower steerer tube diameter the stantion (actual) slider, from the picture above would be about 38mm, which bring into question weight etc.
This is starting to annoy me know


Doing it in photoshop, I get 32mm stanchions.
top of steerer is 85px, stanchion is 95px


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 4:03 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

shouldn't it read
"The Re-release of RS-1"
I thought their first ever fork was the RS-1

read it in order...


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 4:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Who cares? Ditto re road. Who cares? The majority of consumers/users of bikes don't race under UCI regs, so can use what they want. A USD road/cross fork would be lovely on a tracks and trails CX bike.

Even if it is a 29er xc fork, if it's a light weight SID then why not stick it on a disc CX bike. It'd be more down to makers of CX bikes to produce a frame that worked well with a sus fork a2c.


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 4:11 pm
Posts: 10341
Free Member
 

.


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 4:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A suspension fork equipped cx bike? So kinda like a mountain bike then.

You could also put wider, straighter bars on it, oh and fatter tyres too.


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 4:36 pm
Posts: 10341
Free Member
 

Well the 'Everything Changes' image just shows it on a 'normal' hardtail mountain bike.


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 4:46 pm
Posts: 8844
Full Member
 

I'm interested to see what they've done at the axle end.


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 4:54 pm
Posts: 1352
Free Member
 

Crown area on it looks very wide to be a CX or a road fork.


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 5:21 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

I think it's a SID replacement. Ultra light weight carbon crown with the strength and weight advantages of a USD fork.

That would be awesome. The RAC was meant to exist in a silly lightweight XC variant too, but they never managed it.


 
Posted : 20/03/2014 5:35 pm
Page 2 / 7